EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 7 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 20
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2024087
Published online 28 January 2025
  1. American National Standards Institute: Definitions, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. A.L. Brown: Soundscapes and environmental noise management. Noise Control Engineering Journal 58 (2010) 493–500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. American National Standards Institute: Acoustical Terminology. New York, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Kang, B. Schulte-Fortkamp: Soundscape and the Built Environment. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. J.G. Walker, M.F.K. Chan: Human response to structurally radiated noise due to underground railway operations. Journal of Sound and Vibration 193 (1996) 49–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T.M. Leung, C.K. Chau, S.K. Tang, J.M. Xu: Developing a multivariate model for predicting the noise annoyance responses due to combined water sound and road traffic noise exposure. Applied Acoustics 127 (2017) 284–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B.D. Coensel, S. Vanwetswinkel, D. Botteldooren: Effects of natural sounds on the reaction of road traffic noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129 (2011) 148–153. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Rådsten-Ekman, Ö. Axelsson, M.E. Nilsson: Effects of sounds from water on reaction of acoustic environments dominated by road-traffic noise. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 99 (2013) 218–225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J.Y. Hong, Z. T. Ong, B. Lam, K. Ooi, W. S. Gan, J. Kang, J. Feng, S.-T. Tan: Effects of adding natural sounds to urban noises on the perceived loudness of noise and soundscape quality. Science of the Total Environment 711 (2020) 134571. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. E. Nilsson, J. Alvarsson, M. Rådsten-Ekman, K. Bolin: Auditory masking of wanted and unwanted sounds in a city park. Noise Control Engineering Journal 58 (2010) 524–531. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. E. Nilsson, J. Alvarsson, M. Rådsten-Ekman, K. Bolin: Loudness of fountain and road traffic sounds in a city park, in: 16th International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2009, ICSV, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ö. Axelsson, M. E. Nilsson, B. Hellström, P. Lundén: A field experiment on the impact of sounds from a jet-and-basin fountain on soundscape quality in an urban park. Landscape and Urban Planning 123 (2014) 49–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. M. Taylor: A comparison of models to predict annoyance reactions to noise from mixed sources. Journal of Sound and Vibration 81 (1982) 123–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. B. Ollerhead: Predicting public reaction to noise from mixed sources, in: Proceedings – International Conference on Noise Control Engineering, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Marquis-Favre, L. A. Gille, L. Breton: Combined road traffic, railway and aircraft noise sources: total noise annoyance model appraisal from field data. Applied Acoustics 180 (2021) 108127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Pierrette, C. Marquis-Favre, J. Morel, L. Rioux, M. Vallet, S. Viollon, A. Moch: Noise annoyance from industrial and road traffic combined noises: a survey and a total annoyance model comparison. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32 (2012) 178–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. G. Rice, K. Izumi: Annoyance due to combinations of noises, in: Proceedings – International Acoustic Speech Conference, 1984, pp. 287–294. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Y. Jeon, J. K. Ryu, P. J. Lee: A quantification model of overall dissatisfaction with indoor noise environment in residential buildings. Applied Acoustics 71 (2010) 914–921. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T. L. Nguyen, H. Q. Nguyen, T. Yano, T. Nishimura, T. Sato, T. Morihara, Y. Hashimoto: Comparison of models to predict annoyance from combined noise in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi. Applied Acoustics 73 (2012) 952–959. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Q. Wang, W. Hongwei, W. Xiong, C. Yang: Developing multivariate models for predicting the level of dissatisfaction due to a specific metro noise masked with four specific water sounds. Applied Acoustics 200 (2022) 109082. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Q. Wang, W. Hongwei, Y. Zhang, N. Zou: Evaluating the mitigating effects of water sounds on multi-dimensional negative reactions due to secondary radiation noise. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 8 (2024) 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  22. Q. Wang, W. Hongwei, Y. Zhang, N. Zou, Z. Huang: Metro noise-induced activity disturbances and their water sound-based countermeasures. Noise Control Engineering Journal 72 (2024) 210–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Zahorik: Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (2002) 1832–1846. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Pujol: Le bruit environnemental en milieu urbain: exposition d’une population d’enfants et performances scolaires. Doctoral thesis, University of Franche-Comté, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Q. Tenailleau: Multi-exposition en milieu urbain: approche multi-echelle del’exposition humaine au bruit et à la pollution atmosphérique. Doctoral thesis, University of Franche-Comté, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Dewar: Water features in public places – human responses. Graduate Diploma in Landscape and Architecture thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia, 1990, pp. 104–143. [Google Scholar]
  27. https://www.findsounds.com/ [accessed 22 November 2021]. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Torresin, R. Albatici, F. Aletta, F. Babich, T. Oberman, S. Siboni: Indoor soundscape assessment: a principal components model of acoustic perception in residential buildings. Building and Environment 182 (2020) 107152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. International organization for standardization (ISO): ISO/TS 12913-3:2019, Acoustics Soundscape – Part 3: Data analysis. Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Yang, M. Masullo: Combining binaural psychoacoustic characteristics for emotional evaluations of acoustic environments. Applied Acoustics 210 (2023) 109433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Berglund, T. Lindvall, D. H. Schwela: Guidelines of Community Noise. World Health Organization, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Zhang, J. Kang: Subjective evaluation of urban environment: a case study in Beijing. