EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2023) Acta Acust., 7 (2023) 43 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 7, 2023
Article Number 43
Number of page(s) 11
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2023038
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. L.M. Arslan, J.H. Hansen: A study of temporal features and frequency characteristics in American English foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102, 1 (1997) 28–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R.E. Baker, M. Baese-Berk, L. Bonnasse-Gahot, M. Kim, K.J. Van Engen, A.R. Bradlow: Word durations in non-native English. Journal of Phonetics 39, 1 (2011) 1–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. K.Y. Chan, M.D. Hall: The importance of vowel formant frequencies and proximity in vowel space to the perception of foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics 77 (2019) 100919. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H.S. Magen: The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics 26, 4 (1998) 381–400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M.J. Munro: Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech 36, 1 (1993) 39–66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. M.J. Munro: Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17 (1995) 17–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G.E. Oh, S. Guion-Anderson, K. Aoyama, J.E. Flege, R. Akahane-Yamada, T. Yamada: A one-year longitudinal study of English and Japanese vowel production by Japanese adults and children in an English-speaking setting. Journal of Phonetics 39, 2 (2011) 156–167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Porretta, A.J. Kyröläinen, B.V. Tucker: Perceived foreign accentedness: Acoustic distances and lexical properties. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77, 7 (2015) 2438–2451. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. A.R. Bradlow, D.B. Pisoni: Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106, 4 (1999) 2074–2085. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Gordon-Salant, G.H. Yeni-Komshian, P.J. Fitzgibbons, J.I. Cohen: Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137, 2 (2015) 884–897. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. M.J. Munro, T.M. Derwing: Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45, 1 (1995) 73–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M.J. Munro, T.M. Derwing: Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech 38, 3 (1995) 289–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. E.O.B. Wilson, T.J. Spaulding: Effects of noise and speech intelligibility on listener comprehension and processing time of Korean-accented English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53, 6 (2010) 1543–1554. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. V. Porretta, B.V. Tucker, J. Järvikivi: The influence of gradient foreign accentedness and listener experience on word recognition. Journal of Phonetics 58 (2016) 1–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M.J. Witteman, A. Weber, J.M. McQueen: Foreign accent strength and listener familiarity with an accent codetermine speed of perceptual adaptation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75, 3 (2013) 537–556. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Markham, V. Hazan: The effect of talker-and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 4 (2004) 725–737. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. V. Porretta, A. Tremblay, P. Bolger: Got experience? PMN amplitudes to foreign-accented speech modulated by listener experience. Journal of Neurolinguistics 44 (2017) 54–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S.K. Sidaras, J.E. Alexander, L.C. Nygaard: Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125, 5 (2009) 3306–3316. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. E.M. Ingvalson, K.L. Lansford, V. Fedorova, G. Fernandez: Cognitive factors as predictors of accented speech perception for younger and older adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 6 (2017) 4652–4659. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. E.M. Ingvalson, K.L. Lansford, V. Federova, G. Fernandez: Listeners’ attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 3 (2017) EL234–EL238. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. C.M. Clarke, M.F. Garrett: Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116, 6 (2004) 3647–3658. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. M.J. Witteman, N.P. Bardhan, A. Weber, J.M. McQueen: Automaticity and stability of adaptation to a foreign-accented speaker. Language and Speech 58, 2 (2015) 168–189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. M.F. Dorman, P.C. Loizou, D. Rainey: Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102, 4 (1997) 2403–2411. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. L.M. Friesen, R.V. Shannon, D. Baskent, X. Wang: Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110, 2 (2001) 1150–1163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. R.V. Shannon, F.G. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski, M. Ekelid: Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270, 5234 (1995) 303–304. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Xu, C.S. Thompson, B.E. Pfingst: Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117, 5 (2005) 3255–3267. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Xu, X. Xi, A. Patton, X. Wang, B. Qi, L. Johnson: A cross-language comparison of sentence recognition using American English and Mandarin Chinese HINT and AzBio sentences. Ear and Hearing 42, 2 (2021) 405–413. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. M.R. Kapolowicz, V. Montazeri, P.F. Assmann: The role of spectral solution in foreign-accented speech perception, in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2016), San Francisco, CA. 2016 3289–3293. [Google Scholar]
  29. M.R. Kapolowicz, V. Montazeri, P.F. Assmann: Perceiving foreign-accented speech with decreased spectral resolution in single- and multiple-talker conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143 (2018) EL99–EL104. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Waddington, B.N. Jaekel, A.R. Tinnemore, S. Gordon-Salant, M.J. Goupell: Recognition of accented speech by cochlear-implant listeners: Benefit of audiovisual cues. Ear and Hearing 41, 5 (2020) 1236–1250. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. A.R. Bradlow, J.A. Alexander: Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121, 4 (2007) 2339–2349. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Fallon, S.E. Trehub, B.A. Schneider: Children’s use of semantic cues in degraded listening environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, 5 (2002) 2242–2249. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. L.H. Mayo, M. Florentine, S. Buus: Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, 3 (1997) 686–693. