EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 51 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 51
Number of page(s) 23
Section Musical Acoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026048
Published online 19 June 2026
  1. A. Chaigne, J. Kergomard: Acoustics of Musical Instruments. Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing. Springer, New York, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Wolfe: The acoustics of woodwind musical instruments. Acoustics Today 14, 1 (2018) 50–56. [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Gibiat, F. Laloë: Acoustical impedance measurements by the two-microphone-three-calibration (TMTC) method. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88, 6 (1990) 2533–2545. [Google Scholar]
  4. C.A. Macaluso, J.-P. Dalmont: Trumpet with near-perfect harmonicity: design and acoustic results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 1 (2011) 404–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Ossman, H. Pichler, G. Widholm: BIAS: a computer-aided test system for brass wind instruments, in: Audio Engineering Society Convention 87. Audio Engineering Society, 1989. URL: http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=5860. [Google Scholar]
  6. M.L. Jeanneteau, P. Oumaziz, J.-C. Passieux, V. Gibiat, J. Cottier: Numerical modeling of a saxophone and comparison with experimental measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155, 3_Supplement (2024) A150. [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Fréour, L. Guillot, H. Masuda, C. Vergez, B. Cochelin: Parameter identification of a physical model of brass instruments by constrained continuation. Acta Acustica 6 (2022) 9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Ernoult, C. Vergez, S. Missoum, P. Guillemain, M. Jousserand: Woodwind instrument design optimization based on impedance characteristics with geometric constraints. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, 5 (2020) 2864–2877. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Guilloteau, P. Guillemain, J. Kergomard, M. Jousserand: On the second register’s playability of the clarinet: towards a multicriteria approach, in: International Symposium on Musical Acoustics, Montreal, 2017, pp. 1. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Cottier, V. Gibiat, J. Selmer: Impedance analysis on a real instrument and its impact on the manufacturing process, in: International Symposium on Music Acoustics (ISMA), Le Mans, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Guilloteau: Conception d’une clarinette logique. Ph.D. thesis, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France, 2015. URL: https://www.theses.fr/2015AIXM4740. [Google Scholar]
  12. Computational Fluid Dynamics Committee, Eds.: Guide: Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations (AIAA G-077-1998(2002)). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Washington, DC, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  13. L.E. Schwer: An overview of the ASME V &V-10 guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics, in: 20th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, 2009, pp. 1–10. URL: https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/a45e16f4-5cce-44f4-b2bd-fa760019c8aa/content. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Lefebvre: Computational acoustic methods for the design of woodwind instruments. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, 2010. URL: http://www.ewp.rpi.edu/hartford/~ernesto/F2011/EP/MaterialsforStudents/Froling/Lefebvre-Thesis-2010.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Eveno: L’impédance d’entrée pour l’aide á la facture des instruments de musique á vent: mesures, modéles et lien avec les fréquences de jeu. Ph.D. thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie – Paris VI, Université Pierre et Marie Curie – Paris VI. URL: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00787322/document. [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Hélie, T. Hézard, R. Mignot, D. Matignon: One-dimensional acoustic models of horns and comparison with measurements. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 99, 6 (2013) 960–974. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Viala, M.A. Pérez, V. Placet, A. Manjón, E. Foltête, S. Cogan: Towards model-based approaches for musical instruments making: validation of the model of a Spanish guitar soundboard and characterization features proposal. Applied Acoustics 172 (2021) 107591. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Viala, Y. Ben-Haim, S. Vaiedelich, S. Cogan: Value of information in the conservation of a heritage cello: an info-gap decision theory approach. Journal of Cultural Heritage 71 (2025) 165–174. [Google Scholar]
