Open Access
Acta Acust.
Volume 8, 2024
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 18
Section Environmental Noise
Published online 04 January 2024
  1. A.R. George, R. Seebass: Sonic boom minimization including both front and rear shocks. AIAA Journal 9, 10 (1971) 2091–2093. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L.B. Jones: Lower bounds for sonic bangs. Aeronautical Journal 65, 606 (1961) 433–436. [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Seebass, A.R. George: Sonic-boom minimization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51, 2C (1972) 686–694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G.B. Whitham: The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 5, 3 (1952) 301–348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S.S. Stevens: Perceived level of noise by Mark VII and decibels (E). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51, 2B (1972) 575–601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Doebler: Simulations of X-59 low-booms propagated through measured atmospheric profiles in Galveston, Texas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, 4 (2020) 2524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Loubeau, Y. Naka, B.G. Cook, V.W. Sparrow, J.M. Morgenstern: A new evaluation of noise metrics for sonic booms using existing data, in: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1685, No. 1, AIP Publishing, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. J.M. Fields: Reactions of residents to long-term sonic boom noise environments. Tech. Rep. CR-201704. NASA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  9. D.A. Hilton, V. Huckel, R. Steiner, D.J. Maglieri: Sonic-boom exposures during FAA community response studies over a six-month period in the Oklahoma City area. Tech. Rep. TN D-2539. NASA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  10. C.W. Nixon, P.N. Borsky: Effects of sonic booms on people: St. Louis, Missouri, 1961–1962. Tech. Rep. AMRL-Rept. TR-65-196. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory Report, 1965. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P.D. Schomer: Some important factors in community response to sonic booms, in: Noise-Con 2004, Baltimore, MD, July 12–14, Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. B.M. Sullivan, J. Klos, R.D. Buehrle, D.A. McCurdy, E.A. Haering Jr.: Human response to low-intensity sonic booms heard indoors and outdoors. Tech. Rep. TM-2010-216685. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Loubeau: Community response to low-amplitude sonic booms. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 19, 1 (2013) 040048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J.D. Leatherwood, B.M. Sullivan, K.P. Shepherd, D.A. McCurdy, S.A. Brown: Summary of recent NASA studies of human response to sonic booms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, 1 (2002) 586–598. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. D.A. McCurdy, S.A. Brown, R.D. Hilliard: Subjective response of people to simulated booms in their homes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116, 3 (2004) 1573–1584. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Coulouvrat: The challenges of defining an acceptable sonic boom overland, in: 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Miami (USA), 11–13 May 2009, AIAA Paper-2009-3384, 2009, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Loubeau, J. Page: Human perception of sonic booms from supersonic aircraft. Acoustics Today 14, 3 (2018) 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  18. D.J. Maglieri, P.J. Bobbitt, K.J. Plotkin, K.P. Shepherd, P.G. Coen, D.M. Richwine: Sonic boom: six decades of research. NASA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Rathsam, A. Loubeau, J. Klos: Effects of indoor rattle sounds on annoyance caused by sonic booms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138, 1 (2015) EL43–EL48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Rathsam, J. Klos, A. Loubeau, D.J. Carr, P. Davies: Effects of chair vibration on indoor annoyance ratings of sonic booms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143, 1 (2018) 489–499. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Carr, P. Davies, A. Loubeau, J. Rathsam, J. Klos: Influences of low-frequency energy and testing environment on annoyance responses to supersonic aircraft noise when heard indoors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, 1 (2020) 414–429. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Töpken, S. van de Par: Loudness and short-term annoyance of sonic boom signatures at low levels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149, 3 (2021) 2004–2015. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. J.J. Gibson: The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  24. M.A. Schmuckler: What is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy 2, 4 (2001) 419–436. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. L. Cretagne, A.C. García, R. Leconte, F. Ollivier, J. Marchal, C. Fritz, F. Coulouvrat: Design of a low frequency, impulsive sound simulator in an existing house for sonic boom perceptual studies. Acta Acustica 7 (2023) 61. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  26. S.L. Pullman: Spiral analysis: a new technique for measuring tremor with a digitizing tablet. Movement Disorders 13, S3 (1998) 85–89. [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Liebl, H. Jahncke: Review of research on the effects of noise on cognitive performance 2014–2017, in: 12th ICBEN Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem 2017. Online Resource, Paper 4017, 2017, p. 16. [Google Scholar]
