EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2023) Acta Acust., 7 (2023) 6 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 7, 2023
Article Number 6
Number of page(s) 15
Section Environmental Noise
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2022059
Published online 07 February 2023
  1. European Environment Agency: Environmental noise in Europe – 2020, 2020. No. 22/2019 [Google Scholar]
  2. European Union: Directive 2002/49/EC relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (END), no. L189, Official Journal of the European Communities, 2002:12–25 Available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002L0049 from=EN. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ö. Axelsson: Soundscape revisited. Journal of Urban Design 25, 5 (2020) 551–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1810006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. BS ISO 12913-1:2014: Acoustics – Soundscape part 1: Definition and conceptual framework, The British Standards Institution, London, UK, September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. W.J. Davies, M.D. Adams, N.S. Bruce, R. Cain, A. Carlyle, D. Cusack, P. Hall, K.I. Hume, A. Irwin, P. Jennings, C.J. Plack, J. Poxon: Perception of soundscapes: An interdisciplinary approach. Health (San Francisco) (2012) 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.05.010. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Cik, M. Lienhart, P. Lercher: Analysis of psychoacoustic and vibration-related parameters to track the reasons for health complaints after the introduction of new tramways. Applied Sciences 6, 12 (2016) 398. http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/6/12/398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Lienhart, M. Cik, M. Fellendorf, K. Fallast, E. Marth, W. Freidl, H. Mayerl: Psychoacoustic indicators of road and rail traffic noise, subjective perception and psychological and physiological parameters, in INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Internoise, Crete, 2018, pp. 466–472. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ö. Axelsson, C. Guastavino, S.R. Payne: Editorial: Soundscape assessment. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02514. [Google Scholar]
  9. Acoustics – Soundscape: Part 2: Data collection and reporting requirements, BSI Standards Publication, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. PD ISO/TS 12913-3:2019: Acoustics – Soundscape, BSI Standards Publication, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Stevens, S. Smith, D. Forest: Soundscape categorisation and the self-assessment manikin, in DAFx 2017 – Proceedings: 20th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, Edinburgh, UK, September 2017, pp. 481–488. [Google Scholar]
  12. M.S. Engel, A. Fiebig, C. Pfaffenbach, J. Fels: A review of the use of psychoacoustic indicators on soundscape studies. Current Pollution Reports 7, 3 (2021) 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-021-00197-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Aletta, J. Kang, Ö. Axelsson: Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models. Landscape and Urban Planning 149 (2016) 65–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Erfanian, A.J. Mitchell, J. Kang, F. Aletta: The psychophysiological implications of soundscape: A systematic review of empirical literature and a research agenda. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, 19 (2019) 3533. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. J.A. Russell: A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 6 (1980) 1161–1178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Dzedzickis, A. Kaklauskas, V. Bucinskas: Human emotion recognition: Review of sensors and methods. Sensors (Switzerland) 20, 3 (2020) 592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Shaffer, R. McCraty, C.L. Zerr: A healthy heart is not a metronome: An integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014) 1–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. W.J. Davies, M.D. Adams, N.S. Bruce, R. Cain, A. Carlyle, P. Cusack, D.A. Hall, K.I. Hume, A. Irwin, P. Jennings, M. Marselle, C.J. Plack, J. Poxon: Perception of soundscapes: An interdisciplinary approach. Applied Acoustics 74, 2 (2013) 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.05.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Harriet, D.T. Murphy: Auralisation of an urban soundscape. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 101, 4 (2015) 798–810. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Guastavino, B.F.G. Katz, J.-D. Polack, D.J. Levitin, D. Dubois: Ecological validity of soundscape reproduction. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 91 (2004) 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  21. W. Davies, M. Adams, N. Bruce, M. Marselle, R. Cain, P. Jennings, J. Poxon, A. Carlyle, P. Cusack, D. Hall, A. Irwin, K. Hume, C. Plack: The positive soundscape project: A synthesis of results from many disciplines, in 38th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering 2009, INTER-NOISE 2009, vol. 1, December 2013, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Stevens: Strategies for environmental sound measurement, modelling and evaluation. PhD thesis, University of York, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Oberman, K. Jambrošić, M. Horvat, B.B.O. Šćitaroci: Using virtual soundwalk approach for assessing sound art soundscape interventions in public spaces. Applied Sciences 10, 6 (2020) 2102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ö. Axelsson, M.E. Nilsson, B. Berglund: A principal components model of soundscape perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 5 (2010) 2836–2846. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3493436. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Osgood, G. Suci, P. Tannenbaum: The measurement of meaning, 1st ed., Urbana, University of Illinois Press, Illinois. 1957. http://yorsearch.york.ac.uk/44YORK:44YORK_ALMA_DS21218486570001381. [Google Scholar]
