EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2024) Acta Acust., 8 (2024) 76 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 8, 2024
Article Number 76
Number of page(s) 17
Section Room Acoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2024053
Published online 13 December 2024
  1. E. Öhrström, A. Skånberg, H. Svensson, A. Gildöf-Gunnarsson: Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness. Journal of Sound and Vibration 295 (2006) 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.11.034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Taghipour, T. Sievers, K. Eggenschwiler: Acoustic comfort in virtual inner yards with various building facades. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (2019) 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020249. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Molerón, F. Simon, P. Vincent, O. Richoux: Low frequency acoustic resonances in urban courtyards. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135 (2014) 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4836295. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Hornikx: Ten questions concerning computational urban acoustics. Building and Environment 106 (2016) 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.028. [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Yang, J.Y. Jeon: Design strategies and elements of building envelope for urban acoustic environment. Building and Environment 182 (2020) 107121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Forssén, L. Estévez-Mauriz, A. Gustafson: How can we plan for a good urban sound environment, focusing on road traffic noise? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 588 (2020) 052037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/5/052037. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Balderrama, J. Kang, A. Prieto, A. Luna-Navarro, D. Arztmann, U. Knaack: Effects of facades on urban acoustic environment and soundscape: a systematic review. Sustainability 14, 15 (2022) 9670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Hornikx, J. Forssén: Noise abatement schemes for shielded canyons. Applied Acoustics 70 (2009) 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.04.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Hornikx, J. Forssén: Modelling of sound propagation to three-dimensional urban courtyards using the extended Fourier PSTD method. Applied Acoustics 72 (2011) 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.03.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Badino, R. Manca, L. Shtrepi, C. Calleri, A. Astolfi: Effect of facade shape and acoustic cladding on reduction of leisure noise levels in a street canyon. Building and Environment 157 (2019) 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Calleri, L. Shtrepi, A. Arnmando, A. Astolfi: Evaluation of the influence of building facade design on the acoustic characteristics and auditory perception of urban spaces. Building Acoustics 25 (2018) 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X18757353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Kang: Numerical modelling of the sound fields in urban spaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117 (2005) 3695–3706. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1904483. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Kang: Sound propagation in street canyons: comparison between diffusely and geometrically reflecting boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (2000) 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428580. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Onaga, J.H. Rindel: Acoustic characteristics of urban streets in relation to scattering caused by building facades. Applied Acoustics 68 (2002) 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.01.010. [Google Scholar]
  15. H.H. Eldien: Courtyards forms, an approach to improve the illumination and acoustical environments, IAPS19, Alexandria, 2006. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4359.8882. [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Crippa, E. Dagnini, G. Davies, H. Rees: Facade engineering and soundscape, 2018. Available at https://buro.im/2PYIhL6. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Taghipour, A. Gisladottir, F. Aletta, M. Bürgin, M. Rezaei, U. Sturm: Improved acoustics for semi-enclosed spaces in the proximity of residential buildings, Internoise Glasgow, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3397/IN_2022_0158. [Google Scholar]
  18. M.J. Kim, H.S. Yang, J. Kang: A case study on controlling sound fields in a courtyard by landscape designs. Landscape and Urban Planning 123 (2014) 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H.-S. Yang, J. Kang, M.-J. Kim: An experimental study on the acoustic characteristics of outdoor spaces surrounded by multi-residential buildings. Applied Acoustics 127 (2017) 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.05.037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Balderrama, D. Arztmann, J.-U. Schulz: Review of commercial software tools for facade acoustics. ce/papers 4 (2021) 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.1646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Aoki, M. Koehler, D. Goecke: Der Ruhe den Hof machen/Oases of calm: acoustic design of courtyards. Lärmbekämpfung 16 (2021) 182–188. https://doi.org/10.37544/1863-4672-2021-06-20. [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Goecke, P. Brandstätt, Y. Aoki: Akustikgestaltung von Gebäudefassaden 17 (2022) 83–87. https://doi.org/10.37544/1863-4672-2022-03-25. [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Maag, A. Bosshard, S. Anderson: Developing sound-aware cities: a model for implementing sound quality objectives within urban design and planning processes. Cities & Health 5 (2018) 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2019.1624332. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Maag, K. Tamara, A. Bosshard: Klangqualität für öffentliche Stadt- und Siedlungsräume – Eine Planungshilfe für das Ohr. Baudirektion Kanton Zürich, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  25. U. Sturm, M. Bürgin, A. Schubert: Stadtklang – Wege zu einer hörenswerten Stadt 2. vdf 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Bosshard, K. Eggenschwiler, U. Sturm: Stadtklang – Klangqualität als Gestaltungsziel. Lärmbekämpfung 14 (2019) 80–86. [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Taghipour, S. Athari, A. Gisladottir, T. Sievers, K. Eggenschwiler: Room acoustical parameters as predictors of acoustic comfort in outdoor spaces of housing complexes. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020) 344. (17 pp.) https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00344. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Eggenschwiler, K. Heutschi, A. Taghipour, R. Pieren, A. Gisladottir, B. Schäffer: Urban design of inner courtyards and road traffic noise: influence of facade characteristics and building orientation on perceived noise annoyance. Building and Environment 224 (2022) 109526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Jansohn: Wirkung absorbierender Fassadenflächen und Balkonuntersichten auf die raumakustische Aufenthaltsqualität in Innenhöfen von Wohnbauten. Bachelor-Arbeit, Jade Hochschule Oldenburg, 8. März 2022 (not published). [Google Scholar]
