EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 31 References
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Topical Issue - Virtual acoustics
Article Number 31
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025012
Published online 24 April 2025
  1. F. Stärz, L.O.H. Kroczek, S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, S. Van De Par, M. Blau: Comparing room acoustical ratings in an interactive virtual environment to those in the real room, in Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum 2023, Turin, Italy, 11–15 September, European Acoustics Association, 2023, pp. 5010–5016 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Kleiner, B.I. Dalenbäck, P. Svensson: Auralization – an overview. Journal of Audio Engineering Society 41 (1993) 861–875 [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Roßkopf, L.O.H. Kroczek, F. Stärz, M. Blau, S. Van de Par, et al. 2024. The impact of binaural auralizations on sound source localization and social presence in audiovisual virtual reality: converging evidence from placement and eye-tracking paradigms. Acta Acustica, 8, 72. https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2024064 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Lokki, V. Pulkki: Evaluation of the geometry-based parametric auralization, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual, Synthetic and Entertainment Audio, Espoo, Finland, 15–17 June, Audio Engineering Society, pp. 367–376 [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Rindel, C. Christensen: Room acoustic simulation and auralization – how close can we get to the real room? keynote lecture, in Proceedings of the Eighth Western Pacific Acoustics Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 7–9 April, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  6. B.N.J. Postma, B.F.G. Katz: Perceptive and objective evaluation of calibrated room acoustic simulation auralizations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140 (2016) 4326–4337 [Google Scholar]
  7. F.C. Tommasini, O.A. Ramos, M.X. Hüg, S.P. Ferreyra: A computational model to implement binaural synthesis in a hard real-time auditory virtual environment. Acoustics Australia 47 (2019) 51–66 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Lindau, V. Erbes, S. Lepa, H.-J. Maempel, F. Brinkman, S. Weinzierl: A spatial audio quality inventory (SAQI). Acta Acustica united with Acustica 100 (2014) 984–994 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Aspöck, Validation of room acoustic simulation models. PhD Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Brinkmann, L. Aspöck, D. Ackermann, S. Lepa, M. Vorländer, S. Weinzierl: A round robin on room acoustical simulation and auralization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145 (2019) 2746–2760 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Hendrickx, P. Stitt, J.-C. Messonnier, J.-M. Lyzwa, B.F. Katz, C. de Boishéraud: Influence of head tracking on the externalization of speech stimuli for non-individualized binaural synthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (2017) 2011–2023 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Brinkmann, A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl: On the authenticity of individual dynamic binaural synthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142 (2017) 1784–1795 [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl: Assessing the plausibility of virtual acoustic environments. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 98 (2012) 804–810 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S.A. Wirler, N. Meyer-Kahlen, S.J. Schlecht: Towards transfer-plausibility for evaluating mixed reality audio in complex scenes, in AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality (AVAR), Virtual, 17–19 August, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Oberem, B. Masiero, J. Fels: Experiments on authenticity and plausibility of binaural reproduction via headphones employing different recording methods. Applied Acoustics 114 (2016) 71–78 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Lübeck, C. Pörschmann: Evaluating the plausibility of non-individual head-related transfer functions in anechoic conditions, in Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum 2023, Turin, Italy, 11–15 September, European Acoustics Association, 2023, pp. 6205–6211 [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Pike, F. Melchior, T. Tew: Assessing the plausibility of non-individualised dynamic binaural synthesis in a small room, in 55th International AES Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 27–29 August, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Neidhardt, C. Schneiderwind, F. Klein: Perceptual matching of room acoustics for auditory augmented reality in small rooms – literature review and theoretical framework. Trends in Hearing 26, 23312165221092919 [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Stärz, L.O.H. Kroczek, S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, S. Van De Par, M. Blau: Perceptual comparison between the real and the auralized room when being presented with congruent visual stimuli via a head-mounted display. in Proceedings of the 24th