EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 6 (2022) Acta Acust., 6 (2022) 15 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 6, 2022
Article Number 15
Number of page(s) 14
Section Environmental Noise
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2022014
Published online 25 April 2022
  1. B. Derudder, P.J. Taylor, M. Hoyler, P. Ni, X. Liu, M. Zhao, W. Shen, F. Witlox: Measurement and interpretation of connectivity of Chinese cities in world city network. Chinese Geographical Science 23, 2013 (2010) 261–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Chen, C. Claramunt, C. Ray: A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network, Journal of Transport Geography 36 (2014) 12–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J.G. Walker, M.F.K. Chan: Human response to structurally radiated noise due to underground railway operations. Journal of Sound and Vibration 193 (1996) 49–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Lechner, D. Schnaiter, S. O’Bose-Reilly: Application of the noise annoyance equivalents model for aircraft, rail and road traffic noise to self-reported sleep disturbance. Acta Acustica 5 (2021) 12. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Griefahn, A. Marks, C. Kuenemund, M. Basner: Awakenings by road-, rail- and air-traffic noise, in Forum Acusticum, Budapest. 2005, pp. 159–164. [Google Scholar]
  6. H.M.E. Miedema: Annoyance caused by environmental noise: Elements for evidence-based noise policies, Journal of Social Issues 63 (2007) 41–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Seidler, M. Wagner, M. Schubert, P. Dröge, K. Römer, J. Pons-Kühnemann, E. Swart, H. Zeeb, J. Hegewald: Aircraft, road and railway traffic noise as risk factors for heart failure and hypertensive heart disease – A case-control study based on secondary data, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 219 (2016) 749–758. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Foraster, N. Künzli, I. Aguilera, M. Rivera, D. Agis, J. Vila, L. Bouso, A. Deltell, J. Marrugat, R. Ramos, J. Sunyer, R. Elosua, X. Basagaña: High blood pressure and long-term exposure to indoor noise and air pollution from road traffic. Environmental Health Perspectives 122 (2014) 1193. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Minichilli, F. Gorini, E. Ascari, F. Bianchi, A. Coi, L. Fredianelli, G. Licitra, F. Manzoli, L. Mezzasalma, L. Cori: Annoyance judgment and measurements of environmental noise: A focus on Italian secondary schools. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15 (2018) 208. [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Lercher: Environmental noise and health: An integrated research perspective. Environment International 22 (1996) 117–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Dratva, E. Zemp, D.F. Dietrich, P.O. Bridevaux, T. Rochat, C. Schindler, M.W. Gerbase: Impact of road traffic noise annoyance on health-related quality of life: Results from a population-based study. Quality of Life Research 19 (2010) 37–46. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. X. Li, Z. Hu, C. Zou: Noise annoyance and vibration perception assessment on passengers during train operation in Guangzhou Metro. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (2022) 4246–4259. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. N.N. Liu, Y.S. Wang, L. Shi: Annoyance evaluation of subway interior noise based on psychoacoustical indices. Noise & Vibration Worldwide 44 (2013) 18–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. N.N. Liu, Y.S. Wang, J.U. Jian: Fuzzy comprehensive method for subjective noise annoyance evaluation of subway’s interior noise. Noise and Vibration Control 34 (2014) 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Hou, Q. Zeng, L. Fei, J. Li: Noise evaluation method for urban rail transit underground station platforms. Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University 61 (2021) 57–63. [Google Scholar]
  16. H.Y. Ji, D.H. Koo, J.C. Kim: Experimental verification of differences in subjective annoyance responses using a jury test to compare the noise emissions of straight and curved sections of an urban railway. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 230 (2016) 1146–1147. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Viollon, C. Lavandier: Influence of vision on audition in an urban context. InterNoise 61 (1997) 1341–1344. [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Bangjun, S. Lili, D. Guoqing: The influence of the visibility of the source on the subjective annoyance due to its noise. Applied Acoustics 64 (2003) 1205–1215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Nathanail: Urban environmental noise in Greece: A social survey, in Forum Acusticum, Budapest. 2005, pp. 1853–1858 [Google Scholar]
