Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 80
Number of page(s) 15
Section Aeroacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025064
Published online 09 January 2026
  1. I. Smith: The effect of dissociation in rockets, ramjets, and wind tunnels, in: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Conference Proceedings. Vol. 178. SAGE Publications, Sage UK, London, England, 1963, pp. 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Fry: A century of ramjet propulsion technology evolution. Journal of Propulsion Power 20 (2004) 27–58. [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Falempin: Ramjet and dual mode operation, Technical Report RTP-EN-AVT-150, NATO, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Wang, Q. Yang, X. Xu: Effect of thermal choking on ejection process in a rocket-based combined cycle engine. Applied Thermal Engineering 116 (2017) 197–204. [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Knuth, P. Gloyer, J. Goodman, R. Litchfor: Thermally-choked combustor technology, Technical 19960009786, NASA, 1993, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19960009786. [Google Scholar]
  6. O. Dessornes, D. Scherrer: Tests of the JAPHAR dual-mode ramjet engine. Aerospace Science and Technology 9 (2005) 211–221. [Google Scholar]
  7. K.-C. Lin, K. Jackson, R. Behdadnia, T. Jackson, F. Ma, V. Yang: Acoustic characterization of an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor with a cavity flameholder. Journal of Propulsion Power 26 (2010) 1161–1170. [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Marble, S. Candel: Acoustic disturbance from gas non-uniformities convected through a nozzle. Journal of Sound and Vibration 55 (1977) 225–243. [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Moase, M. Brear, C. Manzie: The forced response of choked nozzles and supersonic diffusers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 585 (2007) 281–304. [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Duran, S. Moreau: Solution of the quasi-one-dimensional linearized Euler equations using flow invariants and the Magnus expansion. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 723 (2013) 190–231. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Magri: On indirect noise in multicomponent nozzle flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 828 (2017) R2. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Huet, A. Emmanuelli, T. Le Garrec: Entropy noise modelling in 2D choked nozzle flows. Journal of Sound and Vibration 488 (2020) 115637. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Gentil, G. Daviller, S. Moreau: Combustion noise modelling of thermally perfect and multi-species gas flow in nozzles. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1014 (2025) A39. [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Olivon, A. Genot, J.-E. Durand, A. Hirschberg, E. Piot: On the linear aero-acoustic response of a thermally-choked-flow nozzle to acoustic and entropy plane waves. Submitted to Journal of Sound and Vibration (2025). [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Olivon, A. Genot, L. Hirschberg, S. Moreau, A. Hirschberg: On the critical-throat boundary condition in quasi-one-dimensional linearised-Euler equation models. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1019 (2025) A4. [Google Scholar]
  16. H.S. Tsien: The transfer functions of rocket nozzles. Journal of the American Rocket Society 22 (1952) 139–143. [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Karimi, M. Brear, W. Moase: Acoustic and disturbance energy analysis of a flow with heat communication. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 597 (2008) 67–89. [Google Scholar]
  18. S.R. Yeddula, R. Gaudron, A.S. Morgans: Acoustic absorption and generation in ducts of smoothly varying area sustaining a mean flow and a mean temperature gradient. Journal of Sound and Vibration 515 (2021) 116437. [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Karimi, M.J. Brear, W.H. Moase: On the interaction of sound with steady heat communicating flows. Journal of Sound and Vibration 329 (2010) 4705–4718. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Giauque, M. Huet, F. Clero: Analytical analysis of indirect combustion noise in subcritical nozzles. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 134 (2012) 111202. [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Nan, J. Li, A. Morgans, L. Qin, L. Yang: Theoretical analysis of sound propagation and entropy generation across a distributed steady heat source. Journal of Sound and Vibration 536 (2022) 117170. [Google Scholar]
  22. V. Rani, S. Rani: WKB solutions to the quasi 1D acoustic wave equation in ducts with non-uniform cross-section and inhomogeneous mean flow properties – acoustic field and combustion instability. Journal of Sound and Vibration 436 (2018) 183–219. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Basu, S.L. Rani: Generalized acoustic Helmholtz equation and its boundary conditions in a quasi 1-D duct with arbitrary mean properties and mean flow. Journal of Sound and Vibration 512 (2021) 116377. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Yeddula, J. Guzmán-Iñigo, A. Morgans: A solution for the quasi-one-dimensional linearised Euler equations with heat transfer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 936 (2022) R3. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Jain, L. Magri: A physical model for indirect noise in non-isentropic nozzles: transfer functions and stability. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 935 (2022) A33. [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Olivon, J.-E. Durand, A. Genot, E. Piot: Unsteady forced motion of the thermal throat in a low-Mach dual-mode ramjet nozzle, in: EUCASS-3AF, 2023, p. 558. [Google Scholar]
  27. E. Bekaert, A. Genot, T. Le Pichon, T. Schuller: Longitudinal acoustic field in a two-phase ramjet: numerical simulation and acoustic models, in: 3rd International Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science & Technology, 2024, p. 151. https://hal.science/hal-04616255. [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Olivon, J.-E. Durand, A. Genot, E. Piot: High-frequency acoustic propagation in a thermally choked low-Mach dual-mode ramjet, in: 30th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (2024). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024, pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  29. J.-E. Durand, F. Olivon: Thermally choked nozzle flow 1D model for low-Mach dual mode scramjet performance assessment, in: 3rd International Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science & Technology, 2024, p. 130. https://hal.science/hal-04948424/. [Google Scholar]
  30. W. Li, D. Zhao, X. Chen, Y. Sun, S. Ni, D. Guan, B. Wang: Numerical investigations on solid-fueled ramjet inlet thermodynamic properties effects on generating self-sustained combustion instability. Aerospace Science and Technology 119 (2021) 107097. [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Yeddula, J. Guzman Inigo, A. Morgans: Effect of steady and fluctuating heat transfer on acoustic and entropy transfer functions of a nozzle, in: 28th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics (2022) Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022, pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  32. Y. Gentil, G. Daviller, S. Moreau, N. Treleaven, T. Poinsot: Theoretical analysis and numerical validation of the mechanisms controlling composition noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration 585 (2024) 118463. [Google Scholar]
  33. E.W. Lemmon, R.T. Jacobsen, S.G. Penoncello, D.G. Friend: Thermodynamic properties of air and mixtures of nitrogen, argon, and oxygen from 60 to 2000 K at pressures to 2000 MPa. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 29 (2000) 331–385. [Google Scholar]
  34. E. Süli, D.F. Mayers: An Introduction to Numerical Analysis, 1 edn. Cambridge University Press, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  35. A.H. Shapiro: The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow. Wiley, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  36. W. Heiser, D. Pratt: Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion. AIAA, Washington, DC, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Refloch, B. Courbet, A. Murrone, P. Villedieu, C. Laurent, P. Gilbank, J. Troyes, L. Tessé, G. Chaineray, J. Dargaud, E. Quémerais, F. Vuillot: CEDRE software. AerospaceLab Journal (2011). https://hal.science/hal-01182463. [Google Scholar]
  38. C. Le Touze, A. Murrone, H. Guillard: Multislope MUSCL method for general unstructured meshes. Journal of Computational Physics 284 (2015) 389–418. [Google Scholar]
  39. E. Toro, M. Spruce, W. Speares: Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver. Shock Waves 4 (1994) 25–34. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Butcher: Implicit Runge–Kutta processes. Mathematics of Computation 18 (1964) 50–64. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.