Open Access
Scientific Article
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 6, 2022
Article Number 14
Number of page(s) 12
Section Underwater Sound
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2022010
Published online 13 April 2022
  1. O. Sund: Echo sounding in fishery research. Nature 135, 3423 (1935) 953. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. C.S. Clay, H. Medwin: Acoustical Oceanography: Principles and Applications, John Wiley & Sons. 1977. [Google Scholar]
  3. ICES: Report of the Planning Group on Aerial and Acoustic Surveys for Mackerel, 5-7 April 2005, ICES CM 2005/G:13: Bergen, Norway. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Gorska, R.J. Korneliussen, E. Ona: Acoustic backscatter by schools of adult Atlantic mackerel. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64 (2007) 1145–1151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. K.G. Foote, D.N. MacLennan: Comparison of copper and tungsten carbide calibration spheres. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75, 2 (1984) 612–616. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D.A. Demer, L. Berger, M. Bernasconi, E. Bethke, K. Boswell, D. Chu, R. Domokos, et al.: Calibration of acoustic instruments. ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 326. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Bodholt: The effect of water temperature and salinity on echo sounder measurements, in ICES Symposium on Acoustics in Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Montpellier, June, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Simmonds, D.N. MacLennan: Fisheries Acoustics. Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., Blackwell Science Ltd. 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M.F. Hamilton, D.T. Blackstock (Eds.): Nonlinear Acoustics, Academic Press. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  10. F.E. Tichy, H. Solli, H. Klaveness: Nonlinear effects in a 200-kHz sound beam and consequences for target strength measurement. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60 (2003) 571–574. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A.C. Baker, P. Lunde: Nonlinear effects in sound propagation from echo-sounders used in fish abundance estimation. Numerical simulation results. CMR Tech. Note CMR-TN02-A10008-Rev-01, Bergen, Norway: Christian Michelsen Research AS. 2002. De-classified revision of CMR Tech. Note CMR-TN02-F10008, 2002 (confidential). [Google Scholar]
  12. A.C. Baker, P. Lunde: Nonlinear propagation from circular echo-sounder transducers. Numerical simulation results. CMR Tech. Note CMR-TN01-A10010-Rev-01, Bergen, Norway: Christian Michelsen Research AS. 2011. De-classified revision of CMR Tech. Note CMR-TN01-F10010, 2001 (confidential).. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Pedersen: Effects of nonlinear sound propagation in fisheries research. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bergen, 2006 [Online]. https://hdl.handle.net/1956/2158. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Pedersen, M. Vestrheim, P. Lunde: Non-linear sound propagation effects in fisheries research echo sounders - Measurements and simulations in fresh water, in Proc. 28th Scandinavian Symposium on Physical Acoustics, Ustaoset, Norway, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Khodabandeloo, E. Ona, G.J. Macaulay, R. Korneliussen: Nonlinear crosstalk in broadband multi-channel echosounders. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149, 1 (2021) 87–101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kongsberg Maritime: Non-linear effects. Recommendation for fishery research investigations. [Online]. https://www.kongsberg.com/no/maritime/products/commercial-fisheries/ekkoloddsvingere/non-linear-effects/. [Accessed 30 November 2021], 2002. [Google Scholar]
  17. R.J. Korneliussen, N. Diner, E. Ona, L. Berger, P.G. Fernandes: Proposals for the collection of multifrequency acoustic data. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65, 6 (2008) 982–994. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Lunde, A.O. Pedersen, R.J. Korneliussen, F.E. Tichy, H. Nes: Power-budget and echo-integrator equations for fish abundance estimation. Fisken og havet 10 (2013) https://www.hi.no/hi/nettrapporter/fisken-og-havet/2013/fh_10-2013_echo_integrator. [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Lunde, R.J. Korneliussen: A unifying theory explaining different power budget formulations used in modern scientific echosounders for fish abundance estimation. Fisken og havet 7 (2014). https://www.hi.no/hi/nettrapporter/fisken-og-havet/2014/lunde_korneliussen_fh_07-2014_2015-02-14_mergeddocument. [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Lunde, R.J. Korneliussen: Power-budget equations and calibration factors for fish abundance estimation using scientific echo sounder and sonar systems. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 4 (2016) 43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Lunde: Finite-amplitude power budget equations for acoustic fish abundance estimation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 8 (2020) 98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Simrad AS: Operator Manual: SIMRAD EK500 Fishery research echo sounder. Scientific echo sounder: Base version. Doc. no. P2170/Rev. G, Horten. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  23. L.E. Kinsler, A.R. Frey, A.B. Coppens, J.V. Sanders: Fundamentals of Acoustics. 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Lunde, A.O. Pedersen: Sonar and power budget equations for backscattering of finite amplitude sound waves, with implications in fishery acoustics for abundance estimation of marine resources, in 35th Scand. Symp. Phys. Acoust., Geilo, Norway, Jan 29-Feb 1, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. E.A. Zabolotskaya, R.V. Khokhlov: Quasi-plane waves in the nonlinear acoustics of confined beams. Soviet Physics Acoustics 15, 1 (1969) 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  26. V.P. Kuznetsov: Equations of nonlinear acoustics. Soviet Physics Acoustics 16, 4 (1971) 467–470. [Google Scholar]
  27. R.E. Francois, G.R. Garrison: Sound absorption based on ocean measurements. Part I: Pure water and magnesium sulfate contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72, 3 (1982) 896–907. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. R.E. Francois, G.R. Garrison: Sound absorption based on ocean measurements. Part II: Boric acid contribution and equation for total absorption. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72, 6 (1982) 1879–1890. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Berntsen, J.N. Tjøtta, S. Tjøtta: Interaction of sound waves. Part IV: Scattering of sound by sound. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86, 5 (1989) 1968–1983. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. R.J. Korneliussen: Measurement and removal of echo integration noise. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57 (2000) 1204–1217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. R.J. Korneliussen: The Bergen Echo Integrator post-processing system, with focus on recent improvements. Fisheries Research 68 (2004) 159–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. R.J. Korneliussen, Y. Heggelund, G.J. Macaulay, D. Patel, E. Johnsen, I.K. Eliassen: Acoustic identification of marine species using a feature library. Methods in Oceanography 17 (2016) 187–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. D.N. MacLennan, P.G. Fernandes, J. Dalen: A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59 (2002) 365–369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. R.J. Korneliussen, E. Ona: An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59 (2002) 293–313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. C.-T. Chen, F.J. Millero: Speed of sound in seawater at high pressures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62, 5 (1977) 1129–1135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. F.D. Cotaras, C.L. Morfey: Polynomial expressions for the coefficient of nonlinearity β and β/(ρc5)1⁄2 for fresh water and seawater, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94, 1 (1993) 585–588. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. N.P. Fofonoff, R.C. Millard Jr: Algorithms for computation of fundamental properties of seawater. UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science 44 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  38. A.O. Pedersen, P. Lunde, F.E. Tichy, R.J. Korneliussen: Finite amplitude sound propagation effects in volume backscattering measurements for fish abundance estimation (3.0) [Data set]. Zenodo, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6059530. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.