Open Access
Table 2
Summary of experimental results.
Parameter | Variable value | Absorption coefficient or performance description |
---|---|---|
Porosity/% | 75 | Absorption coefficient gradually increases, but with low effectiveness |
85 | Further improvement in absorption coefficient | |
95 | Optimal absorption effect, significant increase in low-frequency absorption coefficient | |
Thickness/mm | 5 | Low absorption coefficient |
8 | Increased absorption coefficient, shifted towards lower frequencies | |
11 | Optimal absorption effect, multiple absorption peaks appear | |
Density/(kg/m3) | 0.15 | Second absorption valley frequency f3 is higher |
0.25 | f3 shifts towards lower frequencies | |
0.35 | f3 continues to shift towards lower frequencies, but with insignificant change | |
Size/mm | 16 | Good absorption effect |
21 | Decreased absorption performance | |
26 | Significantly reduced absorption performance | |
Tension force/(N/m) | 110 | Lower characteristic frequency |
130 | Characteristic frequency shifts towards higher frequencies | |
160 | Highest characteristic frequency, significant impact | |
Young’s modulus/Pa | 3.5e9 | Sound insulation peak at 30 Hz |
2.1e9 | Sound insulation peak shifts towards lower frequencies | |
1.1e9 | Sound insulation peak moves to 110 Hz, reduced bandwidth | |
Poisson’s ratio | 0.25 | Low-frequency attenuation signal absorption curve slightly shifts towards lower frequencies |
0.35 | Curves almost coincide, peak at 65 dB | |
0.45 | Curve continues to shift towards higher frequencies, but with insignificant change | |
Frame material | Photosensitive Resin | Slightly lower sound insulation compared to other materials |
Aluminum | Slightly higher sound insulation than photosensitive resin | |
Steel | Slightly higher sound insulation, but with overall minor impact | |
Mass Block Contact Area with Membrane/mm2 | 3.5 | Low absorption effect |
4.5 | Improved absorption effect | |
5.5 | Optimal absorption effect |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.