EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2023) Acta Acust., 7 (2023) 47 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 7, 2023
Article Number 47
Number of page(s) 12
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2023042
Published online 13 October 2023
  1. M. Krueger, M. Schulte, M.A. Zokoll, K.C. Wagener, M. Meis, T. Brand, I. Holube: Relation between listening effort and speech intelligibility in noise, American Journal of Audiology 26 (Oct 2017) 378–392. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. E.M. Picou, T.A. Ricketts: The relationship between speech recognition, behavioural listening effort, and subjective ratings. International Journal of Audiology 57 (Jan 2018) 457–467. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. International Electrotechnical Commission: IEC 60118-16: electroacoustics – hearing aids – part 16: definition and verification of hearing aid features, 2022. https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/63325. [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Husstedt, J. Kreyenhagen, L. Langhof, S. Kreikemeier, F. Denk, S. Wollermann, M. Frenz: Using the phase inversion method and loudness comparisons for the evaluation of noise reduction algorithms in hearing aids. Acta Acustica 5 (2021) 41. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Schaub: Digital hearing aids, Thieme, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Dillon: Hearing aids, Thieme Publishers Series, Boomerang Press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Metz: Sandlin’s textbook of hearing aid amplification: technical and clinical considerations, Plural Publishing, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Popelka, B. Moore, R. Fay, A. Popper: Hearing aids, in Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Springer International Publishing, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Hayes: Transient impulse control for hearing aids. Hearing Review 13 (2006) 56. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Chalupper, T.A. Powers: New algorithm is designed to take the annoyance out of transient noise. The Hearing Journal 60 (2007) 42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 10843: acoustics – methods for the description and physical measurement of single impulses or series of impulses, 1997. https://www.iso.org/standard/1179.html. [Google Scholar]
  12. A.R. Hernandez, J. Chalupper, T.A. Powers: An assessment of everyday noises and their annoyance. Hearing Review 13 (2006) 16. [Google Scholar]
  13. C.V. Palmer, R. Bentler, H.G. Mueller: Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds. Trends in Amplification 10 (2006) 95–104. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Keidser, E. Convery, J. Kiessling, R. Bentler: Is the hearing instrument to blame when things get really noisy? Hearing Review 16, 8 (2009) 12–19. [Google Scholar]
  15. J.J. DiGiovanni, E.A. Davlin, N.K. Nagaraj: Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users. American Journal of Audiology 20 (2011) 140–150. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Keidser, A. O’Brien, M. Latzel, E. Convery: Evaluation of a noise-reduction algorithm that targets non-speech transient sounds. The Hearing Journal 60 (2007) 29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Liu, H. Zhang, R.A. Bentler, D. Han, L. Zhang: Evaluation of a transient noise reduction strategy for hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (2012) 606–615. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Korhonen, F. Kuk, C. Lau, D. Keenan, J. Schumacher, J. Nielsen: Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech understanding, subjective preference, and preferred gain. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 24 (2013) 845–858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Keshavarzi, T. Reichenbach, B.C.J. Moore: Transient noise reduction using a deep recurrent neural network: effects on subjective speech intelligibility and listening comfort. Trends in Hearing 25 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Takinami: Peak C-weighted sound-pressure level. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (1999) 1138–1138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. International Electrotechnical Commission: IEC 61672-1: 2013 electroacoustics – sound level meters – part 1: specifications, 2013. https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/5708. [Google Scholar]
  22. O. Kirkeby, P.A. Nelson: Digital filter design for inversion problems in sound reproduction. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 47, 7/8 (1999) 583–595. [Google Scholar]
  23. I. Holube, S. Fredelake, M. Vlaming, B. Kollmeier: Development and analysis of an international speech test signal (ISTS). International Journal of Audiology 49, 12 (2010) 891–903. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. International Electrotechnical Commission: IEC 60118-15: electroacoustics – hearing aids – part 15: methods for characterising signal processing in hearing aids with a speech-like signal, 2012. https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/793. [Google Scholar]
  25. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 8253-3: Acoustics – audiometric test methods – part 3: speech audiometry, 2022. https://www.iso.org/standard/74049.html. [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Greenberg, M. Carlos: Psychometric properties and factor structure of a new scale to measure hyperacusis: Introducing the inventory of hyperacusis symptoms. Ear and hearing 39, 5 (2018) 1025–1034. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Signia: Technikbroschüre – expertenwissen für hörgeräteakustiker [technical brochure – expert knowledge for hearing aid professionals]. Tech. Rep, Signia GmbH, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Sjolander, M. Quilter, J. Groth: Hearing aid users show preference for resound impulse noise reduction. Tech. Rep., GN Hearing A/S, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. K. Walsh: Transient noise reduction. Tech. Rep., Starkey Laboratories, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  30. GN Resound: European patent EP 1 471 767 B1 – method and system for acoustik shock protection, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  31. Phonak: EU patent EP 2 027 750 B1 – method and system for acoustic shock detection and application of said method in hearing devices, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  32. Starkey Laboratories: US patent US 2016/0353214 A1 – method and apparatus for suppressing transient sounds in hearing assistance devices, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Keidser, H. Dillon, M. Flax, T. Ching, S. Brewer: The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Audiology Research 1 (2011) 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  34. F. Denk, T. Hieke, M. Roberz, H. Husstedt: Occlusion and coupling effects with different earmold designs – all a matter of opening the ear canal? International Journal of Audiology 62, 3 (2022) 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2022.2039966. [Google Scholar]
  35. Europäische Union der Hörgeräteakustiker e.V. (EUHA): Zusammenfassung EUHA-MPO-Signal und Einstellung der MPO [Summery of EUHA MPO-Signal and setting up the MPO], 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. H. Husstedt: Impulse sounds for the evaluation of impulse or transient noise reduction (Version v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8112384. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.