EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 22 References
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Topical Issue - Modern approaches to Active Control of Sound and Vibration
Article Number 22
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026018
Published online 03 April 2026
  1. D. Moreau, B. Cazzolato, A. Zander, C. Petersen: A review of virtual sensing algorithms for active noise control. Algorithms 1 (2008) 69–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Pawelczyk: Adaptive noise control algorithms for active headrest system. Control Engineering Practice 12 (2004) 1101–1112. [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Jung, S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer: Estimation of the pressure at a listener’s ears in an active headrest system using the remote microphone technique. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143 (2018) 2858–2869. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Kappis, J.A. Zhang, J. Cheer: Remote microphone virtual sensing with nested microphone sub-arrays. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 158 (2025) 407–418. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Zhang, S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer: Robust performance of virtual sensing methods for active noise control. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 152 (2021) 107453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Zhang, S. Wang, H. Duan, J. Tao, H. Zou, X. Qiu: A study on coherence between virtual signal and physical signals in remote acoustic sensing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 152 (1) (2022) 2840–2848. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Elliott, J. Garcia-Bonito: Active cancellation of pressure and pressure gradient in a diffuse sound field. Journal of Sound and Vibration 186 (1995) 696–704. [Google Scholar]
  8. D.J. Moreau, J. Ghan, B.S. Cazzolato, A.C. Zander: Active noise control in a pure tone diffuse sound field using virtual sensing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125 (2009) 3742–3755. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Li, S. Wang, J. Tao, X. Qiu: Enhancing the coherence between virtual and physical signals in virtual sensing with a double-layer microphone arrangement. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157 (2025) 2392–2403. [Google Scholar]
  10. B.S. Cazzolato, J. Ghan: Frequency domain expressions for the estimation of time-averaged acoustic energy density. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117 (2005) 3750–3756. [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Jung, S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer: Local active control of road noise inside a vehicle. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 121 (2019) 144–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Krause, A. Singh, C. Guestrin: Near-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes: theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9 (2008) 235–284. [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Ariga, T. Nishida, S. Koyama, N. Ueno, H. Saruwatari: Mutual-information-based sensor placement for spatial sound field recording, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain, May, 2020, pp. 166–170. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Ueno, S. Koyama, H. Saruwatari: Kernel ridge regression with constraint of the Helmholtz equation for sound field interpolation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC), Tokyo, 2018, pp. 1–440. [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Chardon, W. Kreuzer, M. Noisternig: Design of spatial microphone arrays for sound field interpolation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 9, 5 (2015) 780–790. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Barrault, Y. Maday, N.C. Nguyen, A.T. Patera: An ‘empirical interpolation’ method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 339, 9 (2004) 667–672. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Koyama, G. Chardon, L. Daudet: Joint source and sensor placement for sound field control based on empirical interpolation method, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP) Calgary, AB, 2018, pp. 501–505. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Koyama, G. Chardon, L. Daudet: Optimizing source and sensor placement for sound field control: an overview. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 28 (2020) 696–714. [Google Scholar]
  19. S.A. Verburg, F. Elvander, T. Van Waterschoot, E. Fernandez-Grande: Optimal sensor placement for the spatial reconstruction of sound fields. EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing 2024 (2024) 41. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Katoch, S.S. Chauhan, V. Kumar: A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80 (2021) 8091–8126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Neri, C. Cotta, P. Moscato, J. Kacprzyk, Eds.: Handbook of Memetic Algorithms. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Vol. 379. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  22. D.C. Zimmerman: A Darwinian approach to the actuator number and placement problem with non-negligible actuator mass. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 7 (1993) 363–374. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Katsikas: A genetic algorithm for active noise control actuator positioning. