EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 72 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 72
Number of page(s) 10
Section Computational and Numerical Acoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025057
Published online 25 November 2025
  1. WHO: Environmental Noise Guidelines for European Region. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Dutilleux: Anthropogenic sound and terrestrial ecosystems: a review of recent evidence, in: Proceedings of 12th ICBEN Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Zürich, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Sordello, O. Ratel, F. Flamerie De Lachapelle, C. Leger, A. Dambry, S. Vanpeene: Evidence of the impact of noise pollution on biodiversity: a systematic map. Environmental Evidence 9, 1 (2020) 20. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Haupert, F. Sèbe, J. Sueur: Physics-based model to predict the acoustic detection distance of terrestrial autonomous recording units over the diel cycle and across seasons: insights from an alpine and a neotropical forest. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 14, 2 (2023) 614–630. [Google Scholar]
  5. European Commission. Joint Research Centre. ICHP: Common Noise Assessment Methods in Europe (CNOSSOS-EU): to be used by the EU member states for strategic noise mapping following adoption as specified in the environmental noise directive 2002/49/EC. Publications Office, LU, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Kaltenbacher, ed.: Computational Acoustics. Vol. 579 of CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59038-7. [Google Scholar]
  7. G.C. Cohen: Higher-Order Numerical Methods for Transient Wave Equations. Vol. 110 of Scientific Computation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  8. E.M. Salomons: Computational Atmospheric Acoustics. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Hornikx: Ten questions concerning computational urban acoustics. Building and Environment 106 (2016) 409–421. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Guillaume, N. Fortin: Optimized transmission line matrix model implementation for graphics processing units computing in built-up environment. Journal of Building Performance Simulation 7, 6 (2014) 445–456. [Google Scholar]
  11. Q. Goestchel, G. Guillaume, D. Ecotière, B. Gauvreau: Analysis of the numerical properties of the transmission line matrix model for outdoor sound propagation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 531 (2022) 116974. [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Aumond, G. Guillaume, B. Gauvreau, C. Lac, V. Masson, M. Bérengier: Application of the transmission line matrix method for outdoor sound propagation modelling – part 2: experimental validation using meteorological data derived from the meso-scale model Meso-NH, Applied Acoustics 76 (2014) 107–112. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Chobeau, G. Guillaume, J. Picaut, D. Ecotière, G. Dutilleux: A transmission line matrix model for sound propagation in arrays of cylinders normal to an impedance plane. Journal of Sound and Vibration 389 (2017) 454–467. [Google Scholar]
  14. Q. Goestchel: Acoustic propagation in forest environments: time domain numerical methods toward bioacoustic applications. PhD thesis, Le Mans Université, 2023. https://theses.hal.science/tel-04357383. [Google Scholar]
  15. G.C. Cohen: Numerical Dispersion and Anisotropy, in: G.C. Cohen, ed. Higher-Order Numerical Methods for Transient Wave Equations, Scientific Computation, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2022, pp. 101–121. [Google Scholar]
  16. L.N. Trefethen: Group velocity in finite difference schemes. SIAM Review 24, 2 (1982) 113–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Bogey, C. Bailly: A family of low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for flow and noise computations. Journal of Computational Physics 194, 1 (2004) 194–214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Bailly, C. Bogey: An overview of numerical methods for acoustic wave propagation, in: European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Savioja, V. Valimaki: Reducing the dispersion error in the digital waveguide mesh using interpolation and frequency-warping techniques. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 8, 2 (2000) 184–194. [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Campos, D. Howard: On the computational efficiency of different waveguide mesh topologies for room acoustic simulation. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 13, 5 (2005) 1063–1072. [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Kagawa, T. Tsuchiya, B. Fujii, K. Fujioka: Discrete Huygen’s model approach to sound wave propagation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 218, 3 (1998) 419–444. [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Guillaume, J. Picaut, G. Dutilleux, B. Gauvreau: Time-domain impedance formulation for transmission line matrix modelling of outdoor sound propagation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 330 (26) (2011) 6467–6481. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Bruneau, Fundamentals of Acoustics. ISTE Ltd, London; Newport Beach, CA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  24. W. Duan, R. Kirby: The sound power output of a monopole source in a cylindrical pipe containing area discontinuities, in: Proceedings of Acoustics 2012, Nantes, France, 7, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. I. Rudnick: The propagation of an acoustic wave along a boundary. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 19, 2 (1947) 348–356. [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Guillaume, N. Fortin, B. Gauvreau, J. Picaut: TLM OpenCL: multi-GPUs implementation to cite this version: HAL Id: Hal-00804170, 2013, pp. 3249–3255.https://hal.science/hal-00804170/. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.