Table 1

Macroscopic parameters parameters of melamine foams: Comparison between characterization [8, 9], mono-sized model by Perrot et al. [13], 3-parameter model by Horoshenkov et al. [26] and poly-sized model (this work).

Foam D (μm) CD (–) k0 (×10−10 m2) k0'$ {k}_0^{\prime}$ (×10−10 m2) Λ (μm) Λ′ (μm) α (–)
UF (Gray)
 Characterization 166 0.41 31.47 ± 3.69 75 ± 12 141 ± 14 298 ± 104 1.06 ± 0.03
 Mono-sized model 397 31.47 67 241 450 1.03
 3-parameter model 1.01 12.55 48.31 111.86 2.316
 Poly-sized model 21.76 73.15 124.12 243.89 1.03
TG (Blue)
 Characterization 178 0.42 27.24 ± 1.89 72 ± 13 125 ± 15 254 ± 71 1.07 ± 0.04
 Mono-sized model 369 27.24 58 224 419 1.03
 3-parameter model 1.21 13.54 51.75 115.69 2.23
 Poly-sized model 26.38 89.31 134.36 264.53 1.03
G+ (White)
 Characterization 138 0.36 14.09 ± 0.71 36 ± 6 97 ± 12 187 ± 12 1.08 ± 0.05
 Mono-sized model 265 14.09 30 161 301 1.03
 3-parameter model 1.11 7.94 45.14 86.95 1.926
 Poly-sized model 11.62 37.37 98.62 191.99 1.03

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.