Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 8, 2024
Article Number 35
Number of page(s) 13
Section Virtual Acoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2024026
Published online 13 September 2024
  1. K. Eggenschwiler, K. Heutschi, A. Taghipour, R. Pieren, A. Gisladottir, B. Schäffer: Urban design of inner courtyards and road traffic noise: influence of façade characteristics and building orientation on perceived noise annoyance, Building and Environment 224 (2022) 109526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Llorca-Bofí, C. Dreier, J. Heck, M. Vorländer: Urban sound auralization and visualization framework – case study at IHTApark, Sustainability 14, 4 (2022) 18. [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Aalmoes, M. Boer, H. Verbeek: Virtual reality aircraft noise simulation for community engagement, in: Proc. INTERNOISE, Chicago, USA, 2018, pp. 1559–1566. [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Puyana-Romero, L. Lopez-Segura, L. Maffei, R. Hernández-Molina, M. Masullo: Interactive soundscapes: 360°-video based immersive virtual reality in a tool for the participatory acoustic environment evaluation of urban areas, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 103, 4 (2017) 574–588. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Stevens, D. Murphy, S. Smith: Soundscape auralisation and visualisation: a cross-modal approach to soundscape evaluation, in: Proc. DAFx, Aveiro, Portugal, 2018, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Lincke, T. Schumacher, R. Pieren: Synthesizing coherence loss by atmospheric turbulence in virtual microphone array signals, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 153, 1 (2023) 456–466. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Bresciani, J. Maillard, L. de Santana: Physics-based scintillations for outdoor sound auralization, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 154, 2 (2023) 1179–1190. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Schäffer, R. Pieren, K. Heutschi, J.M. Wunderli, S. Becker: Drone noise emission characteristics and noise effects on humans – a systematic review, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 11 (2021) 5940. [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Zawodny, A. Christian, R. Cabell: A summary of NASA research exploring the acoustics of small unmanned aerial systems, in: Proc. AHS Int. Tech. Meeting on Aeromech. Des. for Trans. Vert. Fl., San Francisco, 2018, pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  10. J.M. Wunderli, J. Meister, O. Boolakee, K. Heutschi: A method to measure and model acoustic emissions of multicopters, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, 1 (2022) 96. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Herold: In-flight directivity and sound power measurement of small-scale unmanned aerial systems, Acta Acustica 6, 58 (2022) 13. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Alkmim, J. Cardenuto, E. Tengan, T. Dietzen, T. Van Waterschoot, J. Cuenca, L. De Ryck, W. Desmet: Drone noise directivity and psychoacoustic evaluation using a hemispherical microphone array, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 152, 5 (2022) 2735–2745. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Heutschi, B. Ott, T. Nussbaumer, P. Wellig: Synthesis of real world drone signals based on lab recordings, Acta Acustica 4, 6 (2020) 24. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Lotinga, C. Ramos-Romero, N. Green, A. Torija: Noise from unconventional aircraft: a review of current measurement techniques, psychoacoustics, metrics and regulation, Current Pollution Reports 9 (2023) 724–745. [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Pieren: Auralization of environmental acoustical sceneries: synthesis of road traffic, railway and wind turbine noise. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. Virtual Acoustics – A real-time auralization framework for scientific research. Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University. Available at http://www.virtualacoustics.org, accessed on 2024-06-13. [Google Scholar]
  17. OpenDAFF – An open source file format for directional audio content. Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University. Available at http://www.opendaff.org, accessed on 2024-06-13. [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Fastl, E. Zwicker: Psychoacoustics: facts and models, ser. Springer Series in Information Sciences, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Ednie, D. Bird, K. Elliott: Fewer bat passes are detected during small, commercial drone flights, Scientific Reports 11 (2021) 11529. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Boashash: Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. I. Fundamentals, Proceedings of the IEEE 80, 4 (1992) 520–538. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Hayes: Statistical digital signal processing and modeling, ch. 8 – Spectrum estimation, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 391–492. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Mitra: Digital signal processing: a computer-based approach, ch. 6.4.2 – Digital Filter Structures – Cascade Realizations, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001, pp. 370–372. [Google Scholar]
  23. Measurement microphones – Part 8: Methods for determining the freefield sensitivity of working standard microphones by comparison. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, CH, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  24. Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 2: General method of calculation. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  25. H. Bass, L. Sutherland, A. Zuckerwar, D. Blackstock, D. Hester: Atmospheric absorption of sound: further developments, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 1 (1995) 680–683. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Moore, B. Glasberg, T. Baer: A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 45, 4 (1997) 224–240. [Google Scholar]
  27. W. Aures: Der sensorische Wohlklang als Funktion psychoakustischer Empfindungsgrössen (Sensory pleasantness as a function of psychoacoustic sensations), Acustica 58 (1985) 282–290. [Google Scholar]
  28. Psychoacoustic metrics for ITT equipment – Part 2: Models based on human perception. Geneva, CH, 2022. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.