EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 73 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 73
Number of page(s) 17
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025055
Published online 27 November 2025
  1. G.V. Békésy: The structure of the middle ear and the hearing of one’s own voice by bone conduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 21, 3 (1949) 217–232. [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Pörschmann: Influences of bone conduction and air conduction on the sound of one’s own voice. ACUSTICA/Acta Acustica 86, 6 (2000) 1038–1045. [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Zurbrügg, A. Stirnemannn, M. Kuster, H. Lissek: Investigations on the physical factors influencing the ear canal occlusion effect caused by hearing aids. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 100, 3 (2014)527–536. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Killion: The hollow voice occlusion effect, in: Proceedings of 13th Danavox Symposium, 1988, pp. 231–241. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Blau, T. Sankowsky, H. Oberdanner, A. Stirnemann: Einfluss des Otoplastikprofils auf den objektiven Okklusionseffekt [influence of the earmold profile on the objective occlusion effect], in: Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA 2008, Dresden, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Denk, T. Hieke, M. Roberz, H. Husstedt: Occlusion and coupling effects with different earmold designs – all a matter of opening the ear canal? International Journal of Audiology 62, 3 (2023) 227–237. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Kuk, D. Keenan, C.-C. Lau: Vent configurations on subjective and objective occlusion effect. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16, 9 (2005) 747–762. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Ohlenbusch, C. Rollwage, S. Doclo: Modeling of speech-dependent own voice transfer characteristics for hearables with an in-ear microphone. Acta Acustica 8 (2024) 28. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Carillo, O. Doutres, F. Sgard: On the removal of the open earcanal high-pass filter effect due to its occlusion: a bone-conduction occlusion effect theory. Acta Acustica 5 (2021) 36. [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Carle, S. Laugesen, C. Nielsen: Observations on the relations among occlusion effect, compliance, and vent size. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 13 (2002) 25–37. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Laugesen, N.S. Jensen, P. Maas, C. Nielsen: Own voice qualities (OVQ) in hearing-aid users: there is more than just occlusion. International Journal of Audiology 50, 4 (2011) 226–236. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Kiessling, B. Brenner, C.T. Jespersen, J. Groth, O.D. Jensen: Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16, 4 (2005) 237–249. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Dillon: Hearing Aids. Thieme Medical Publishers, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Jürgens, P. Ihly, J. Tchorz, T. Nishiyama, C. Tanaka, D. Suzuki, S. Shinden, T. Kitama, K. Ogawa, J. Zaar, S. Laugesen, G. Jones, M. Vatti, S. Santurette: Closedness of acoustic coupling and audiological measures are associated with individual speech-in-noise benefit from noise reduction in hearing aids. Trends in Hearing 29 (2025) 23312165251325983. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Winkler, M. Latzel, I. Holube: Open versus closed hearing-aid fittings: a literature review of both fitting approaches. Trends in Hearing 20 (2016) 233121651663174. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Liebich, P. Vary: Occlusion effect cancellation in headphones and hearing devices – the sister of active noise cancellation. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 30 (2021) 35–48. [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Denk, L. Jürgensen, H. Husstedt: Evaluation of active occlusion effect cancellation in earphones by subjective, real-ear and coupler measurements. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 72, 3 (2024)145–159. [Google Scholar]
  18. K.A. Vasil-Dilaj, K.M. Cienkowski: The influence of receiver size on magnitude of acoustic and perceived measures of occlusion. American Journal of Audiology 20 (2011) 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  19. M.Ø. Hansen: Occlusion effects, Part I: hearing aid users experiences of the occlusion effect compared to the real ear sound level, Vol. report 71. Department of Acoustic Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Saint-Gaudens, H. Nélisse, F. Sgard, O. Doutres: Towards a practical methodology for assessment of the objective occlusion effect induced by earplugs. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 151, 6 (2022) 4086–4100. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Bernier, J. Voix: An active hearing protection device for musicians, in: Proceedings of 21st International Congress on Acoustics, Montreal (Canada), 2013, pp. 040015–040015. [Google Scholar]
  22. R.E. Bouserhal, A. Bernier, J. Voix: An in-ear speech database in varying conditions of the audio-phonation loop. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145, 2 (2019) 1069–1077. [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Mejia, H. Dillon, M. Fisher: Active cancellation of occlusion: an electronic vent for hearing aids and hearing protectors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124, 1 (2008) 235–240. [Google Scholar]
  24. M.C. Killion: Occlusion meter and associated method for measuring the occlusion of an occluding object in the ear canal of a subject. US Patent 5,577,511, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  25. F. Denk, M. Lettau, H. Schepker, S. Doclo, R. Roden, M. Blau, Wellmann, J. Blau, B. Kollmeier: A one-size-fits-all earpiece with multiple microphones and drivers for hearing device research, in: Audio Engineering Society Conference: 2019 AES International Conference on Headphone Technology. Audio Engineering Society, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. J.S. Bendat, A.G. Piersol: Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  27. A.L. Wicks, H. Vold: The Hs frequency response function estimator, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Modal Analysis Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Vol. 2, 1986, pp. 897–899. [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Potchinkov: Measurement of frequency responses of nonlinearly distorted SISO systems in noisy environments with generalized parameter frequency response estimators. Signal Processing 86, 8 (2006) 2094–2114. [Google Scholar]
  29. IPA: Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge University Press, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  30. M.S. Puckette: Pure data: another integrated computer music environment, in: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, San Francisco (USA), 1996. [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Blau: Acoustical measurements for everyone, in: Proceedings of Internoise ’05, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), 2005. [Google Scholar]
  32. P.D. Welch: The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 15, 2 (2023) 70–73. [Google Scholar]
  33. P.D. Hatziantoniou, J.N. Mourjopoulos: Generalized fractional-octave smoothing of audio and acoustic responses. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 48, 4 (2000) 259–280. [Google Scholar]
  34. J.S. Bendat: Statistical errors in measurement of coherence functions and input/output quantities. Journal of Sound and Vibration 59, 3 (1978) 405–421. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.