  26. I. Bakker, T. van der Voordt, P. Vink, J. de Boon: Pleasure, arousal, dominance: Mehrabian and Russell revisited. Current Psychology 33, 3 (2014) 405–421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M.M. Bradley, P.J. Lang: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25, 1 (1994) 49–59. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Stevens, D.T. Murphy, S.L. Smith: Soundscape preference rating using sematic differential pairs and the self-assessment manikin, in Proceedings SMC 2016, Hamburg, Germany, August 2016. [Google Scholar]
  29. M.M. Bradley, P.J. Lang: Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology 37, 2 (2000) 204–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. O. Bones, T.J. Cox, W.J. Davies: Sound categories: Category formation and evidence-based taxonomies. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018) 1277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01277. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. C. Trudeau, C. Guastavino: Classifying soundscapes using a multifaceted taxonomy, in Euronoise 2018, Crete, Greece, May 2018, pp. 2487–2492. Available online: http://www.euronoise2018.eu/docs/papers/411_Euronoise2018.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  32. F. Stevens, D.T. Murphy, S.L. Smith: Soundscape auralisation and visualisation: A cross-modal approach to soundscape evaluation, in DAFx 2018 – Proceedings: 21st International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, Aveiro, Portugal, September 2018, pp. 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Gomez, B. Danuser: Affective and physiological responses to environmental noises and music. International Journal of Psychophysiology 53, 2 (2004) 91–103. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Irwin, D.A. Hall, A. Peters, C.J. Plack: Listening to urban soundscapes: Physiological validity of perceptual dimensions. Psychophysiology 48, 2 (2011) 258–268. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. K. Hume, M. Ahtamad: Physiological responses to and subjective estimates of soundscape elements. Applied Acoustics 74, 2 (2013) 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.10.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. J.J. Alvarsson, S. Wiens, M.E. Nilsson: Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7, 3 (2010) 1036–1046. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/7/3/1036. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. D. Hodges: Music in the human experience: An introduction to music psychology, Taylor & Francis. 2019. Available online: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lx0lEAAAQBAJ. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Laborde, E. Mosley, J.F. Thayer: Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research – Recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis, and data reporting. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017) 1–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Egger, M. Ley, S. Hanke: Emotion recognition from physiological signal analysis: A Review. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 343 (2019) 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2019.04.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. J.F. Thayer, R.D. Lane: A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of Affective Disorders 61, 3 (2000) 201–216. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Porges: Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A polyvagal theory. Psychophysiology 32 (1995) 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. S.W. Porges: The polyvagal perspective. Biological Psychology 74, 2 (2007) 116–143. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. F. Shaffer, J.P. Ginsberg: An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Frontiers in Public Health 5 (2017) 1–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. F. Stevens, D.T. Murphy, S.L. Smith: The self-assessment manikin and heart rate: Responses to auralised soundscapes, in Interactive Audio Systems Symposium, New York, 2016, pp. 1–8. Available online: https://www.york.ac.uk/sadie-project/IASS2016/IASS_Papers/IASS_2016_paper_3.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  45. S. Bech, N. Zacharov: Perceptual Audio Evaluation - Theory, Method and Application, Wiley. 2007. Available online: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1WGPJai1gX8C. [Google Scholar]
  46. M. Green, D. Murphy: EigenScape: A database of spatial acoustic scene recordings. Applied Sciences 7, 11 (2017) 1204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. M. Green, D. Murphy: EigenScape Dataset, Zenodo, October 2017. Available online: https://zenodo.org/record/2628463. [Google Scholar]
