Open Access
Scientific Article
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 5, 2021
Article Number 56
Number of page(s) 14
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2021050
Published online 21 December 2021
  1. A. De Cheveigné: Pitch perception models, in Pitch, Springer, New York, NY. 2005, pp. 169–233. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Josupeit, V. Hohmann: Modeling speech localization, talker identification, and word recognition in a multi-talker setting. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142, 1 (2017) 35–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Kawahara, M. Morise, T. Takahashi, R. Nisimura, T. Irino, H. Banno: Tandem-STRAIGHT: A temporally stable power spectral representation for periodic signals and applications to interference-free spectrum, F0, and aperiodicity estimation, in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE. 2008, March, pp. 3933–3936. [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Gold, N. Morgan, D. Ellis: Speech and audio signal processing: Processing and perception of speech and music. John Wiley & Sons, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Nakazawa, K. Umeno: Fundamental study on almost periodic frequency arrangements for super-multi-access radio communication systems. IEICE Communications Express 6 (2017) 673–678. https://doi.org/10.1587/comex.2017XBL0135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Han, M. Luo, X. Zhao, J.M. Guerrero, L. Xu: Comparative performance evaluation of orthogonal-signal-generators-based single-phase PLL algorithms – A survey. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 31, 5 (2015) 3932–3944. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Yanchuk, P. Perlikowski: Delay and periodicity. Physical Review E 79, 4 (2009) 046221. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. R.E. Best: Phase-locked loops: Design, simulation, and applications. McGraw-Hill Education, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Razavi: The delay-locked loop [A circuit for all seasons]. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine 10, 3 (2018) 9–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J.J. Spilker, D.T. Magill: The delay-lock discriminator-an optimum tracking device. Proceedings of the IRE 49, 9 (1961) 1403–1416. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Xanthopoulos: Digital delay lock techniques, in Clocking in Modern VLSI Systems. Integrated Circuits and Systems, Xanthopoulos T, Ed., Springer, Boston, MA. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0261-0_6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Li, L. Xue, P. Hazucha, T. Karnik, R. Bashirullah: A delay-locked loop synchronization scheme for high-frequency multiphase hysteretic DC-DC converters. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 44, 11 (2009) 3131–3145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Böhler, U. Zölzer: Monophonic pitch detection by evaluation of individually parameterized phase locked loops, in 19th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX16), Vol. 68. 2016, September. [Google Scholar]
  14. R.M. Bittner, A. Wang, J.P. Bello: Pitch contour tracking in music using Harmonic Locked Loops, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE. 2017, March, pp. 191–195. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. de Cheveigné: Separation of concurrent harmonic sounds: Fundamental frequency estimation and a time-domain cancellation model of auditory processing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93, 6 (1993) 3271–3290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. De Cheveigné: Cancellation model of pitch perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103, 3 (1998) 1261–1271. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. R.D. Patterson, M.H. Allerhand, C. Giguere: Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: A modular architecture and a software platform. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98, 4 (1995) 1890–1894. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. V. Hohmann: Raw data and scripts for “The Period-Modulated Harmonic Locked Loop (PM-HLL): A low-effort algorithm for rapid time-domain periodicity estimation”. https://Zenodo.org (2021). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5727729. [Google Scholar]
  19. M.V. Mathews, J.E. Miller, E.E. David Jr: Pitch synchronous analysis of voiced sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33, 2 (1961) 179–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. W.A. Yost: Pitch of iterated rippled noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 1 (1996) 511–518. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. K.J. Woods, J.H. McDermott: Attentive tracking of sound sources. Current Biology 25, 17 (2015) 2238–2246. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. De Cheveigné, H. Kawahara: YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, 4 (2002) 1917–1930. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Krawczyk, T. Gerkmann: STFT phase reconstruction in voiced speech for an improved single-channel speech enhancement. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 22, 12 (2014) 1931–1940. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. O. Das, J.O. Smith, C. Chafe: Real-time pitch tracking in audio signals with the extended complex Kalman filter, in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects. 2017, September, pp. 118–124. [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Luberadzka, H. Kayser, V. Hohmann: Glimpsed periodicity features and recursive Bayesian estimation for modeling attentive voice tracking, in Proc. ICA 2019, Aachen, Germany. 2019, pp. 6569–6576. http://pub.dega-akustik.de/ICA2019/data/articles/000836.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  26. P.X. Joris: Entracking as a brain stem code for pitch: The butte hypothesis, in Physiology, Psychoacoustics and Cognition in Normal and Impaired Hearing, Springer, Cham. 2016, pp. 347–354. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. A. de Cheveigné: ZapLine: A simple and effective method to remove power line artifacts. NeuroImage 207 (2020) 116356. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Jing, X. Wang, L. Lu, L. Zhou, H. Shu, X. Wang, J. Chen: Reconfigurable RF notch filter based on an integrated silicon optical true time delay line. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 52, 19 (2019) 194001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.