Acta Acust.
Volume 6, 2022
Topical Issue - Aeroacoustics: state of art and future trends
Article Number 27
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 04 July 2022
  1. A. Agarwal, A.P. Dowling: Low-frequency acoustic shielding by the Silent Aircraft airframe. AIAA Journal 45, 2 (2007) 358–365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Eret, J. Kennedy, F. Amoroso, P. Castellini, G.J. Bennett: Experimental observations of an installed-on-pylon contra-rotating open rotor with equal blade number in pusher and tractor configuration. International Journal of Aeroacoustics 15, 1–2 (2016) 228–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Czech, R.H. Thomas: Open rotor installed aeroacoustic testing with conventional and unconventional airframes, in: 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Berlin, Germany, May 27–29, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. C.J. Bahr, R.H. Thomas, L.V. Lopes, C.L. Burley, D.E. Van Zante: Open rotor tone shielding methods for system noise assessments using multiple databases, in: 52nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, National Harbor, Maryland, 13–17 January, 2014. AIAA. [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Guo, M.J. Czech, R.H. Thomas, Open rotor noise shielding by blended-wing-body aircraft, in: 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Berlin, Germany, May 27–29, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Guo, R.H. Thomas: Experimental study on open rotor noise shielding by Hybrid-Wing-Body aircraft. AIAA Journal 54, 1 (2016) 242–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Dürrwächter, M. Keßler, E. Krämer: Numerical assessment of open-rotor noise shielding with a coupled approach. AIAA Journal 57, 5 (May 2019) 1930–1940. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Lummer, C. Richter, C. Pröber, J. Delfs: Validation of a model for open rotor noise predictions and calculation of shielding effects using a fast BEM, in: 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Berlin, Germany, May 27–29, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Lummer, M. Mößner, J.W. Delfs: Computation and validation of acoustic shielding at realistic aircraft configurations, in: 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, June 25–29, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. D.B. Stephens, E. Envia, Acoustic shielding for a model scale counter-rotation open rotor, 17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (32nd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Portland, Oregon, 05–08 June, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  11. K.M. Li, H.Y. Wong: A review of commonly used analytical and empirical formulae for predicting sound diffracted by a thin screen. Applied Acoustics 66, 1 (2005) 45–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. H.M. Macdonald: A class of diffraction problems. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society s2_14, 1 (1915) 410–427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D.S. Jones: The mathematical theory of noise shielding. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 17 (1977) 149–229. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Roger, S. Moreau, K. Kucukcoskun: On sound scattering by rigid edges and wedges in a flow, with applications to high-lift device aeroacoustics. Journal of Sound and Vibration 362 (2016) 252–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Gradshteyn, I.M. Ryzhik: Table of integrals, series, and products, 5th ed. Academic, London, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Gutin: On the sound field of a rotating propeller. Technical Memorandum 1195, NACA, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, VA, USA, 1948. [Google Scholar]
  17. I.E. Garrick, C.E. Watkins: A theoretical study of the effect of forward speed on the free-space sound-pressure field around propellers. Report 1198, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA). 1953. [Google Scholar]
  18. S.E. Wright: Sound radiation from a lifting rotor generated by asymmetric disk loading. Journal of Sound and Vibration 9, 2 (1969) 223–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Carley: Series expansion for the sound field of rotating sources. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120, 3 (September 2006) 1252–1256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Carley: Series expansion for the sound field of a ring source. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 6 (2010) 3375–3380. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. National Institute of Standards and Technology: Digital library of mathematical functions. 2010. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.