  28. J.L. Szalma, P.A. Hancock: Noise effects on human performance: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 137, 4 (2011) 682–707. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. W.K. Kirchner: Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55, 4 (1958) 352–358. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. A.M. Owen, K.M. McMillan, A.R. Laird, E. Bullmore: N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping 25, 1 (2005) 46–59. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. K.J. van Engen, M. Baese-Berk, R.E. Baker, A. Choi, M. Kim, A.R. Bradlow: The Wildcat Corpus of native-and Foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language and Speech 53, 4 (2010) 510–540. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Armitage, T. Eerola: Cross-modal Transfer of Valence or Arousal from Music to Word Targets in Affective Priming? Auditory Perception & Cognition 5 (2022) 192–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Gao, D.H. Wedell, S.V. Shinkareva: Crossmodal negativity bias in semantic processing. Emotion 22, 6 (2022) 1270–1280. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Rohr, D. Wentura: How emotion relates to language and cognition, seen through the lenses of evaluative priming paradigms. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022) 911068. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. L.D. Scherer, R.J. Larsen: Cross-modal evaluative priming: emotional sounds influence the processing of emotion words. Emotion 11, 1 (2011) 203–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Marmel, L. Cretagne, L.-T. Thuong, F. Coulouvrat, C. Fritz: Impact of reduced sonic boom exposure on subjective reactions and perceptual evaluations for simulated booms presented in a realistic indoor environment. Acta Acustica (submitted for publication). [Google Scholar]
  37. F. Lovholt, K. Noren-Cosgriff, J. Park, A. Løkke: Numerical modelling of very low frequency sound transmission loss through walls from sonic boom, in: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Vol. 259, No. 6, Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 2019, pp. 3665–3674. [Google Scholar]
  38. W. Passchier-Vermeer, H. Vos, J.H.M. Steenbekkers, F.D. van der Ploeg, K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn: Sleep disturbance and aircraft noise exposure. Exposure-effect relationships. Tech. Rep. TNO, Netherlands, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Baker, V. Hazan: DiapixUK: task materials for the elicitation of multiple spontaneous speech dialogs. Behavior Research Methods 43, 3 (2011) 761–770. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Peirce, J.R. Gray, S. Simpson, M. MacAskill, R. Höchenberger, H. Sogo, E. Kastman, J.K. Lindeløv: PsychoPy2: experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods 51, 1 (2019) 195–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. J.O. Wobbrock, L. Findlater, D. Gergle, J.J. Higgins: The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures, in: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘11), Vancouver, British Columbia, May 7–12, ACM Press, New York, 2011, pp. 143–146. Honorable Mention Paper. [Google Scholar]
  42. J. Cohen: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  43. A. Soveri, J. Antfolk, L. Karlsson, B. Salo, M. Laine: Working memory training revisited: a multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24, 4 (2017) 1077–1096. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. H. van Steenbergen, G.P. Band, B. Hommel: Does conflict help or hurt cognitive control? Initial evidence for an inverted U-shape relationship between perceived task difficulty and conflict adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015) 974. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. M.M. Bradley, P.J. Lang: The International Affective Digitized Sounds (2nd edition; IADS-2): affective ratings of sounds and instruction manual. Tech. Rep. B-3, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  46. P. Gobin, A.-M. Camblats, W. Faurous, S. Mathey: Une base de l’émotionnalité (valence, arousal, catégories) de 1286 mots français selon l’âge (EMA). European Review of Applied Psychology 67, 1 (2017) 25–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. F. Pratto, O.P. John: Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 3 (1991) 380–391. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. K.C. Klauer, J. Musch: Affective priming: Findings and theories, in: J. Musch, K.C. Klauer (Eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2003, pp. 7–36. [Google Scholar]
  49. T. Folyi, D. Wentura: Fast and unintentional evaluation of emotional sound: evidence from brief segment ratings and the affective Simon task. Cognition and Emotion 31, 2 (2017) 312–324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. A.M. Abbasi, E. Darvishi, M.A. Rodrigues, K. Sayehmiri: Gender differences in cognitive performance and psychophysiological responses during noise exposure and different workloads. Applied Acoustics 189 (2022) 108602. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. F. Coulouvrat, R. Marchiano: Nonlinear Fresnel diffraction of weak shock waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114, 4 (2003) 1749–1757. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.