International Congress on Acoustics (ICA), Gyeongju, Korea, 24–28 October, 2022 [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Blau, A. Budnik, M. Fallahi, H. Steffens, S.D. Ewert, S. Van De Par: Toward realistic binaural auralizations – perceptual comparison between measurement and simulation-based auralizations and the real room for a classroom scenario. Acta Acustica 5 (2021) 8 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Brandenburg, S. Werner, F. Klein, C. Sladeczek: Auditory illusion through headphones: history, challenges and new solutions. Proceedings of the Meetings on Acoustics, 28 (2016) 050010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Slater, S. Wilbur: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6 (1997) 603–616 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Roßkopf, L.O.H. Kroczek, F. Stärz, M. Blau, S. Van De Par, A. Mühlberger: The effect of audio-visual room divergence on the localization of real sound sources in virtual reality, in Fortschritte der Akustik (DAGA), Hamburg, 6–9 March, 2023 [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Satongar, C. Pike, Y.W. Lam, A.I. Tew: The influence of headphones on the localization of external loudspeaker sources. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 63 (2015) 799–810 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Schneiderwind, A. Neidhardt, D. Meyer: Comparing the effect of different open headphone models on the perception of a real sound source, in 150th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Online, 25–28 May [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Lladó, T. McKenzie, N. Meyer-Kahlen, S. Schlecht: Predicting perceptual transparency of head-worn devices. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 70 (2022) 585–600 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. F. Stärz, S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, L. Kroczek, S. Par, M. Blau: Acoustically transparent headphones as an add-on for a head-mounted display, in Fortschritte der Akustik (DAGA), Hannover, 18–21 March, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Denk, F. Brinkmann, A. Stirnemann, B. Kollmeier: The PIRATE: an anthropometric earPlug with exchangeable microphones for individual reliable acquisition of transfer functions at the ear canal entrance, in Fortschritte der Akustik (DAGA), Rostock, Germany, 18–21 March, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Wendt, S. Van de Par, S.D. Ewert: A computationally-efficient and perceptually-plausible algorithm for binaural room impulse response simulation. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 62 (2014) 748–766 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Steffens, S. Van de Par, S. Ewert: Perceptual relevance of speaker directivity modelling in virtual rooms, in Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics, Aachen, Germany, 9– 13 September, Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Akustik, 2019, pp. 2651–2658 [Google Scholar]
  31. J.B. Allen, D.A. Berkley: Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65 (1979) 943–950 [Google Scholar]
  32. J-M. Jot, A. Chaigne, “Digital delay networks for designing artificial reverberators,” in Proc. 90th AES Convention, Paris, France, Feb. 1991 [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Majdak, P. Balazs, B. Laback: Multiple exponential sweep method for fast measurement of head-related transfer functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 55 (2007) 623–637 [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Novák, L. Simon, F. Kadlec, P. Lotton: Nonlinear system identification using exponential swept-sine signal. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 59 (2010) 2220–2229 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. F. Brinkmann, S. Weinzierl: AKtools – an open software toolbox for signal acquisition, processing, and inspection in acoustics, in AES 142nd Convention, Berlin, Germany, 20–23 May (Engineering Brief 309, 2017 May). Available at http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=18685 [Google Scholar]
  36. V.R. Algazi, C. Avendano, R.O. Duda: Estimation of a spherical-head model from anthropometry. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49 (2002) 472–479 [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Majdak, Y. Iwaya, T. Carpentier, R. Nicol, M. Parmentier, A. Roginska, Y. Suzuki, K. Watanabe, H. Wierstorf, H. Ziegelwanger, M. Noisternig: Spatially oriented format for acoustics: a data exchange format representing head-related transfer functions, in AES 134th Convention, Rome, Italy, 4–7 May [Google Scholar]
  38. E. Sengpiel: Gleichungen für die pegeldifferenz- und laufzeitdifferenz-lokalisationskurve [Online]. Available at https://sengpielaudio.com/GleichungenDLundDt.pdf [Google Scholar]
  39. F. Klein, S. Werner, T. Mayenfels: Influences of training on externalization of binaural synthesis in situations of room divergence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65 (2017) 178–187 [Google Scholar]
