Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 47
Number of page(s) 23
Section Musical Acoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026042
Published online 19 June 2026
  1. H. von Helmholtz: On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music. Reprinted by Dover, New York, 1954, p. 1862. [Google Scholar]
  2. C.V. Raman: On the mechanical theory of the vibrations of bowed strings and of musical instruments of the violin family, with experimental verification of the results. Part I. Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Bulletin 15 (1918) 1–158. [Google Scholar]
  3. M.E. McIntyre, R.T. Schumacher, J. Woodhouse: New results on the bowed string. Catgut Acoustical Society Newsletter 28 (1977) 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  4. M.E. McIntyre, J. Woodhouse: On the fundamentals of bowed string dynamics. Acustica 43, 2 (1979) 93–109. [Google Scholar]
  5. M.E. McIntyre, R.T. Schumacher, J. Woodhouse: On the oscillations of musical instruments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74, 5 (1983) 1325–1345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Olsson: Control systems with friction. Ph.D. thesis, Lund Institute of Technology (LTH), 1996. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Lazarus: Die Behandlung der selbsterregten Kippschwingungen der gestrichenen Saite mit Hilfe der endlichen Laplacetransformation. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Berlin, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Smith, J. Woodhouse: The tribology of rosin. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 48 (2000) 1633–1681. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Galluzzo: On the playability of stringed instruments. Ph.D. thesis, Trinity College, University of Cambridge, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Woodhouse: Bowed string simulation using a thermal friction model. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 89 (2003) 355–368. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Woodhouse: The acoustics of the violin: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 11 (2014) 115901. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Galluzzo, J. Woodhouse, H. Mansour: Assessing friction laws for simulating bowed-string motion. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 103, 6 (2017) 1080–1099. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Woodhouse, P. Galluzzo: Enhanced tribological modelling of violin rosin. Tribology Letters 73, 128 (2025) 12. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Woodhouse: The science of musical instruments, 2026. https://euphonics.org [Accessed: 2026-01-12]. [Google Scholar]
  15. J.R. Rice, N. Lapusta, K. Ranjith: Rate and state dependent friction and the stability of sliding between elastically deformable solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 49, 9 (2001) 1865–1898. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Champneys, P.L. Várkonyi: The Painlevé paradox in contact mechanics. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics 81 (2016) 538–588. [Google Scholar]
  17. S.J. Hogan, K.U. Kristiansen: On the regularization of impact without collision: the Painlevé paradox and compliance. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 473, 2202 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. F.G. Friedlander: On the oscillations of a bowed string. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 49 (1953) 516–530. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. R.T. Schumacher, S. Garoff, J. Woodhouse: Probing the physics of slip-stick friction using a bowed string. Journal of Adhesion 81 (2007) 723–750. [Google Scholar]
  20. R.T. Schumacher, J. Woodhouse: The transient behaviour of models of bowed-string motion. Chaos 5, 3 (1994) 509–523. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Serafin, F. Avanzini, D. Rocchesso: Bowed string simulations using an elasto-plastic friction model, in: Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Accoustics Conference, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Willemsen, S. Bilbao, S. Serafin: Real-time implementation of an elasto-plastic friction model applied to stiff strings using finite-difference schemes, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, 2019, pp. 40–46. [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Matusiak, V. Chatziioannou: A comparison of friction models for bow-string interaction based on experimental measurements, in: Proceedings of International Symposium on Musical Acoustics, Vol. 6, 2023, pp. 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Dupont, B. Armstrong, V. Hayward: Elasto-plastic friction model: contact compliance and stiction, in: Proceedings of 2000 ACC. IEEE, Chicago, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Dupont, V. Hayward, B. Armstrong, F. Altpeter: Single state elasto-plastic friction models. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 47, 5 (2002) 787–792. [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Canudas de Wit, H. Olsson, K. Åström, P. Lischinsky: A new model for control of systems with friction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 40, 3 (1995) 419–425. [Google Scholar]
  27. E. Matusiak, V. Chatziioannou: Elasto-plastic friction modeling toward reconstructing measured bowed-string transients. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156, 2 (2024) 1135–1147. [Google Scholar]
