EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 31 References
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Topical Issue - Modern approaches to Active Control of Sound and Vibration
Article Number 31
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026027
Published online 05 May 2026
  1. S.J. Elliott: Signal Processing for Active Control, 1st edn. Signal Processing and Its Applications. Academic Press, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. H.F. Olson, E.G. May: Electronic sound absorber. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 6 (1953) 1130–1136. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Boucher, S.J. Elliott, P.A. Nelson: Effect of errors in the plant model on the performance of algorithms for adaptive feedforward control. IEE Proceedings F (Radar and Signal Processing) 138, 4 (1991) 313. [Google Scholar]
  4. T.J. Sutton, S.J. Elliott, A.M. McDonald, T.J. Saunders: Active control of road noise inside vehicles. Noise Control Engineering Journal 42, 4 (1994) 137–147. [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Jung, S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer: Local active control of road noise inside a vehicle. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 121 (2019) 144–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Buck, D. Sachau: Active headrests with selective delayless subband adaptive filters in an aircraft cabin. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 148 (2021) 107164. [Google Scholar]
  7. J.Y. Oh, H.W. Jung, M.H. Lee, K.H. Lee, Y.J. Kang: Enhancing active noise control of road noise using deep neural network to update secondary path estimate in real time. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 206 (2024) 110940. [Google Scholar]
  8. S.J. Elliott, P. Joseph, A. Bullmore, P.A. Nelson: Active cancellation at a point in a pure tone diffuse sound field. Journal of Sound and Vibration 120, 1 (1988) 183–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S.J. Elliott, J. Garcia-Bonito: Active cancellation of pressure and pressure gradient in a diffuse sound field. Journal of Sound and Vibration 186, 4 (1995) 696–704. [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Joseph, S.J. Elliott, P.A. Nelson: Near field zones of quiet. Journal of Sound and Vibration 172, 5 (1994) 605–627. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Garcia-Bonito, S.J. Elliott, C.C. Boucher: Generation of zones of quiet using a virtual microphone arrangement. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 6 (1997) 3498–3516. [Google Scholar]
  12. S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer: Modeling local active sound control with remote sensors in spatially random pressure fields. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137, 4 (2015) 1936–1946. [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Rafaely, S.J. Elliott, J. Garcia-Bonito: Broadband performance of an active headrest. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106, 2 (1999) 787–793. [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Rafaely: Zones of quiet in a broadband diffuse sound field. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110, 1 (2001) 296–302. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiang, H. Tsuji, H. Ohmori, A. Sano: Adaptation for active noise control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 17, 6 (1997) 36–47. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, W. Ren: Convergence analysis of the multi-variable filtered-X LMS algorithm with application to active noise control. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 47, 4 (1999) 1166–1169. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Cheer, S. Daley: An investigation of delayless subband adaptive filtering for multi-input multi-output active noise control applications. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 25, 2 (2017) 359–373. [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Yin, Z. Zhang, M. Wu, Z. Wang, C. Ma, S. Zhou, J. Yang: Adaptive parallel filter method for active cancellation of road noise inside vehicles. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 193 (2023) 110274. [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Moreau, B. Cazzolato, A. Zander, C. Petersen: A review of virtual sensing algorithms for active noise control. Algorithms 1, 2 (2008) 69–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S.J. Elliott, W. Jung, J. Cheer: Causality and robustness in the remote sensing of acoustic pressure, with application to local active sound control, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, Brighton, United Kingdom, 2019, pp. 8484–8488. [Google Scholar]
  21. W. Jung, S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer: Combining the remote microphone technique with head-tracking for local active sound control. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142, 1 (2017) 298–307. [Google Scholar]