  40. O. Kirkeby, P. Nelson: Digital filter design for inversion problems in sound reproduction. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 47 (1999) 583–595 [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Paquier, V. Koehl: Audibility of headphone positioning variability, in 128th Audio Engineering Society Convention, Londres, United Kingdom, 22–25 May, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  42. H. Jäger, J. Bitzer, U. Simmer, M. Blau: Echtzeitfähiges binaurales rendering mit bewegungssensoren von 3d-brillen, in Fortschritte der Akustik (DAGA), Kiel, Germany, 6–9 March, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  43. H. Jäger, U. Simmer, J. Bitzer, M. Blau: Time-variant overlap-add in partitions [Online]. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00319 [Google Scholar]
  44. N. Meyer-Kahlen, M. Kastemaa, S. J. Schlecht, T. Lokki: Measuring motion-to-sound latency in virtual acoustic rendering systems. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 71 (2023) 390–398 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. D.S. Brungart, A.J. Kordik, B.D. Simpson: Effects of headtracker latency in virtual audio displays. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 54 (2006) 32–44 [Google Scholar]
  46. S. Weinzierl, S. Lepa, D. Ackermann: A measuring instrument for the auditory perception of rooms: the room acoustical quality inventory (RAQI). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144 (2018) 1245–1257 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. D. Leckschat, C. Epe, Aufnahmen von Sprecherinnen und Sprechern zur Verwendung in der Virtuellen Akustik, (Feb. 20, 2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3601086 [Google Scholar]
  48. EBU: EBU r 128 loudness normalisation and permitted maximum level of audio signals [Online]. Available at https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/r/r128_2011_DE.pdf [Google Scholar]
  49. MathWorks: Audio toolbox user's guide. The MathWorks, Inc. 2024, https://de.mathworks.com/help/pdf_doc/audio/audio_ug.pdf [Google Scholar]
  50. P. Chevret, E. Parizet: An efficient alternative to the paired comparison method for the subjective evaluation of a large set of sounds. in 19th International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid, Spain, 2–7 September, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  51. R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2024. Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  52. W. Revelle: psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research, version 2.4.3. Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2024, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych [Google Scholar]
  53. M.A. Lawrence: ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments, version 4.4-0. Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2016, http://github.com/mike-lawrence/ez [Google Scholar]
  54. S.S. Shapiro, M.B. Wilk: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52 (1965) 591–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. J.P. Royston: An extension of shapiro and wilk's w test for normality to large samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 31 (1982) 115–124 [Google Scholar]
  56. S. Holm: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (1979) 65–70 [Google Scholar]
  57. R.V. Hogg, J. Ledolter: Engineering statistics. Macmillan, 1987 [Google Scholar]
  58. M. Hollander, D.A. Wolfe, E. Chicken: Nonparametric statistical methods. John Wiley & Sons, 2015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. J.D. Gibbons, S. Chakraborti: Nonparametric statistical inference, in M. Lovric (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 977–979 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. N. Meyer-Kahlen: Transfer-plausible acoustics for augmented reality. Doctoral thesis, Aalto University, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  61. K. Genuit: Ein modell zur beschreibung von aussenohrübertragungseigenschaften (A model for describing transfer-functions of the outer ear). Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 1984 [Google Scholar]
  62. K. Genuit, A. Fiebig: Do we need new artificial heads? in 19th International Congress on Acoustics 2007 (ICA 2007), Madrid, Spain, 2–7 September, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  63. A. Ahrens, K.D. Lund, M. Marschall, T. Dau: Sound source localization with varying amount of visual information in virtual reality. PLoS One 14 (2019) e0214603 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. S. Fichna, T. Biberger, B.U. Seeber, S.D. Ewert: Effect of acoustic scene complexity and visual scene representation on auditory perception in virtual audio-visual environments, in Immersive and 3D Audio: from Architecture to Automotive (I3DA), Bologna, Italy, 8–10 September, IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–9 [Google Scholar]
  65. F. Stärz, S. Van de Par, S. Roßkopf, L. Kroczek, A. Mühlberger, M. Blau: Supplementary material – Blind comparison of binaural auralisations to a real loudspeaker in an audiovisual virtual classroom scenario: Effect of room acoustic simulation, HRTF dataset and head worn devices on rated room-acoustical attributes. 2024, https://zenodo.org/records/12543044, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12543044 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.