EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2024) Acta Acust., 8 (2024) 24 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 8, 2024
Article Number 24
Number of page(s) 11
Section Room Acoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2024018
Published online 12 July 2024
  1. R. Beutelmann, T. Brand: Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (2006) 331–342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. A.W. Bronkhorst: The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions. Acta Acustica 86 (2000) 117–128. [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Biberger, S.D. Ewert: The effect of room acoustical parameters on speech reception thresholds and spatial release from masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 146 (2019) 2188–2200. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Viveros, J. Fels: The benefit of head movements of normal listeners in a dynamic speech-in-noise task with virtual acoustics. Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA 2017: 43. Deutsche Jahrestagung fur Akustik: 06.-09. März 2017 in Kiel (2017) 1146–1149. [Google Scholar]
  5. A.W. Bronkhorst, R. Plomp: The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83 (1988) 1508–1516. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. J.A. Grange, J.F. Culling: The benefit of head orientation to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139 (2016) 703–712. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hilfsmittel-Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über die Verordnung von Hilfsmitteln in der vertragsärztlichen Versorgung (2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Rychtarikova, T. Van den Bogaert, G. Vermeir, J. Wouters: Perceptual validation of virtual room acoustics: Sound localisation and speech understanding. Applied Acoustics 72 (2011) 196–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Kokabi, F. Brinkmann, S. Weinzierl: Prediction of speech intelligibility using pseudo-binaural room impulse responses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145 (2019) 329–333. [Google Scholar]
  10. J.F. Culling, M. Levandier: Binaural unmasking and spatial release from masking. Springer International Publishing, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  11. M.L. Hawley, R.Y. Litovsky, J.F. Culling: The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115 (2004) 833–843. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. J.S. Bradley, R.D. Reich, S.G. Norcross: On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (1999) 1820–1828. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Lavendier, J.F. Culling: Speech segregation in rooms: Effects of reverberation on both target and interferer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122 (2007) 1713–1723. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. A.J. Duquesnoy, R. Plomp: Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68 (1980) 537–544. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. F.L. Wightman, D.J. Kistler: Resolution of front–back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (1999) 2841–2853. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. G.C. Stecker, F. Gallun: Binaural hearing, sound localization, and spatial hearing. Plural Publishing, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. ISO 8253–3:2022. Acoustics – Audiometric test methods – Part 3: Speech audiometry, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Hirahara, H. Sagara, I. Toshima, M. Otani: Head movement during head-related transfer function measurements. Acoustical Science and Technology 31 (2010) 165–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Denk, J. Heeren, S.D. Ewert, B. Kollmeier, S.M.A. Ernst: Controlling the head position during individual HRTF measurements and its effect on accuracy. Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA 2017 : 43. Deutsche Jahrestagung fur Akustik: 06.-09. März 2017 in Kiel (2017) 1085–1088. [Google Scholar]
  20. J.G. Richter: Fast measurement of individual head-related transfer functions. RWTH Aachen University, PhD Thesis, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Brinkmann, R. Roden, A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl: Audibility and interpolation of head-above-torso orientation in binaural technology. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 9 (2015) 931–942. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. DIN 45626–1. Tonträger mit Sprache für Gehörprüfung, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Beutelmann, T. Brand, B. Kollmeier: Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127 (2010) 2479–2497. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. ISO 3382-2:2008. Acoustics – Measurement of room acoustic parameters – Part 2: Reverberation time in ordinary rooms, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. F. Jacobsen, J.H. Rindel: Time reversed decay measurements. Journal of Sound and Vibration 117 (1987) 187–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Müller, P. Massarani: Transfer-function measurement with sweeps. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 49 (2001) 394–431. [Google Scholar]
  27. K.-H. Hahlbrock: Speech audiometry and new word-tests. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head Neck 162 (1953) 394–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. International Telecommunication Union. Conventional telephone signal. ITU-T Recommendation G.227, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Winkler, I. Holube: Freiburg monosyllabic speech test and EN ISO 8253–3: Technical analysis. Zeitschrift für Audiologie 55 (2016) 106–113. [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Winkler, I. Holube, H. Husstedt: The Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in noise. HNO 68 (2020) 14–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. C.F. Hauth, S.C. Berning, B. Kollmeier, T. Brand: Modeling binaural unmasking of speech using a blind binaural processing stage. Trends in Hearing 24 (2020) 1–16. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.