  22. C.D. Petersen, B.S. Cazzolato, A.C. Zander, C.H. Hansen: Active noise control at a moving location using virtual sensing, in: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Sound and Vibration (ICSV13). ICSV. Vol. 13, Vienna, Austria, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Veronesi, C.K. Lai, J. Cheer: Interpolation between plant responses in a head-tracked local active noise control headrest system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 240 (2025) 113401. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Koyama, J. Brunnström, H. Ito, N. Ueno, H. Saruwatari: Spatial active noise control based on kernel interpolation of sound field. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 29 (2021) 3052–3063. [Google Scholar]
  25. C.K. Lai, J. Cheer: A comparison between spatial interpolation approaches in a head-tracked active headrest system, in: Proceedings of the 11th Convention of the European Acoustics Association Forum Acusticum/EuroNoise 2025. European Acoustics Association, Málaga, Spain, 2025, pp. 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  26. Q. Kong, Y. Cao, T. Iqbal, Y. Wang, W. Wang, M.D. Plumbley: PANNs: large-scale pretrained audio neural networks for audio pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 28 (2020) 2880–2894. [Google Scholar]
  27. DCASE: DCASE2025 Challenge - DCASE, https://dcase.community/challenge2025/index. [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Xie, A. Tu, C. Shi, S. Elliott, H. Li, L. Zhang: Cognitive virtual sensing technique for feedforward active noise control, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Seoul, Korea, 2024, pp. 981–985. [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Wang, D. Shi, Z. Luo, X. Shen, J. Ji, W.-S. Gan: Transferable selective virtual sensing active noise control technique based on metric learning, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Hyderabad, India, 2025, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Fernandez-Grande, X. Karakonstantis, D. Caviedes-Nozal, P. Gerstoft: Generative models for sound field reconstruction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 153, 2 (2023) 1179–1190. [Google Scholar]
  31. V.S. Paul, N. Hahn, P.A. Nelson: Learning from data-driven sound field estimation using complex-valued neural networks, in: Proceedings of the 11th Convention of the European Acoustics Association Forum Acusticum/EuroNoise 2025. European Acoustics Association, Málaga, Spain, 2025, pp. 4343–4350. [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Koyama, J.G.C. Ribeiro, T. Nakamura, N. Ueno, M. Pezzoli: Physics-informed machine learning for sound field estimation: fundamentals, state of the art, and challenges. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 41, 6 (2024) 60–71. [Google Scholar]
  33. Y.A. Zhang, F. Ma, T.D. Abhayapala, P.N. Samarasinghe, A. Bastine: An active noise control system based on soundfield interpolation using a physics-informed neural network, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Seoul, Korea, 2024, pp. 506–510. [Google Scholar]
  34. S.-C. Huang, C.-H. Ma, Y.-C. Hsu, M.R. Bai: Feedforward active noise global control using a linearly constrained beamforming approach. Journal of Sound and Vibration 537 (2022) 117190. [Google Scholar]
  35. X. Xiao, S. Watanabe, H. Erdogan, L. Lu, J. Hershey, M.L. Seltzer, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, M. Mandel, D. Yu: Deep beamforming networks for multi-channel speech recognition, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Shanghai, China, 2016, pp. 5745–5749. [Google Scholar]
  36. R. Gu, J. Wu, S.-X. Zhang, L. Chen, Y. Xu, M. Yu, D. Su, Y. Zou, D. Yu: End-to-end multi-channel speech separation, 2019, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06286. [Google Scholar]
  37. D. Lee, S. Kim, J.-W. Choi: Inter-channel Conv-TasNet for multichannel speech enhancement, 2021, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04312. [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Kim: Remote microphone sound-field virtual sensing method using neural network for active noise control system, Master’s thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  39. Roure, A. Albarrazin: The remote microphone technique for active noise control, in: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 1999, pp. 1233–1244. [Google Scholar]
  40. F. Holzmüller, A. Sontacchi: Pilot study on virtual sensing for active noise control, in: Proceedings of DAS/DAGA 2025. Vol. 51. DAGA e.V., Copenhagen, Denmark, 2025, pp. 744–747. [Google Scholar]
  41. F. Holzmüller, A. Sontacchi: Deep observation filter for virtual sensing in local active noise control, in: Proceedings of the 11th Convention of the European Acoustics Association Forum Acusticum/EuroNoise 2025. European Acoustics Association, Málaga, Spain, 2025, pp. 105–112. [Google Scholar]
