EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 6 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 6
Number of page(s) 20
Section Aeroacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026005
Published online 13 February 2026
  1. M.J.T. Smith: Aircraft Noise. Cambridge University Press, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  2. A.W. Guess: Calculation of perforated plate liner parameters from specified acoustic resistance and reactance. Journal of Sound and Vibration 40 (1975) 119–137. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Kooi, S. Sarin: An experimental study of the acoustic impedance of Helmholtz resonator arrays under a turbulent boundary layer, in: 7th Aeroacoustics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1981, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Murray, R.J. Astley: Development of a single degree of freedom perforate impedance model under grazing flow and high SPL, in: 18th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (33rd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 2012, p. 2294. [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Dean, An in situ method of wall acoustic impedance measurement in flow ducts. Journal of Sound and Vibration 34 (1974) 97–IN6. [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Watson, M. Jones, T. Parrott: Validation of an impedance eduction method in flow. AIAA Journal 37 (1999) 818–824. [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Jing, S. Peng, X. Sun: A straightforward method for wall impedance eduction in a flow duct. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (2008) 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Elnady, H. Bodén, B. Elhadidi: Validation of an inverse semi-analytical technique to educe liner impedance. AIAA Journal 47 (2009) 2836–2844. [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Ferrante, W. De Roeck, W. Desmet, N. Magnino: Back-to-back comparison of impedance measurement techniques applied to the characterization of aero-engine nacelle acoustic liners. Applied Acoustics 105 (2016) 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  10. L.A. Bonomo, N.T. Quintino, A.M.N. Spillere, P.B. Murray, J.A. Cordioli: A comparison of in situ and impedance eduction experimental techniques for acoustic liners with grazing flow and high sound pressure level. International Journal of Aeroacoustics 23 (2024) 60–83. [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Bodén, L. Zhou, J.A. Cordioli, A.A. Medeiros, A.M. Spillere: On the effect of flow direction on impedance eduction results, in: 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2016, p. 2727. [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Renou, Y. Aurégan: Failure of the Ingard–Myers boundary condition for a lined duct: an experimental investigation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130 (2011) 52. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Aurégan: On the use of a stress–impedance model to describe sound propagation in a lined duct with grazing flow. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143 (2018) 2975–2979. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Weng, A. Schulz, D. Ronneberger, L. Enghardt, F. Bake: Flow and viscous effects on impedance eduction. AIAA Journal 56 (2018) 1118–1132. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Khamis, E.J. Brambley: Acoustics in a two-deck viscothermal boundary layer over an impedance surface. AIAA Journal 55 (2017) 3328–3345. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Primus, E. Piot, F. Simon, M.G. Jones, W. Watson: ONERA-NASA cooperative effort on liner impedance eduction, in: 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2013, p. 2273. [Google Scholar]
  17. X. Jing, S. Peng, L. Wang, X. Sun: Investigation of straightforward impedance eduction in the presence of shear flow. Journal of Sound and Vibration 335 (2015) 89–104. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Yang, T. Humbert, J. Golliard, G. Gabard: Shear flow effects in a 2D duct: influence on wave propagation and direct impedance eduction. Journal of Sound and Vibration 576 (2024) 118296. [Google Scholar]
  19. D.C. Pridmore-Brown: Sound propagation in a fluid flowing through an attenuating duct. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 4 (1958) 393–406. [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Brooks, A. McAlpine: Sound transmission in ducts with sheared mean flow, in: 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (28th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007, p. 3545. [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Roncen, E. Piot, F. Méry, F. Simon, M.G. Jones, D.M. Nark: Wavenumber-based impedance eduction with a shear grazing flow. AIAA Journal 58 (2020) 3040–3050. [Google Scholar]
  22. A.H. Nayfeh, J.E. Kaiser, B.S. Shaker: Effect of mean-velocity profile shapes on sound transmission through two-dimensional ducts. Journal of Sound and Vibration 34 (1974) 413–423. [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Gabard: A comparison of impedance boundary conditions for flow acoustics. Journal of Sound and Vibration 332 (2013) 714–724. [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Weng, L. Enghardt, F. Bake: Comparison of non-modal-based and modal-based impedance eduction techniques, in: 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, p. 3773. [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Boyer, E. Piot, J.-P. Brazier: Theoretical investigation of hydrodynamic surface mode in a lined duct with sheared flow and comparison with experiment. Journal of Sound and Vibration 330 (2011) 1793–1809. [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Boyd: Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, 2nd edition. Dover, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  27. U. Ingard: Influence of fluid motion past a plane boundary on sound reflection, absorption, and transmission. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 31 (1959) 1035–1036. [Google Scholar]
  28. M.K. Myers: On the acoustic boundary condition in the presence of flow. Journal of Sound and Vibration 71 (1980) 429–434. [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Rienstra, G. Vilenski: Spatial instability of boundary layer along impedance wall, in: 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2008, p. 2932. [Google Scholar]
  30. E.R. van Driest: On turbulent flow near a wall. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences 23 (1956) 1007–1011. [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Rashidi, J. Golliard, T. Humbert: 3D Multimodal inverse method for liner impedance eduction. Journal of Sound and Vibration 605 (2025) 118954. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022460X25000288. [Google Scholar]
  32. E.J. Brambley: Surface modes in sheared boundary layers over impedance linings. Journal of Sound and Vibration 332 (2013) 3750–3767. [Google Scholar]
  33. E.J. Brambley: Fundamental problems with the model of uniform flow over acoustic linings. Journal of Sound and Vibration 322 (2009) 1026–1037. [Google Scholar]
  34. A.N. Carr: Acoustic mode decomposition in rectangular ducts with sheared flow, in: 30th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2024, p. 3368. [Google Scholar]
  35. T. Humbert, J. Golliard, E. Portier, G. Gabard, Y. Auregan: Multimodal characterisation of acoustic liners using the maine flow facility, in: 28th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2022, p. 3082. [Google Scholar]
  36. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 3966:2008: Measurement of Fluid Flow in Closed Conduits – Velocity Area Method Using Pitot Static Tubes, Genebra, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  37. L.A. Bonomo, A.M. Spillere, J.A. Cordioli: Parametric uncertainty analysis for impedance eduction based on Prony’s method. AIAA Journal 58 (2020) 3625–3638. [Google Scholar]
  38. K. Levenberg: A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 2 (1944) 164–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. D.W. Marquardt: An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 11 (1963) 431–441. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. W.S. Don, A. Solomonoff: Accuracy enhancement for higher derivatives using Chebyshev collocation and a mapping technique. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 18 (1997) 1040–1055. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.