  28. E. Matusiak, V. Chatziioannou, M. van Walstijn: Numerical modelling of elasto-plastic friction in bow-string interaction with guaranteed passivity. Frontiers in Signal Processing 5 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Matusiak, V. Chatziioannou, M. van Walstijn: A refined bow-string interaction model considering hysteresis. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 58, 1 (2025) 10. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Demoucron: On the control of virtual violins physical modelling and control of bowed string instruments. Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  31. O.J.P.F. Inácio: A modal method for the simulation of nonlinear dynamical systems with application to bowed musical instruments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  32. R. Pitteroff, J. Woodhouse: Mechanics of the contact area between a violin bow and a string. Part I: reflection and transmission behaviour. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 84 (1998) 543–562. [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Desvages, S. Bilbao, M. Ducceschi: Improved frequency-dependent damping for time domain modelling of linear string vibration, in: Proceedings of the International Congress on Acoustics Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Johanastrom, C. Canudas de Wit: Revisiting the LuGre friction model. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 28, 6 (2008) 101–114. [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Dahl: A solid friction model. Technical report, The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  36. C. Canudas de Wit, P. Tsiotras: Dynamic tire friction models for vehicle traction control, in: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 4, 1999, pp. 3746–3751. [Google Scholar]
  37. F. Marques, Ł. Woliński, M. Wojtyra, P. Flores, H.M. Lankarani: An investigation of a novel LuGre-based friction force model. Mechanism and Machine Theory 166 (2021) 104493. [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Koopman, D. Jeltsema, M. Verhaegen: Port-Hamiltonian description and analysis of the LuGre friction model. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 19, 3 (2011) 959–968. [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Lampis, A. Mayer, V. Chatziioannou: Assessing playability limits of bowed-string transients using experimental measurements. Acta Acustica 8 (2024) 44. [Google Scholar]
  40. F.P. Bowden, D. Tabor: The Friction and Lubrication of Solids. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1950, re-published by Oxford University Press in 2001. [Google Scholar]
  41. J.A. Greenwood, J.B.P. Williamson: Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 295, 1442 (1966) 300–319. [Google Scholar]
  42. F. Ablitzer, N. Dauchez, J.P. Dalmont: A predictive model for the adjustment of violin bows. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 98, 4 (2012) 640–650. [Google Scholar]
  43. C. Valette: Mechanics of vibrating strings, in: A. Hirschberg, J. Kergomard, G. Weinreich (Eds.). Mechanics of Musical Instruments, 1995, pp. 115–183. [Google Scholar]
  44. J. Woodhouse: Plucked guitar transients: comparison of measurements and synthesis. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 90 (2004) 945–965. [Google Scholar]
  45. J. Woodhouse, A.R. Loach: Torsional behaviour of cello strings. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 85 (1999) 734–740. [Google Scholar]
  46. L. Barreira, C. Valls: Ordinary Differential Equations: Qualitative Theory. American Mathematical Society, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  47. J.C. Schelleng: The bowed string and the player. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 53 (1973) 26–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. A. Mayer, A. Lampis: A versatile monochord setup: an industrial robotic arm as bowing and plucking device. Technical report, University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  49. A. Lampis, V. Chatziioannou, G. Scavone: Experimental analysis of cello string types: influence on playability and tonal characteristics using Schelleng diagrams, in: International Symposium on Music and Room Acoustics, 2025, p. 035013. [Google Scholar]
  50. A. Lampis, A. Mayer, V. Chatziioannou: An experimental approach for comparing the influence of cello string type on bowed attack response. JASA Express Letters 4 (2024) 113201. [Google Scholar]
  51. E. Schoonderwaldt, K. Guettler, A. Askenfelt: An empirical investigation of bow-force limits in the Schelleng diagram. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 94 (2008) 604–622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. P. Galluzzo, J. Woodhouse: High-performance bowing machine tests of bowed-string transients. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 100 (2014) 139–153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. E. Schoonderwaldt: The violinist’s sound palette: spectral centroid, pitch flattening and anomalous low frequencies. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 95 (2009) 901–914. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. H. Mansour, J. Woodhouse, G. Scavone: Enhanced wave-based modelling of musical strings. Part 2: bowed strings. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 102 (2016) 1094–1107. [Google Scholar]
  55. V. Chatziioannou, M. van Walstijn, A. Lampis: Simulating bow-string transients using a thermal elasto-plastic friction model, in: The International Symposium on Musical Acoustics, Helsinki, Finland, 2026. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.