  48. E.P. Kasten, S.H. Gage, J. Fox, W. Joo: `The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: An archive for studying soundscape ecology. Ecological Informatics 12 (2012) 50–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. J. Sueur, A. Farina, A. Gasc, N. Pieretti, S. Pavoine: Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 100, 4 (2014) 772–781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. P. Devos: Soundecology indicators applied to urban soundscapes. Inter-noise 2016, 4 (2016) 177–184. [Google Scholar]
  51. M. Green, D. Murphy: Environmental sound monitoring using machine learning on mobile devices. Applied Acoustics 159 (2020) 107041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107041. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. P. Guyot: Acoustic indices github repository, 2019. Available online: https://github.com/patriceguyot/Acoustic_Indices. [Google Scholar]
  53. IEM: IEM Plug-in Suite, 2019. Available online: https://plugins.iem.at/ [Google Scholar]
  54. C. Schörkhuber, M. Zaunschirm, R. Höldrich: Binaural rendering of ambisonic signals via magnitude least squares, in Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA 2018, 2018, pp. 339–342. [Google Scholar]
  55. International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Bureau: ITU-R BS.1770-4, Tech. Rep., Geneva, 2017. Available online: http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en [Google Scholar]
  56. Polar Research and Technology: Polar h10 heart rate sensor system, 2019. Available online: https://www.polar.com/sites/default/files/static/science/white-papers/polar-h10-heart-rate-sensor-white-paper.pdf [Google Scholar]
  57. R. Gilgen-Ammann, T. Schweizer, T. Wyss: RR interval signal quality of a heart rate monitor and an ECG Holter at rest and during exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology 119, 3 (2019) 1525–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04142-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. K. Martinmäki, H. Kinnunen: R-R interval measurement and heart rate variability in polar products, Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland, May 2011, White Paper. [Google Scholar]
  59. J. Happonen: Polar sensor logger, 2019. Available online: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.j_ware.polarsensorlogger [Google Scholar]
  60. M. Vollmer: HRVTool – An open-source matlab toolbox for analyzing heart rate variability, in 2019 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC). Computing in Cardiology, December 2019. https://doi.org/10.22489%2Fcinc.2019.032. [Google Scholar]
  61. M. Vollmer, A robust, simple and reliable measure of heart rate variability using relative RR intervals, in 2015 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), IEEE, 2015, pp. 609–612. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. L. Salahuddin, J. Cho, M.G. Jeong, D. Kim: Ultra short term analysis of heart rate variability for monitoring mental stress in mobile settings. in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007, pp. 4656–4659. [Google Scholar]
  63. M. Malik, A.J. Camm, J.T. Bigger, G. Breithardt, S. Cerutti, R.J. Cohen, P. Coumel, E.L. Fallen, H.L. Kennedy, R.E. Kleiger, F. Lombardi, A. Malliani, A.J. Moss, J.N. Rottman, G. Schmidt, P.J. Schwartz, D.H. Singer: Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. European Heart Journal, 17, 3 (1996) 354–381. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. MATLAB version 9.10.0.1739362 (R2021a) Update 5, The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ipek: Normality test package, MATLAB Central File Exchange, 2021. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/60147-normality-test-package [Google Scholar]
  66. O. Medvedev, D. Shepherd, M.J. Hautus: The restorative potential of soundscapes: A physiological investigation. Applied Acoustics 96 (2015) 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.03.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. D. Ciuk, A.K. Troy, M.C. Jones: Measuring emotion: Self-reports vs. physiological indicators. SSRN Electronic Journal (April 2015) 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  68. J.Y. Hong, B. Lam, Z.T. Ong, K. Ooi, W.S. Gan, J. Kang, J. Feng, S.T. Tan: Quality assessment of acoustic environment reproduction methods for cinematic virtual reality in soundscape applications. Building and Environment 149 (2019) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. J.Y. Jeon, J.Y. Hong, C. Lavandier, J. Lafon, Ö. Axelsson, M. Hurtig: A cross-national comparison in assessment of urban park soundscapes in France, Korea, and Sweden through laboratory experiments. Applied Science 133 (2018) 107–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.12.016. [Google Scholar]
  70. D.S. Quintana, J.A.J. Heathers: Considerations in the assessment of heart rate variability in biobehavioral research. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014) 805. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00805. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. S. Durbridge, D.T. Murphy: Assessment of soundscapes using self-report and physiological measures Dataset. GitHub, January 2023. Available online: https://github.com/sedurCode/ActaAcustica22Resources. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.