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 39 (2009) 187–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. K. C. Lam, P. K. Chan, T. C. Chan, W. H. Au, W. C. Hui: Annoyance response to mixed transportation noise in Hong Kong. Applied Acoustics 70 (2009) 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. T. Nowakowski, P. Komorski: Tram noise annoyance: the role of different psychoacoustic measures in the assessment of noise. Applied Acoustics 219 (2024) 109946. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. D. Li, Y. Huang: The discomfort model of the micro commercial vehicles interior noise based on the sound quality analyses. Applied Acoustics 132 (2018) 223–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. H. Ma, T. Yano: An experiment on auditory and non-auditory disturbances caused by railway and road traffic noises in outdoor conditions. Journal of Sound and Vibration 277 (2004) 501–509. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. L. Cantuaria, F. B. Waldorff, L. Wermuth, E. R. Pedersen, A. H. Poulsen, J. D. Thacher, O. Raaschou-Nielsen, M. Ketzel, J. Khan, V. H. Valencia, J. H. Schmidt: Residential exposure to transportation noise in Denmark and incidence of dementia: national cohort study. BMJ-British Medical Journal 374 (2021) n1954. [Google Scholar]
  38. Y. Zhang, D. Ou, Q. Chen, S. X. Kang, G. H. Qu: The effects of indoor plants and traffic noise on English reading comprehension of Chinese university students in home offices. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022) 1003268. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. J. M. Fields, R. G. De Jong, T. Gjestland, I. H. Flindell, R.F.S. Job, S. Kurra, P. Lercher, M. Vallet, T. Yano, R.T.A.R. UNIVERSITY, R. Guski: Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 242 (2001) 641–679. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Kim, S. Lee, S. Kim, H. Song, J. Ryu: Quantitative study on the influence of non-acoustic factors on annoyance due to floor impact noise in apartments. Applied Acoustics 202 (2023) 109144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. H.M.E. Miedema, H. Vos: Noise annoyance from stationary sources: relationships with exposure metric day–evening–night level (DENL) and their confidence intervals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (2004) 334–343. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. G. Q. Di, X. X. Zhou, X. W. Chen: Annoyance response to low frequency noise with tonal components: a case study on transformer noise. Applied Acoustics 91 (2015) 40–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. J. Kaku, T. Kato, S. Kuwano, S. Namba: Predicting overall reaction to multiple noise sources. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (1999) 1005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. J. Morel, C. Marquis-Favre, S. Viollon, M. Alayrac: Proposal for a simple model predicting the total annoyance due to industrial noises with low-frequency content mixed with industrial noises with a 100 Hz main component, in: International Congress on Noise Control Engineering, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  45. T. Ronnebaum, B. Schulte-Fortkamp, R. Weber: Synergetic effects of noise from different sources: a literature study, in: Proceedings of Inter Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, pp. 2241–2246. [Google Scholar]
  46. S. Venturini, M. Plssem Mehmetoglu: A stata package for structural equation modeling with partial least squares. Journal of Statistical Software 88 (2019) 1–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. S. Youssoufi, H. Houot, G. Vuidel, S. Pujol, F. Mauny, J. C. Foltête: Combining visual and noise characteristics of a neighborhood environment to model residential satisfaction: an application using GIS-based metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning 204 (2020) 103932. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. C. Prasad Das, S. Goswami, B. Kumar Swain, M. Das: Association between traffic noise-induced psychophysiological, and socio-demographic factors of motorcycle riders. Applied Acoustics 196 (2022) 108898. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. F. Liu, A. Chang-Richards, K.I.K. Wang, K. N. Dirks: Effects of indoor environment factors on productivity of university workplaces: a structural equation model. Building and Environment 233 (2023) 10098. [Google Scholar]
  50. H. C. Indrani, S.N. N. Ekasiwi, D. Arifianto: Indoor soundscape model: assessing contextual factors in open-plan offices on university campuses in Surabaya, Indonesia. Building and Environment 237 (2023) 110267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. M. H. Beheshti, E. Taban, S. E. Samaei, M. Faridan, F. Khajehnasiri, L. T. Khaveh, M. B. Jebeli, A. Mehri, A. Tajpoor: The influence of personality traits and gender on noise annoyance in laboratory studies. Personality and Individual Differences 148 (2019) 95–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. G. Di, Y. Yao, C. Chen, Q. Lin, Z. Li: An experiment study on the identification of noise sensitive individuals and the influence of noise sensitivity on perceived annoyance. Applied Acoustics 185 (2022) 108394. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. H. Fastl, S. Kuwano, S. Namba: Accessing the railway bonus in laboratory studies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 17 (1996) 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  54. Q. Wang, W. Hongwei, C. Yang, G. Zhang: Developing multivariate models for predicting the levels of multi-dimensional critical reactions due to metro noise inside buildings. Applied Acoustics 200 (2022) 109083. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. J. You, P. J. Lee, J. Y. Jeon: Evaluating water sounds to improve the soundscape of urban areas affected by traffic noise. Noise Control Engineering Journal 58 (2010) 477–483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. S. Dewar: Water features in public places-human responses. Grad. Dip. Landscape and Architecture thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia, Vol. 5, 1990, pp. 104–143. [Google Scholar]
  57. L. A. Gille, C. Marquis-Favre, R. Weber: Aircraft noise annoyance modeling: consideration of noise sensitivity and of different annoying acoustical characteristics. Applied Acoustics 115 (2017) 139–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. M. Wen, H. Ma, C. Wang: Effect of spectral parameters on the elderly’s urgency perception of auditory warning signals. Applied Acoustics 195 (2022) 108850. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. J. Morel, C. Marquis-Favre, L. A. Gille: Noise annoyance assessment of various urban road vehicle pass-by noises in isolation and combined with industrial noise: a laboratory study. Applied Acoustics 101 (2016) 47–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. M. Caniato, F. Bettarello, C. Schmid, P. Fausti: Assessment criterion for indoor noise disturbance in the presence of low frequency sources. Applied Acoustics 113 (2016) 22–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. T. Cheung Chan, K. Che Lam: The effects of information bias and riding frequency on noise annoyance to a new railway extension in Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 13 (2008) 334–339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.