  30. User’s Manual Version 16, Odeon A/S, May 2020, Lyngby. [Google Scholar]
  31. J.H. Rindel: Attenuation of sound reflections due to diffraction. In: Proceedings of NAM-86, Aalborg, Denmark, 1986, pp. 257–260. [Google Scholar]
  32. J.H. Rindel: Acoustic design of reflectors in auditoria. In: Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, vol. 14: Part 2. 1992, pp. 119–128. [Google Scholar]
  33. J.H. Rindel: Modal energy analysis of nearly rectangular rooms at low frequencies. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 101 (2015) 6. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918914. [Google Scholar]
  34. EN ISO 3382–1:2009 Acoustics – Measurement of room acoustic parameters – Part 1: Performance spaces. [Google Scholar]
  35. EN 60268–16:2012 Sound system equipment – Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index. [Google Scholar]
  36. J.S. Bradley, R. Reich, S.G. Norcross: A just noticeable difference in C50 for speech. Applied Acoustic 58 (1999) 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(98)00075-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Dietsch, W. Kraak: Ein objektives Kriterium zur Erfassung von Echostörungen bei Musik- und Sprachdarbietungen. Acustica 60, 3 (1986) 205–216. [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Løvstad: Evaluation of objective echo criteria, Diploma Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), June 2003. [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Frey, H. Fastl, H. Schmoch, E. Mommertz: Psychoakustische und messtechnische Detektion von Echos in Räumen, DAGA 2014 – 40. Jahrestagung für Akustik 10 (März 2014) 13, Oldenburg. [Google Scholar]
  40. W. Fasold, E. Veres: Schallschutz und Raumakustik, Verlag Bauwesen, Berlin, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  41. DIN 18041:2016, Acoustic quality in rooms – Specifications and instructions for the room acoustic design. [Google Scholar]
  42. W. Probst, M. Böhm: The STI-Matrix. Lärmbekämpfung 13 (2018) 2. [Google Scholar]
  43. Expert group of Cercle Bruit Switzerland (Association of Cantonal Noise Abatement Administrators): https://www.cerclebruit.ch/?inc=s_klangraum&lang=de. [Google Scholar]
  44. M. Vorländer: International round robin on room acoustical computer simulations. In: Proceedings 15th ICA 95, Trondheim, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  45. I. Bork: A comparison of room simulation software – the 2nd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 86, 6 (2000) 943–956. [Google Scholar]
  46. I. Bork: Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation – part II: calculations. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 91, 4 (2005) 753–763. [Google Scholar]
  47. ODEON, Reliability tests https://odeon.dk/product/reliability-tests/, download 29.1.2024. [Google Scholar]
  48. C. Lynge Christensen, G. Bælum Nielsen, J. Holger Rindel: Danish Acoustical Society Round Robin on room acoustic computer modelling, 2008. https://odeon.dk/product/reliability-tests/ download 29.1.2024. [Google Scholar]
  49. J.H. Rindel: Roman theatres and revival of their acoustics in the ERATO Project. Acta Acustica/Acustica 99 (2013) 21–29. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. P.J. Lee, J. Kang: Effect of height-to-width ratio on the sound propagation in urban streets. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 101 (2015) 73–87. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918806. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. E. Badino, L. Shtrepi, A. Astolfi, V. Serra: An evaluation of geometrical room acoustics simulations in outdoor settings, 10th convention of the European acoustics association, Forum Acusticum 2023, Torino. https://doi.org/10.61782/fa.2023.0240. [Google Scholar]
  52. J. Heck, C. Dreier, J. Llorca-Bofí, M. Vorländer: Studying outdoor impulse responses at IHTA park: simulated vs. measured, 10th convention of the European acoustics association, Forum Acusticum 2023, Torino. https://doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2023-10091. [Google Scholar]
  53. G. Iannace, E. Ianniello: Measurement and computer simulation of the acoustics of a large courtyard of “Reggia di Caserta”, 1st EAA-EuroRegio 2010 Congress on Sound and Vibration, 2010, Liubljana. [Google Scholar]
  54. C.L. Christensen, G. Koutsouris, J. Rindel: Estimating absorption of materials to match room model against existing room using a genetic algorithm, Forum Acusticum 2014, Krakow. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1588.8647. [Google Scholar]
  55. P. Leistner, A. Kaufmann, M. Koehler, M. Würth, W.K. Hofbauer, S. Dittrich, S. Maier, A. Gordt, M. Jäge: Bauphysik urbaner Oberflächen, Bauphysik 40, 5 (2018) 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/bapi.201800009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. W. Heusler: Urbane Wirkung von Fassaden, Symposiums « Gestaltung urbaner Flächen und Räume», Stuttgart (Germany), Juli 2023, p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  57. K. Horoshenkov, T. Van Renterghem, J. Kang: New approaches to noise reduction, Abstracts of the Second Urban Sound Symposium. Proceedings 72 (2021) 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2021072004. [Google Scholar]
  58. S.-K. Lau, X.-F. Zhu, Z. Lu: Enhancing the acoustic absorption of vegetation with embedded periodic metamaterials. Applied Acoustics 171 (2021)107576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107576. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. L.-T. Chang, F.-C. Chang: Study of Living Wall Systems’ (LWSs) support system for improving LWSs life cycle performance and noise reduction potential. Building and Environment 216 (2022)109007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109007. [Google Scholar]
  60. B. Van Damme, T. Cavalieri, C.T. Nguyen, C. Perrot: Enhancement of the sound absorption of closed-cell mineral foams by perforations: Manufacturing process and model-supported adaptation, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14933 [Google Scholar]
  61. N.G. Yilmaz, P.J. Lee, Y. Soeta, A. Ariki, A. Heimes: Effects of audio-visual interaction on urban courtyard perception, 10th Convention of the European Acoustics Association, Forum Acusticum 2023, Torino. https://doi.org/10.61782/fa.2023.0133. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.