  19. J.-P. Dalmont, C. Nederveen, N. Joly: Radiation impedance of tubes with different flanges: numerical and experimental investigations. Journal of Sound and Vibration 244, 3 (2001) 505–534. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Ernoult: Effect of air humidity and carbon dioxide in the sound propagation for the modeling of wind musical instruments. Research Report RR-9500, Inria, 2023. URL: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-04008847. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Ernoult, J. Chabassier, S. Rodriguez, A. Humeau: Full waveform inversion for bore reconstruction of woodwind-like instruments. Acta Acustica 5, 47 (2021) 1–15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. J.-P. Dalmont, J.C.L. Roux: A new impedance sensor for wind instruments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123, 5 (2008) 3014–3014. [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Dickens, J. Smith, J. Wolfe: Improved precision in measurements of acoustic impedance spectra using resonance-free calibration loads and controlled error distribution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121, 3 (2007) 1471–1481. [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Zwikker, C.W. Kosten: Sound Absorbing Materials. Elsevier, 1949. [Google Scholar]
  25. D.H. Keefe: Acoustical wave propagation in cylindrical ducts: transmission line parameter approximations for isothermal and nonisothermal boundary conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75, 1 (1984) 58–62. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Thibault, J. Chabassier, H. Boutin, T. Hélie: Transmission line coefficients for viscothermal acoustics in conical tubes. Journal of Sound and Vibration 543 (2023) 117355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. F. Silva, P. Guillemain, J. Kergomard, B. Mallaroni, A.N. Norris: Approximation formulae for the acoustic radiation impedance of a cylindrical pipe. Journal of Sound and Vibration 322, 1–2 (2009) 255–263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Itemm: Plateforme d’aide á la facture instrumentale. pafi.plateforme-lutherie.com, 2020. URL: pafi.plateforme-lutherie.com. [Google Scholar]
  29. Openwind: Open Wind INstrument Design, 2024. URL: https://openwind.inria.fr/. [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Chabassier, A. Ernoult, O. Geber, A. Thibault, T. Van Baarsel: Open Wind INstrument Design, 2021. URL: https://openwind.gitlabpages.inria.fr/web/. [Google Scholar]
  31. R. Tournemenne, J. Chabassier: A comparison of a one-dimensional finite element method and the transfer matrix method for the computation of wind music instrument impedance. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 105, 5 (2019) 838–849. [Google Scholar]
  32. V. Pagneux, N. Amir, J. Kergomard: A study of wave propagation in varying cross-section waveguides by modal decomposition. Part I. Theory and validation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 4 (1996) 2034–2048. [Google Scholar]
  33. T. Guennoc, J.-B. Doc, S. Félix: Improved multimodal formulation of the wave propagation in a 3D waveguide with varying cross-section and curvature. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149, 1 (2021) 476–486. [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Bruneau, M. Bruneau, P. Herzog, J. Kergomard: Boundary layer attenuation of higher order modes in waveguides. Journal of Sound and Vibration 119, 1 (1987) 15–27. [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Félix, J.-B. Doc, M.A. Boucher: Modeling of the multimodal radiation from an open-ended waveguide. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143, 6 (2018) 3520–3528. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Duruflé: Intégration numérique et éléments finis d’ordre élevé appliqués aux équations de Maxwell en régime harmonique. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Dauphine, Paris, 2006. URL: https://pastel.hal.science/tel-00068590/document. [Google Scholar]
  37. W.R. Kampinga, Y.H. Wijnant, A. de Boer: An efficient finite element model for viscothermal acoustics. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 97, 4 (2011) 618–631. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. L. Cremer: On the acoustic boundary layer outside a rigid wall. Archiv der Elektrischen Übertragung 2 (1948) 235. [Google Scholar]
  39. J. Chabassier, A. Thibault: Viscothermal models for wind musical instruments. Research Report 9356, Inria, 2020. URL: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02917351/. [Google Scholar]
  40. R. Lehr: Sixteen S-squared over D-squared: a relation for crude sample size estimates. Statistics in Medicine 11, 8 (1992) 1099–1102. [Google Scholar]
  41. J.-P. Dalmont: Acoustic impedance measurement, Part I: a review. Journal of Sound and Vibration 243, 3 (2001) 427–439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. B.L. Welch: The generalization of ‘student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34, 1/2 (1947) 28–35. [Google Scholar]
  43. H. Boutin, S. Le Conte, S. Vaiedelich, B. Fabre, J.-L. Le Carrou: Acoustic dissipation in wooden pipes of different species used in wind instrument making: an experimental study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 4 (2017) 2840–2848. [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Thibault: Modélisation, analyse et simulation de l’acoustique dissipative dans les tubes poreux ou rugueux: application aux instruments á vent. These de doctorat, Pau, 2023. URL: https://theses.fr/2023PAUU3051. [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Ernoult, R. Viala, J. Cabaret, J. Chabassier, T. Colinot, J.-B. Doc, J.-P. Dalmont, V. Fréour: Acoustic impedance of 180mm long pipes: simulations and measurements, 2026. URL: https://zenodo.org/uploads/18624541. [Google Scholar]
  46. A. Ernoult: Acoustic Impedance Benchmark, GitLab, 2026. URL: https://gitlab.inria.fr/aernoult/acoustic-impedance-benchmark. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.