  20. I. van Kamp, R.F.S. Job, J. Hatfield, M. Haines, R.K. Stellato, S.A. Stansfeld: The role of noise sensitivity in the noise–response relation: A comparison of three international airport studies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (2004) 3471–3479. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Jiao, J. Kang, M. Zhang: Evaluation of acoustic characteristics of Chinese open-plan office environment. Acta Acustica 35 (2010) 179–184. [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Maiberger, U. Letens, R. Weber, S. Van De Par: Individual influences on the evaluation of vehicle sounds: A typology of premium car drivers with regard to their attitude towards cars and sounds. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 104 (2018) 509–520. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. K.C. Lam, A.L. Brown, L. Marafa, K.C. Chau: Human preference for countryside soundscapes. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 96 (2010) 463–471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Belojevic, V. Slepcevic, B. Jakovljevic: Mental performance in noise: The role of introversion. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (2001) 209–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Belojevic, B. Jakovljevic, V. Slepcevic: Noise and mental performance: Personality attributes and noise sensitivity. Noise Health 6 (2003) 77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. S.H. Park, P.J. Lee: Reaction to floor impact noise in multi-storey residential buildings: The effects of acoustic and non-acoustic factors. Applied Acoustics 150 (2019) 268–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. G. Di, X. Liu, Q. Lin, Y. Zheng, L. He: The relationship between urban combined traffic noise and annoyance: An investigation in Dalian, north of China. Science of the Total Environment 432 (2012) 189–194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. R.S.F., Job, J. Hatfield, N.L. Carter, P. Peploe, R. Taylor, S. Morrell: Interrelationships between reaction to noise, noise sensitivity, prior knowledge of noise, and residential satisfaction, in 17th ICA, Rome. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Cheung Chan, K. Che Lam: The effects of information bias and riding frequency on noise annoyance to a new railway extension in Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 13 (2008) 334–339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Vogt, M. Kastner: The role of information policy in annoyance generation and reduction, in Inter-Noise, 27–30 August, Nice, France. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Solberg: Giving people control of their noise problem - Techniques to prevent annoyance, in Forum Acusticum Budapest 2005 4th Eur. Congr. Acustics. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  32. T. De Muer, D. Botteldooren, K. Boeynaems: Influence of activity pattern on noise exposure and effects of noise, in Euronoise, Finland. 2006, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  33. B. Espinoza-Varas, H. Jang: Backward-masked frequency discrimination by young and older adults: Effects of masker level variability. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 92 (2006) 457–467. [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Yamada: Hearing of low frequency sound and influence on the body, in Conference on Low Frequency Noise and Hearing, Denmark. 1980, pp. 95–102. [Google Scholar]
  35. D.S. Michaud, S.E. Keith, D. McMurchy: Noise annoyance in Canada. Noise Health 7 (2005) 39–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. D. Ouis: Annoyance from road traffic noise: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (2001) 101–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Z. Pan, Y. Huang, J. Jin, B. Zhang, W. Hu, W. Ji: Subjective response to environmental noise in park and annoying threshold. Acta Acustica 18 (1993) 463–471. [Google Scholar]
  38. M.E. Nilsson, B. Berglund: Soundscape quality in suburban green areas and city parks. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 92 (2006) 903–911. [Google Scholar]
  39. X. Qin, J. Kang, H. Jin: Sound environment of waiting areas in large general hospitals in China. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 98 (2012) 760–767. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. H. Ma, X. Ji, T. Yano: Analysis of community response to noise in Chinese city. Acta Acustica 33 (2008) 275–282. [Google Scholar]
  41. M.S. Khan: Evaluation of acoustical comfort in passenger trains. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 88 (2002) 270–277. [Google Scholar]
  42. B. Jakovljevic, K. Paunovic, G. Belojevic: Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population. Environment International 35 (2009) 552–556. [Google Scholar]
  43. European Commission: European commission position paper on EU noise indicators. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  44. D. Zheng, X. Cai, T. Chen, N. Seiichino, H. Takeo, K. Sonoko: Study about noise terms. Acta Acustica 18 (1993) 444–454. [Google Scholar]
  45. S.A. Stansfeld, B. Berglund, C. Clark, I. Lopez-Barrio, P. Fischer, E. Öhrström, M.M. Haines, J. Head, S. Hygge, I. Van Kamp, B.F. Berry: Aircraft and road traffic noise and children’s cognition and health: A cross-national study. The Lancet 365 (2005) 1942–1949. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. R. Guski, U. Felscher-Suhr, R. Schuemer: The concept of noise annoyance: How international experts see it. Journal of Sound and Vibration 223 (1999) 513–527. [Google Scholar]
  47. B. Berglund, T. Lindvall, D.H. Schwela: Guidelines of Community Noise. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  48. R.F.S. Job, J. Hatfield, N.L. Carter, P. Peploe, R. Taylor, S. Morrell: General scales of community reaction to noise (dissatisfaction and perceived affectedness) are more reliable than scales of annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110 (2001) 939–946. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. F.L. Hall, S.M. Taylor: Reliability of social survey data on noise effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72 (1982) 1212–1221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. A.J. Hede, R.B. Bullen, J.A. Rose: A social study of the nature of subjective reaction to aircraft noise. National Acoustics Laboratories Report No. 79, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  51. J.M. Fields: Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 (1993) 2753–2763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. J.M. Fields, R.G. De Jong, T. Gjestland, I.H. Flindell, R.F.S. Job, S. Kurra, P. Lercher, M. Vallet, T. Yano, R. Guski, U. Felscher-Suhr, R. Schumer: Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and a recommendation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 242 (2001) 641–679. [Google Scholar]
