Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 52
Number of page(s) 19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026050
Published online 30 June 2026
  1. Dunn, F., Hartmann, W.M., Campbell, D.M., Fletcher, N.H.: Springer Handbook of Acoustics. Springer, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gazengel, B., Dalmont, J.-P.: Mechanical response characterisation of saxophone reeds, in: Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, Aalborg, Denmark, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell, M., Gilbert, J., Myers, A.: The Science of Brass Instruments. Springer, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ribble, D.B.: The shakuhachi and the ney: a comparison of two flutes from the far reaches of Asia. Minutes of Kochi Medical University 19 (2003) 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yarkın, N., Tan, A.: A study of the reference pitches in Ottoman-Turkish music through an analysis of historical neys. Ethnomusicology Journal 4, 2 (2021) 273–286. [Google Scholar]
  6. Akahoshi, H., Obataya, E.: Effects of wet-dry cycling on the mechanical properties of Arundo donax L. used for the vibrating reed in woodwind instruments. Wood Science and Technology 49, 6 (2015) 1171–1183. [Google Scholar]
  7. Weidenfeller, B., Lambri, O.A., Bonifacich, F.G., Arlic, U., Gargicevich, D.: Damping of the woodwind instrument reed material Arundo donax L. Materials Research 21 (2018) e20170795. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gedik, A.C., Bozkurt, B.: Evaluation of the Makam scale theory of Arel for music information retrieval on traditional Turkish art music. Journal of New Music Research 38, 2 (2009) 103–116. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wimmer, B., Gómez, E.: Temporal evolution of Makam and Usul relationship in Turkish Makam. Musicological Annual 58, 2 (2022) 107–119. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wolfe, J.: The acoustics of woodwind musical instruments. Acoustics Today 14, 1 (2018) 50–56. [Google Scholar]
  11. Damodaran, A., Mansour, H., Lessard, L., Scavone, G., Babu, A.S.: Application of composite materials to the chenda, an Indian percussion instrument. Applied Acoustics 88 (2015) 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Quintavalla, M., Gabrielli, F., Canevari, C.: Grading materials for stringed instruments soundboards: an approach considering the orthotropic elastic and damping properties. Applied Acoustics 187 (2022) 108521. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brezas, S., Katsipis, M., Orphanos, Y., Kaselouris, E., Kechrakos, K., Kefaloyannis, N., Hapadaki, H., Sarantis-Karamesinis, A., Petrakis, S., Theodorakis, I., Iliadis, E.: An integrated method for the vibroacoustic evaluation of a carbon fiber bouzouki. Applied Sciences 13, 7 (2023) 4585. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brauchler, A., Gonzalez, S., Vierneisel, M., Ziegler, P., Antonacci, F., Sarti, A., Eberhard, P.: Model-predicted geometry variations to compensate material variability in the design of classical guitars. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) 12766. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brauchler, A., Hose, D., Ziegler, P., Hanss, M., Eberhard, P.: Distinguishing geometrically identical instruments: possibilistic identification of material parameters in a parametrically model order reduced finite element model of a classical guitar. Journal of Sound and Vibration 535 (2022) 117071. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Viala, R., Placet, V., Cogan, S.: Model-based evidence of the dominance of the guitar brace design over material and climatic variability for dynamic behaviours. Applied Acoustics 182 (2021) 108275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Viala, R., Pérez, M.A., Placet, V., Manjón, A., Foltête, E., Cogan, S.: Towards model-based approaches for musical instruments making: validation of the model of a Spanish guitar soundboard and characterisation features proposal. Applied Acoustics 172 (2021) 107591. [Google Scholar]
  18. Viala, R., Placet, V., Foltête, E., Cogan, S.: Model based ranking of the influence of geometry and materials on the dynamical behavior of the violin highlights predominance of geometrical choices. Scientific Reports 14 (2024) 29589. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ernoult, A., Chabassier, J., Rodriguez, S., Humeau, A.: Full waveform inversion for bore reconstruction of woodwind-like instruments. Acta Acustica 5 (2021) 47. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Noreland, D., Kergomard, J., Laloë, F., Vergez, C., Guillemain, P., Guilloteau, A.: The logical clarinet: numerical optimisation of the geometry of woodwind instruments. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 99 (2013) 615–628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cabaret, J., Dalmont, J.-P., Ernoult, A., Fréour, V., Viala, R.: Creation of an experimental database, for the validation of resonator models, comparison of geometries and materials, and quantification of measurement errors, in: Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, Turin, Italy, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  22. Couineaux, F., Ablitzer, F., Gautier, F.: Minimal physical model of the cristal Baschet. Acta Acustica 7 (2023) 49. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Aversano, G., D’Alessio, G., Coussement, A., Contino, F., Parente, A.: Combination of polynomial chaos and Kriging for a reduced-order model of reacting flow applications. Results in Engineering 10 (2021) 100223. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schöbi, R., Sudret, B., Marelli, S.: Rare event estimation using polynomial-chaos kriging. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems. Part A: Civil Engineering 3, 2 (2017) D4016002. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou, T., Peng, Y.: Reliability analysis using adaptive polynomial-chaos kriging and probability density evolution method. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 220 (2022) 108283. [Google Scholar]
  26. Atıcı, B.M., Bozkurt, B.: A culture-specific analysis software for Makam music traditions, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Folk Music Analysis (FMA), Paris, France, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, D.S., Fritzen, C.P., Li, H.N.: Extended MinMAC algorithm and comparison of sensor placement methods, in: Proceedings of IMAC-XXVI, Orlando, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  28. Allemang, R.J., Phillips, A.W.: Experimental modal parameter evaluation methods, in: R. Allemang, P. Avitabile (Eds.). Handbook of Experimental Structural Dynamics. Springer, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  29. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Wood Handbook – Wood as an Engineering Material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Madison, WI, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fiore, V., Scalici, T., Valenza, A.: Characterisation of a new natural fiber from Arundo donax L. as potential reinforcement of polymer composites. Carbohydrate Polymers 106 (2014) 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  31. MatWeb Material Property Data, www.matweb.com (accessed 2025). [Google Scholar]
  32. Mottershead, J.E., Link, M., Friswell, M.I., Schedlinski, C.: Model updating, in: R. Allemang, P. Avitabile (Eds.). Handbook of Experimental Structural Dynamics. Springer, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  33. Marelli, S., Sudret, B.: UQLab: a framework for uncertainty quantification in MATLAB, in: Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk: Quantification, Mitigation, and Management. ASCE, 2014, pp. 2554–2563. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tan, A.: The problem of extra node on the ney instrument. PESA International Journal of Social Sciences 4, 1 (2018) 142–147. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.