  42. F. Holzmüller, A. Sontacchi: Obs-TasNet: code, checkpoints, and results, Zenodo, 2026, https://zenodo.org/records/18872900. [Google Scholar]
  43. C. Antoñanzas, M. Ferrer, M. de Diego, A. Gonzalez: Remote microphone technique for active noise control over distributed networks. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 31 (2023) 1522–1535. [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Kim, M.E. Altinsoy: A complementary effect in active control of powertrain and road noise in the vehicle interior. IEEE Access 10 (2022) 27 121-27 135. [Google Scholar]
  45. D. Treyer, S. Gaulocher, S. Germann, E. Curiger: Towards the implementation of the noise-cancelling office chair: algorithms and practical aspects, in: Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV23), Athens, Greece, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  46. Y. Luo, N. Mesgarani: Conv-TasNet: surpassing ideal time-Frequency magnitude masking for speech separation. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 27, 8 (2019) 1256–1266. [Google Scholar]
  47. C. Lea, R. Vidal, A. Reiter, G.D. Hager: Temporal convolutional networks: a unified approach to action segmentation, in: G. Hua, H. Jégou, Eds. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Vol. 14. Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016, pp. 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  48. F. Chollet: Xception: deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2017, pp. 1800–1807. [Google Scholar]
  49. D.S. Williamson, Y. Wang, D. Wang: Complex ratio masking for monaural speech separation. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 24, 3 (2016) 483–492. [Google Scholar]
  50. T.N. Sainath, R.J. Weiss, K.W. Wilson, A. Narayanan, M. Bacchiani, A. Senior: Speaker location and microphone spacing invariant acoustic modeling from raw multichannel waveforms, in: IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU). IEEE, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 2015, pp. 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  51. D. Haider, F. Perfler, V. Lostanlen, M. Ehler, P. Balazs: Hold me tight: stable encoder-decoder design for speech enhancement, in: Interspeech 2024. ISCA, Kos Island, Greece, 2024, pp. 5013–5017. [Google Scholar]
  52. Y. Luo, N. Mesgarani: TaSNet: time-domain audio separation network for real-time, single-channel speech separation, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Calgary, AL, Canada, 2018, pp. 696–700. [Google Scholar]
  53. J.L. Ba, J.R. Kiros, G.E. Hinton: Layer normalization, 2016, https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06450. [Google Scholar]
  54. Y. Wu, K. He: Group normalization, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Vol. 15. Springer, Munich, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  55. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun: Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, Santiago, Chile, 2015, pp. 1026–1034. [Google Scholar]
  56. Grimm, J. Luberadzka, V. Hohmann: A toolbox for rendering virtual acoustic environments in the context of audiology. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 105, 3 (2019) 566–578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. P. Guiraud, S. Hafezi, P.A. Naylor, A.H. Moore, J. Donley, V. Tourbabin, T. Lunner: An introduction to the speech enhancement for augmented reality (spear) challenge, in: IEEE International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC). Vol. 17. IEEE, Bamberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  58. S. Braun, I. Tashev: Data augmentation and loss normalization for deep noise suppression, in: A. Karpov, R. Potapova, Eds. Speech and Computer. Springer International Publishing, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2020, pp. 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  59. A.V. Oppenheim, R.W. Schafer: Discrete-Time Signal Processing, 3rd edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  60. D.P. Kingma, J. Ba: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization, in: International Conference on Learning Representation (ICLR). Vol. 3, San Diega, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  61. P.D. Welch: The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 15, 2 (1967) 70–73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhang, S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer: Robust performance of virtual sensing methods for active noise control. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 152 (2021) 107453. [Google Scholar]
  63. S. Elliott, I. Stothers, P. Nelson: A multiple error LMS algorithm and its application to the active control of sound and vibration. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 35, 10 (1987) 1423–1434. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.