EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 67 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 67
Number of page(s) 15
Section Ultrasonics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025052
Published online 31 October 2025
  1. G. D’Angelo, S. Rampone: Feature extraction and soft computing methods for aerospace structure defect classification. Measurement 85 (2016) 192–209. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Silva, E. Malitckii, T. Santos, P. Vilaça: Review of conventional and advanced non-destructive testing techniques for detection and characterization of small-scale defects. Progress in Materials Science 138 (2023) 101155. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Zarei, S. Pilla: Laser ultrasonics for nondestructive testing of composite materials and structures: a review. Ultrasonics 136 (2024) 107163. [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Wang, S. Zhong,T.-L. Lee, K.S. Fancey, J. Mi: Non-destructive testing and evaluation of composite materials/structures: a state-of-the-art review. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 12, 4 (2014) 1687814020913761. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Gholizadeh: A review of non-destructive testing methods of composite materials. Procedia Structural Integrity 1 (2016) 50–57. [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Ali, A. Abdalla, D. Rifai, M. Faraj: A review on system development in eddy current testing and technique for defect classification and characterization. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems 11, 4 (2017) 330–343. [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Zhang, W. Jackson, G. Dobie, C. Macleod, A. Gachagan: Innovative non-invasive ultrasound method for whisky cask liquid level measurement. Measurement 228 (2024) 114345. [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Qian, G. Xing, P. Yang, P. Hu, L. Zou, T. Koukoulas: Laser-induced ultrasonic measurements for the detection and reconstruction of surface defects. Acta Acustica 5 (2021) 38. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Qin, Y. Lu, Y. Xu, W. He: The calibration methods of hydrophones for underwater environmental sound measurements or biomedical ultrasound measurements: a review. Measurement 242, A (2025) 115700. [Google Scholar]
  10. ASTM International: ASTM E1065/E1065M-14, Standard Guide for Evaluating Characteristics of Ultrasonic Search Units. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. ISO 16811: Non-destructive testing – Ultrasonic testing – Characterization of search unit and sound field. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Ping, X. Guangzhen, H. Longbiao: Calibration of high-frequency hydrophone up to 40 MHz by heterodyne interferometer. Ultrasonics 54 (2014) 402–407. [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Guangzhen, Y. Ping, H. Longbiao, F. Xiujuan: Spatial averaging effects of hydrophone on field characterization of planar transducer using Fresnel approximation. Ultrasonics 71 (2016) 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Xing, P. Yang, P. Hu, K.H. Lam, L. He, Z. Zhang: Field characterization of steady state focused transducers using hydrophones based on Fresnel approximation. Measurement Science and Technology 28 (2017) 065005. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Weber, V. Wilkens: A comparison of different calibration techniques for hydrophones used in medical ultrasonic field measurement. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 68, 5 (2021) 1919–1929. [Google Scholar]
  16. F.S. Foster, G.R. Lockwood, L.K. Ryan, K.A. Harasiewicz, L. Berube, A.M. Rauth: Principles and applications of ultrasound backscatter microscopy. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 40, 5 (1993) 608–617. [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Martin, B. Treeby: Investigation of the repeatability and reproducibility of hydrophone measurements of medical ultrasound fields. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 3 (2019) 1270. [Google Scholar]
  18. E.G. Radulescu, P.A. Lewin, A. Goldstein, A. Nowicki: Hydrophone spatial averaging corrections from 1 to 40 MHz. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 48, 6 (2001) 1575–1580. [Google Scholar]
  19. B.A. Auld: Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids, Vol. 1, 2nd ed. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Wu: Measurement of effective radii of ultrasonic transducers [Ph.D. dissertation]. Philadelphia (PA): Drexel University, 1992. Order No. 30755041. [Google Scholar]
  21. S.M. Nagle, G. Sundar, M.E. Schafer, G.R. Harris, S. Vaezy, J.M. Gessert, S.M. Howard, M.K. Moore, R.M. Eaton: Challenges and regulatory considerations in the acoustic measurement of high-frequency (> 20 MHz) ultrasound. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 32, 11 (2013) 1897–1911. [Google Scholar]
  22. G.R. Harris, S.M. Howard, A.M. Hurrell, P.A. Lewin, M.E. Schafer, K.A. Wear, V. Wilkens, B. Zeqiri: Hydrophone measurement for biomedical ultrasound applications: a review. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 70, 2 (2023) 85–100. [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Cathignol, O.A. Sapozhnikov, J. Zhang: Lamb waves in piezoelectric focused radiator as a reason for discrepancy between O’Neil’s formula and experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 3 (1997)1286–1297. [Google Scholar]
  24. L.E. Kinsler, A.R. Frey, A.B. Coppens, J.V. Sanders: Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  25. M.S. Canney, M.R. Bailey, L.A. Crum, V.A. Khokhlova, O.A. Sapozhnikov: Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: a combined measurement and modeling approach. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124, 4 (2008) 2406–2420. [Google Scholar]
  26. O. Bessonova, V. Wilkens: Membrane hydrophone measurement and numerical simulation of HIFU fields up to developed shock regimes. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 60, 2 (2013) 290–300. [Google Scholar]
  27. H.T. O’Neil: Theory of focusing radiators. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 21, 5 (1949) 516–526. [Google Scholar]
  28. S.O.R. Moheimani, A.J. Fleming: Piezoelectric Transducers for Vibration Control and Damping. Springer, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Adach, R.C. Olivers: A detailed investigation of effective geometrical parameters for weakly focused ultrasonic transducers. Part I: optimization of experimental procedures. Acta Acustica 70, 1 (1990) 12–22. [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Adach, R.C. Chivers: A detailed investigation of effective geometrical parameters for weakly focussed ultrasonic transducers. Part II: A systematic study including an absorbing medium. Acta Acustica 70, 2 (1990) 135–145. [Google Scholar]
  31. R.C. Preston, D.R. Bacon, R.A. Smith: Calibration of medical ultrasonic equipment-procedures and accuracy assessment. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 35, 2 (1988) 110–121. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.