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. A.A. Zekveld, M. Rudner, I.S. Johnsrude, J. Rönnberg: The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, 3 (2013) 2225–2234. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Y.Y. Kong, G. Donaldson, A. Somarowthu: Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137, 5 (2015) 2846–2857. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. C. Patro, L.L. Mendel: Role of contextual cues on the perception of spectrally reduced interrupted speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, 2 (2016) 1336–1345. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Yang, A. Wagner, Y. Zhang, L. Xu: Recognition of vocoded speech in English by Mandarin-speaking English-learners. Speech Communication 136 (2022) 63–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. R.F. Holt, T. Bent: Children’s use of semantic context in perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60, 1 (2017) 223–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Pinet, P. Iverson, M. Huckvale: Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: Effects of talker–listener accent similarity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130, 3 (2011) 1653–1662. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. D.N. Kalikow, K.N. Stevens, L.L. Elliott: Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the acoustical society of America 61, 5 (1977) 1337–1351. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. M.K. Pichora-Fuller, B.A. Schneider, M. Daneman: How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 1 (1995) 593–608. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. D. Strori, A.R. Bradlow, P.E. Souza: Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147, 6 (2020) 3765–3782. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. D. Strori, A.R. Bradlow, P.E. Souza: Recognising foreign-accented speech of varying intelligibility and linguistic complexity: insights from older listeners with or without hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology 60 (2020) 140–150. [Google Scholar]
  44. R. Holt, C. Kung, K. Demuth: Listener characteristics modulate the semantic processing of native vs. foreign-accented speech. PLoS ONE 13, 12 (2018) e0207452. [Google Scholar]
  45. J. Goslin, H. Duffy, C. Floccia: An ERP investigation of regional and foreign accent processing. Brain and Language 122, 2 (2012) 92–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. L. Gosselin, C.D. Martin, E. Navarra-Barindelli, S. Caffarra: The presence of a foreign accent introduces lexical integration difficulties during late semantic processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36, 9 (2021) 1086–1106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. C. Romero-Rivas, C.D. Martin, A. Costa: Processing changes when listening to foreign-accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9 (2015) 167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. C. Romero-Rivas, C.D. Martin, A. Costa: Foreign-accented speech modulates linguistic anticipatory processes. Neuropsychologia 85 (2016) 245–255. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. C.B. Strauber, L.R. Ali, T. Fujioka, C. Thille, B.D. McCandliss: Replicability of neural responses to speech accent is driven by study design and analytical parameters. Scientific Reports 11, 1 (2021) 1–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. C. Ji, J.J. Galvin, Y.P. Chang, A. Xu, Q.J. Fu: Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 57, 2 (2014) 532–554. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. M.R. Kapolowicz, V. Montazeri, M.M. Baese-Berk, P.F. Assmann: Rapid adaptation to non-native speech is impaired in cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148 (2020) EL267–EL272. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. E.R. O’Neill, M.N. Parke, H.A. Kreft, A.J. Oxenham: Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149, 2 (2021) 1224–1239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. T.N. Tamati, L. Sijp, D. Başkent: Talker variability in word recognition under cochlear implant simulation: Does talker gender matter? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147, 4 (2020) EL370–EL376. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. T.N. Tamati, D.B. Pisoni, A.C.M. Moberly: The perception of regional dialects and foreign accents by cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 64 (2021) 683–690. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. M. Nilsson, S.D. Soli, J.A. Sullivan: Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95, 2 (1994) 1085–1099. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. R.C. Bilger, J.M. Nuetzel, W.M. Rabinowitz, C. Rzeczkowski: Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 27, 1 (1984) 32–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. G. Fairbanks: Voice and Articulation Drillbook. 2nd ed., Harper & Row, NY, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  58. L. Xu, Y. Tsai, B.E. Pfingst: Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: Implications for cochlear prostheses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112, 1 (2002) 247–258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. L. Xu: Temporal envelopes in sine-wave speech recognition, in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2016), San Francisco, CA. 2016: 1682–1686. [Google Scholar]
  60. C.G. Clopper: Effects of dialect variation on the semantic predictability benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes 27, 7–8 (2012) 1002–1020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. S. Gordon-Salant, G.H. Yeni-Komshian, P.J. Fitzgibbons, J.I. Cohen, C. Waldroup: Recognition of accented and unaccented speech in different maskers by younger and older listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, 1 (2013) 618–627. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. A. Gluszek, J.F. Dovidio: Speaking with a nonnative accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29, 2 (2010) 224–234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. A.J. Pantos, A.W. Perkins: Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32, 1 (2013) 3–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. U. Cunningham-Andersson, O. Engstrand: Perceived strength and identity of foreign accent in Swedish. Phonetica 46, 4 (1989) 138–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. U. Gut: Foreign accent. In: C. Müller (Ed.), Speaker classification I, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2007: 75–87. [Google Scholar]
  66. C. Romero-Rivas, C. Morgan, T. Collier: Accentism on trial: categorization/stereotyping and implicit biases predict harsher sentences for foreign-accented defendants. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 41, 2 (2022) 191–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. M.R. Kapolowicz, D.R. Guest, V. Montazeri, M.M. Baese-Berk, P.F. Assmann: Effects of spectral envelope and fundamental frequency shifts on the perception of foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech 65, 2 (2022) 418–443. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.