Open Access
Scientific Article
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 5, 2021
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 9
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2020027
Published online 16 December 2020
  1. A.D. Brown, G. Christopher Stecker, D.J. Tollin: The precedence effect in sound localization. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 16, 1 (2015) 1–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Litovsky, B. Shinn-Cunningham: Investigation of the relationship among three common measures of precedence: Fusion, localization dominance, and discrimination suppression. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109, 1 (2001) 346–358. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Kuttruff: Room Acoustics. Taylor & Francis, 5th ed., 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Guski: Auditory localization: Effects of reflecting surfaces. Perception 19, 6 (1990) 819–830. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Rakerd, W.M. Hartmann: Localization of sound in rooms, II: The effects of a single reflecting surface. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 78 (1985) 524–533. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Rakerd, W.M. Hartmann: Localization of sound in rooms, III: Onset and duration effects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80, 6 (1986) 1695–1706. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. T.J. Cox, B.-I.I.L. Dalenback, P. D’Antonio, J.J. Embrechts, J.Y. Jeon, E. Mommertz, M. Vorländer: A tutorial on scattering and diffusion coefficients for room acoustic surfaces. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 92 (2006) 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jens Blauert, P.L. Divenyi: Spectral selectivity in binaural contralateral inhibition. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 66, 5 (1988) 267–274. [Google Scholar]
  9. D.R. Perrott, T. Strybel, C. Manligas: Conditions under which the Haas precedence effect may or may not occur. The Journal of Auditory Research 27 (1987) 59–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Walther, P. Robinson, O. Santala: Effect of spectral overlap on the echo suppression threshold for single reflection conditions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, 2 (2013) EL158–EL164. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. P.W. Robinson, A. Walther, C. Faller, J. Braasch: Echo thresholds for reflections from acoustically diffusive architectural surfaces. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, 4 (2013) 2755. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Grosse, S. van de Par, C. Trahiotis: Stimulus coherence influences sound-field localization and fusion/segregation of leading and lagging sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 4 (2017) 2673–2680. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Visentin, M. Pellegatti, N. Prodi: Effect of a single lateral diffuse reflection on spatial percepts and speech intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, 1 (2020) 122–140. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Lokki, J. Pätynen, S. Tervo, S. Siltanen, L. Savioja: Engaging concert hall acoustics is made up of temporal envelope preserving reflections. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 6 (2011) EL223–EL228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Siltanen, T. Lokki, S. Tervo, L. Savioja: Modeling incoherent reflections from rough room surfaces with image sources. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131, 6 (2012) 4606–4614. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. M.A. Biot: Reflection on a rough surface from an acoustic point source. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29, 11 (1957) 1193–1200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M.A. Biot: On the reflection of acoustic waves on a rough surface. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30, 5 (1958) 479–480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M.R. Schroeder: Binaural dissimilarity and optimum ceilings for concert halls: More lateral sound diffusion. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65 (1979) 958–963. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T.J. Cox, P. D’Antonio: Acoustic Absorber and Diffusers. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Dietsch, W. Kraak: Ein objektives Kriterium zur Erfassung von Echostörungen bei Musik- und Sprachdarbietungen. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 60, 3 (1986) 205–216. [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Rakerd, W.M. Hartmann, J. Hsu: Echo suppression in the horizontal and median saggittal planes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107, 2 (2000) 1061–1064. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R.L. Freyman, R.K. Clifton, R.Y. Litovsky: Dynamic processes in the precedence effect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90, 2 (1991) 874–884. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Levitt: Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 2B (1971) 467–477. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S.A. Klein: Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 8 (2001) 1421–1455. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Daniel: Représentation de champs acoustiques, application à la transmission et à la reproduction de scènes sonores complexes dans un contexte multimédia. PhD thesis, Université Paris 6, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Kohlrausch, R. Kortekaas, M. van der Heijden, S. van de Par, A.J. Oxenham, D. Püschel: Detection of tones in low-noise noise: Further evidence for the role of envelope fluctuations. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 83 (1997) 659–669. [Google Scholar]
  27. H.P. Sepharim: Über die Wahrnehmbarkeit mehrerer Rückwurfe von Sprachschall. Acustica 11, 2 (1961) 80–91. [Google Scholar]
  28. S.S. Sawilowsky: New effect size rules of thumb, The Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8, 2 (2009) 597–599. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. B.G. Shinn-Cunningham, P.M. Zurek, N.I. Durlach: Adjustment and discrimination measurements of the precedence effect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 (1993) 2923–2932. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Fastl, E. Zwicker: Psychoacoustics – Facts and Models. 3rd ed., Hugo Fastl, Eberhard Zwicker, 2006. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.