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 9 (1995) 697–705. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Wrona, M. Pawelczyk: Shaping frequency response of a vibrating plate for passive and active control applications by simultaneous optimization of arrangement of additional masses and ribs. Part II: optimization. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 70–71 (2016) 699–713. [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Wrona, M. Pawelczyk, J. Cheer: Acoustic radiation-based optimization of the placement of actuators for active control of noise transmitted through plates. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 147 (2021) 107009. [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Wrona, M. De Diego, M. Pawelczyk: Shaping zones of quiet in a large enclosure generated by an active noise control system. Control Engineering Practice 80 (2018) 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  27. X. Zheng, Z. Jia, B. Wan, M. Zeng, Y. Qiu: A study on hybrid active noise control system combined with remote microphone technique. Applied Acoustics 205 (2023) 109296. [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Deb: Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms: an introduction. Technical Report 2011003, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Kappis, J. Cheer: Topology optimisation of microphone arrays for remote microphone virtual sensing in diffuse sound fields, in: Proceedings of the 11th Convention of the European Acoustics Association, Forum Acusticum/EuroNoise 2025, Málaga, Spain, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Zadeh: Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 8 (1963) 59–60. [Google Scholar]
  31. S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer: Modeling local active sound control with remote sensors in spatially random pressure fields. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137 (2015) 1936–1946. [Google Scholar]
  32. S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer, J.-W. Choi, Y. Kim: Robustness and regularization of personal audio systems. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 20 (2012) 2123–2133. [Google Scholar]
  33. W. Jung, S.J. Elliott, J. Cheer: Combining the remote microphone technique with head-tracking for local active sound control. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142 (2017) 298–307. [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. Censor: Pareto optimality in multiobjective problems. Applied Mathematics & Optimization 4 (1977) 41–59. [Google Scholar]
  35. MathWorks: gamultiobj MATLAB Help Center, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  36. K. Deb: An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 186 (2000) 311–338. [Google Scholar]
  37. B.L. Miller, D.E. Goldberg: Genetic algorithms, tournament selection, and the effects of noise. Complex Systems 9 (1995) 193–212. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  38. G. Pavai, T.V. Geetha: A survey on crossover operators. ACM Computing Surveys 49 (2017) 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  39. K. Deb: Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Systems 9 (1995) 115–148. [Google Scholar]
  40. K. Deb, D. Deb: Analyzing mutation schemes for real-parameter genetic algorithms. Technical Report 2012016, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. [Google Scholar]
  41. C.-L. Hwang, K. Yoon: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Vol. 186. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  42. N. Vafaei, R.A. Ribeiro, L.M. Camarinha-Matos: Normalization techniques for multi-criteria decision making: analytical hierarchy process case study, in: L.M. Camarinha-Matos et al., Eds. Technological Innovation for Cyber-Physical Systems. Vol. 470. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016, pp. 261–269. [Google Scholar]
  43. R.T. Marler, J.S. Arora: The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 41, 6 (2010) 853–862. [Google Scholar]
  44. A. González: Measurement of areas on a sphere using Fibonacci and latitude-longitude lattices. Mathematical Geosciences 42 (2010) 49–64. [Google Scholar]
  45. F. Zotter, S. Riedel, L. Gölles, M. Frank: Diffuse sound field synthesis: ideal source layers. Acta Acustica 8 (2024) 34. [Google Scholar]
  46. J.M. Munn, B.S. Cazzolato, C.H. Hansen, C.D. Kestell: Higher-order virtual sensing for remote active noise control, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  47. F. Jacobsen: The diffuse sound field - statistical considerations concerning the reverberant field in the steady state. Technical Report 27, Technical University of Denmark, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  48. C.D. Kestell, B.S. Cazzolato, C.H. Hansen: Active noise control in a free field with virtual sensors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109 (2001) 232–243. [Google Scholar]
  49. Y.C. Park, S.D. Sommerfeldt: Global attenuation of broadband noise fields using energy density control. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 1 (1997) 350–359. [Google Scholar]
  50. J.W. Parkins, S.D. Sommerfeldt, J. Tichy: Narrowband and broadband active control in an enclosure using the acoustic energy density. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108, 1 (2000) 192–203. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.