  53. J.M. Fields, R. de Jong, A.L. Brown, I.H. Flindell, T. Gjestland, R.F.S. Job, S. Kurra, P. Lercher, A. Schuemer-Kohrs, M. Vallet, T. Yano: Guidelines for reporting core information from community noise reaction surveys. Journal of Sound and Vibration 206 (1997) 685–695. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. T.M. Leung, C.K. Chau, S.K. Tang, J.M. Xu: Developing a multivariate model for predicting the noise annoyance responses due to combined water sound and road traffic noise exposure. Applied Acoustics 127 (2017) 284–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. J.Y. Jeon, J.K. Ryu, P.J. Lee: A quantification model of overall dissatisfaction with indoor noise environment in residential buildings. Applied Acoustics 71 (2010) 914–921. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. E. Burke, S. Uppenkamp, C. Koch: A psychoacoustical study to investigate the perceived unpleasantness of infrasound combined with audio-frequency sound. Acta Acustica 4 (2020) 20. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  57. S.M.K. Moghadam, I. Alimohammadi, E. Taheri, J. Rahimi, F. Bostanpira, N. Rahmani, K.D. Abedi, H. Ebrahimi: Modeling effect of five big personality traits on noise sensitivity and annoyance. Applied Acoustics 172 (2021) 107655. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. K.C. Lam, P.K. Chan, T.C. Chan, W.H. Au, W.C. Hui: Annoyance response to mixed transportation noise in Hong Kong. Applied Acoustics 70 (2009) 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. I. Bouzid, A. Derbel, B. Elleuch: Factors responsible for road traffic noise annoyance in the city of Sfax, Tunisia. Applied Acoustics 168 (2020) 107412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. I. Alimohammadi, P. Nassiri, M. Azkhosh, M. Hoseini: Factors affecting road traffic noise annoyance among white-collar employees working in Tehran, Iran. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering 7 (2010) 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  61. C.K. Chau, T.M. Leung, J.M. Xu, S.K. Tang: Modelling noise annoyance responses to combined sound sources and views of sea, road traffic, and mountain greenery. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144 (2018) 3503–3513. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. J. Ki, S. Yun, W. Kim, S. Oh, J. Ha, E. Hwangbo, H. Lee, S. Shin, S. Yoon, H. Youn: Local residents’ attitudes about wind farms and associated noise annoyance in South Korea. Energy Policy 163 (2022) 112847. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. ISO 1996-1: Acoustics – Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise – Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures. International Organization for Standardization, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  64. S. Pujol: Le bruit environnemental en milieu urbain: Exposition d’une population d’enfants et performances scolaires. Doctoral thesis, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  65. Q. Tenailleau: Multi-exposition en milieu urbain: approche multi-echelle del’exposition humaine au bruit et à la pollution atmosphérique. Doctoral thesis, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  66. P. Zahorik: Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (2002) 1832–1846. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. P. Maigrot, É. Parizet, C. Marquis-Favre: Annoyance due to combined railway noise and vibration: Comparison and testing of results from the literature. Applied Acoustics 165 (2020) 107324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. S.C. Lee, J.Y. Hong, J.Y. Jeon: Effects of acoustic characteristics of combined construction noise on annoyance. Building and Environment 92 (2015) 657–667. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. DIN 45631/A1: Calculation of Loudness Level and Loudness from the Sound Spectrum e Zwicker Method e Amendment 1: Calculation of the Loudness of Time-variant Sound. Deutsche Industrie Normen, Beuth Verlag, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  70. W. Aures: Berechnungsverfahren für den sensorischen Wohlklang beliebiger Schallsignale. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 59 (1985) 130–141. [Google Scholar]
  71. H. Fastl, E. Zwicker: Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. H. Li, W. Peng, Y. Xiang, Z. Wenjun: Researches on Sound Environment in Futian Underground Railway Station. Procedia Engineering 165 (2016) 730–739. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. J. Liang, J. Xie, Y.H. Gao, Q. Sun: Vehicle interior sound quality preference evaluation model based on correlation analysis. Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban)/Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition) 39 (2009) 274–278. [Google Scholar]
  74. B. De Coensel, D. Botteldooren, B. Berglund, M.E. Nilsson, T. De Muer, P. Lercher: Experimental investigation of noise annoyance caused by high-speed trains. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 93 (2007) 589–601. [Google Scholar]
  75. X. Zhang, M. Ba, J. Kang, Q. Meng: Effect of soundscape dimensions on acoustic comfort in urban open public spaces. Applied Acoustics 133 (2018) 73–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.