Open Access
Letter to the Editor
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 5, 2021
Article Number 6
Number of page(s) 6
Section General Linear Acoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2020033
Published online 07 January 2021
  1. F. Martini, C.J. Bean, S. Dolan, D. Marsan: Seismic image quality beneath strongly scattering structures and implications for lower crustal imaging: numerical simulations. Geophysical Journal International 145 (2001) 423–435. [Google Scholar]
  2. C.J. Bean, F. Martini: Sub-basalt seismic imaging using optical-to-acoustic model building and wave equation datuming processing. Marine and Petroleum Geology 27 (2010) 555–562. [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Martini, C.J. Bean: Interface scattering versus body scattering in subbasalt imaging and application of prestack wave equation datuming. Geophysics 67, 5 (2002) 1593–1601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. O.P. Singh Satpal, D. Sar, S.M. Chatterjee, S. Sawai: Integrated interpretation for sub-basalt imaging in Saurashtra basin, India. The Leading Edge 25, 7 (2006) 882–885. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Panzner, J.P. Morten, W.W. Weibull, B. Arntsen: Integrated seismic and electromagnetic model building applied to improve subbasalt depth imaging in the faroe-shetland basin. Geophysics 81, 1 (2016) E57–E68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Beckman, A. Spizzichino: The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1963. [Google Scholar]
  7. F.G. Bass, I.M. Fuks: Wave Scattering from Statistically Rough Surfaces. Pergamon Press, Oxford; New York, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  8. J.A. Ogilvy: Theory of Scattering from Random Rough Surfaces, Hilger, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Voronovich: Wave Scattering from Rough Surfaces. Springer, 1994. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Makinde, N. Favretto-Cristini, E. De Bazelaire: Numerical modelling of interface scattering of seismic wavefield from a random rough interface in an acoustic medium: comparison between 2D and 3D cases. Geophysical Prospecting 53, 3 (2005) 373–397. [Google Scholar]
  11. E.G. Loewen, E. Popov: Diffraction Gratings and Applications. CRC Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Palmer: Diffraction Grating Handbook, 8th ed. MKS, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Born, E. Wolf: Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, 7th ed. Cambridge University Press, 1999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J.W. Goodman: Introduction to Fourier optics, 4th ed. Pergamon Press, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Pinson, J. Cordioli, L. Guillon: Spherical wave reflection in layered media with rough interfaces: Three-dimensional modeling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, 2 (2016) 1108–1115. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Tromp, D. Komatitsch, Q. Liu: Spectral-element and adjoint methods in seismology. Communications in Computational Physics 3, 1 (2008) 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  17. Z. Xie, R. Matzen, P. Cristini, D. Komatitsch, R. Martin: A new PML formulation for coupled fuid-solid problems: Application to numerical simulations in ocean acoustics with solid ocean bottoms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140 (2016) 165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Auger, P. Flandrin: Improving the readability of time-frequency and time-scale representations by the reassignment method. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 43, 5 (May 1995) 1068–1089. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Favretto-Cristini, P. Cristini, E. de Bazelaire: What is a seismic reflector like? Geophysics 74, 1 (2009) T13–T23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Favretto-Cristini, P. Cristini, E. de Bazelaire: Influence on the Interface Fresnel zone on the reflected P-wave amplitude modelling. Geophysical Journal International 171 (2007) 841–846. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.