EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 4 / No 6 (2020) Acta Acust., 4 6 (2020) 24 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 4, Number 6, 2020
Article Number 24
Number of page(s) 10
Section Environmental Noise
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2020023
Published online 11 November 2020
  1. A. Christian, R. Cabell: Initial investigation into the psychoacoustic properties of small unmanned aerial system noise. Proceedings of the 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (AVIATION 2017), Denver, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. A.J. Torija, Z. Li, R.H. Self: Effects of a hovering unmanned aerial vehicle on urbansoundscapes perception. Transportation Research Part D 78 (2020) 102195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Jeon, J. Shin, Y. Lee, W. Kim, Y. Kwon, H. Yang, Proceedings of European Signal Processing Conference 1858–1862 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Sinibaldi, L. Marino: Experimental analysis on the noise of propellers for small UAV. Applied Acoustics 74 (2013) 79–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Christian, D.D. Boyd, N.S. Zawodny, S.A. Rizzi: Auralization of tonal rotor noise components of a quadcopter flyover. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2015, San Francisco, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. N.S. Zawodny, N.A. Pettingill. Acoustic Wind Tunnel Measurements of a Quadcopter in Hover and Forward Flight Conditions. Proceedings of inter-noise 2018, Chicago, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Pechan, A. Sescu: Experimental study of noise emitted by propeller’s surface imperfections. Applied Acoustics 92 (2015) 12–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Herreman: Proposed Measurement Method for UAV Sound Levels. Proceedings of NOISE-CON (2016) 615–622. [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Cheng, D.W. Herrin, Noise level prediction of a small UAV using panel contribution analysis, Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2018, Chicago, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Kloet, S. Watkins, R. Clothier: Acoustic signature measurement of small multi-rotor unmanned aircraft systems. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles 9 (2017) 3–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Treichel, S. Körper: Investigation of the noise emission of drones (in German). Zeitschrift für Lärmbekämpfung 14 (2019) 108–114. [Google Scholar]
  12. U. Zölzer: DAFX – Digital Audio Effects. John Wiley & Sons, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Rocchesso: Fractionally addressed delay lines. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 8 (2000) 717–727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. E.E. Delany, E.N. Bazley: Acoustical properties of fibrous absorbent materials. Applied Acoustics 3 (1970) 105–116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C.I. Chessel: Propagation of noise along a finite impedance boundary, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62 (1977) 825–834. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. ISO Standard 9613–1: Acoustics – attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 1: Calculation of the absorption of sound by the atmosphere. [Google Scholar]
  17. G.A. Daigle, J.E. Piercy, T.F.W. Embleton: Line-of-sight propagation through atmospheric turbulence near the ground. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74 (1983) 1505–1513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Heutschi, R. Pieren, M. Müller, M. Manyoky, U. Wissen Hayek, K. Eggenschwiler: Auralization of wind turbine noise: Propagation filtering and vegetation noise synthesis. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 100 (2014) 13–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Oeckel, J. Heimann, M. Kerscher, S. Angermann, G. Heilmann, W. Rüther-Kindel: Comparative acoustic examination of UAV Propellers. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2018, Chicago, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Pieren, K. Heutschi, M. Müller, M. Manyoky, K. Eggenschwiler: Auralization of wind turbine noise: emission synthesis. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 100 (2014) 25–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Intaratep, W.N. Alexander, W.J. Devenport, S.M. Grace, A. Dropkin, Experimental Study of Quadcopter Acoustics and Performance at Static Thrust Conditions. 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Lyon, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.