EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 71 References
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Topical Issue - Proceedings of AFPAC 2026
Article Number 71
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026069
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. L. Le Jeune, S. Robert, P. Dumas, A. Membre, C. Prada: Adaptive ultrasonic imaging with the total focusing method for inspection of complex components immersed in water, in: AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1650. American Institute of Physics, 2015, pp. 1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4914712. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Camacho, C. Fritsch: Adaptive Beamforming by Phase Coherence Processing. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Camacho, M. Parrilla, C. Fritsch: Phase coherence imaging. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 56, 5 (2009) 958–974. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Baiotto, B. Knight-Gregson, C. Nageswaran, T. Clarke: Coherence weighting applied to FMC/TFM data from austenitic CRA clad lined pipes. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 37, 3 (2018) 49. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Cruza, J. Camacho, C. Fritsch: Plane-wave phase-coherence imaging for NDE. NDT & E International 87 (2017) 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  6. J.R. Tempelman, A.J. Wachtor, E.B. Flynn: Machine learning-based ultrasonic weld characterization using hierarchical wave modeling and diffusion-driven distribution alignment, 2025. ArXiv preprint arXiv:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2026.118899. [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Singh, K. Tant, A. Mulholland, C. MacLeod: Deep learning based inversion of locally anisotropic weld properties from ultrasonic array data. Applied Sciences 12, 2 (2022) 532. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Zhou, Z. Han, D. Du: An improved ultrasonic imaging method for austenitic welds based on grain orientation distribution inversion algorithm. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 39, 3 (2020) 54. [Google Scholar]
  9. Q. Liu, H. Wirdelius: Estimation of grain orientation in an anisotropic weld by using a model of ultrasonic propagation in an inverse scheme. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering 2014, 1 (2014) 637476. [Google Scholar]
  10. M.K. Kalkowski, M.J. Lowe, V. Samaitis, F. Schreyer, S. Robert: Weld map tomography for determining local grain orientations from ultrasound. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 479, 2277 (2023) 20230236. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Ludlam, K.M. Tant, A. Curtis, V. Dolean: Ultrasonic travel-time tomography for approximating the local elastic tensor in complex media, in: 2025 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IUS62464.2025.11201431. [Google Scholar]
  12. K.M. Tant, E. Galetti, A. Mulholland, A. Curtis, A. Gachagan: Effective grain orientation mapping of complex and locally anisotropic media for improved imaging in ultrasonic non-destructive testing. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering 28, 12 (2020) 1694–1718. [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Ménard, S. Robert, R. Miorelli, D. Lesselier: Optimization algorithms for ultrasonic array imaging in homogeneous anisotropic steel components with unknown properties. NDT & E International 116 (2020) 102327. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Menard, S. Robert, D. Lesselier: Ultrasonic array imaging of nuclear austenitic V-shape welds with inhomogeneous and unknown anisotropic properties. Applied Sciences 11, 14 (2021) 6505. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Arnoud, F. Guvenen, T. Kleineberg: Benchmarking global optimizers. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26340. [Google Scholar]
  16. I.C. Trelea: The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection. Information Processing Letters 85, 6 (2003) 317–325. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Mahaut, M. Darmon, S. Chatillon, F. Jenson, P. Calmon: Recent advances and current trends of ultrasonic modelling in CIVA. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring 51, 2 (2009) 78–81. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Darmon, N. Leymarie, S. Chatillon, S. Mahaut: Modelling of scattering of ultrasounds by flaws for NDT, in: A. Leger, M. Deschamps, Eds. Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in non Homogeneous Media. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 61–71. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Ogilvy: Computerized ultrasonic ray tracing in austenitic steel. NDT International 18, 2 (1985) 67–77. [Google Scholar]
  20. K.M.M. Tant, E. Galetti, A.J. Mulholland, A. Curtis, A. Gachagan: Effective grain orientation mapping of complex and locally anisotropic media for improved imaging in ultrasonic non-destructive testing. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering 28, 12 (2020) 1694–1718. [Google Scholar]
  21. J.A. Sethian: Fast marching methods. SIAM Review 41, 2 (1999) 199–235. [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Leymarie, A. Imperiale, T. Fortuna, E. Demaldent: Comparisons of ray and finite element simulations of ultrasonic wave fields in smoothly inhomogeneous austenitic welds of thick-walled components. NDT & E International 147 (2024) 103177. [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Cerveny: Seismic Ray Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  24. I.M. Sobol’, D. Asotsky, A. Kreinin, S. Kucherenko: Construction and comparison of high-dimensional Sobol’generators. Wilmott 2011, 56 (2011) 64–79. [Google Scholar]
  25. P.-S. Liao, T.-S. Chen, P.-C. Chung, et al.: A fast algorithm for multilevel thresholding. Journal of Information Science and Engineering 17, 5 (2001) 713–727. [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Renardy, L.R. Joslyn, J.A. Millar, D.E. Kirschner: To Sobol or not to Sobol? The effects of sampling schemes in systems biology applications. Mathematical Biosciences 337 (2021) 108593. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.