EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 17 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 17
Number of page(s) 14
Section Auditory Quality of Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2024090
Published online 03 March 2025
  1. E. Zwicker, E. Terhardt: Analytical expressions for critical-band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68 (1980) 1523–1525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. ECMA: ECMA-418 Psychoacoustic metrics for ITT equipment, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ecma-international.org/publications-and-standards/standards/ecma-418/. [Google Scholar]
  3. DIN 45681:2005-03 Acoustics – Determination of tonal components of noise and determination, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. ISO/PAS 20065:2016(E) Acoustics – Objective method for assessing the audibility of tones in noise – Engineering method. [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Aures: Berechnungsverfahren für den sensorischen Wohlklang beliebiger Schallsignale. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 59 (1985) 130–141. [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Terhardt, G. Stoll, M. Seewann: Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals. Acoustical Society of America 71 (1982)679–688. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. ISO 1996-2:2017 Acoustics – Description, measurment and assessment of environmental noise – Part 2: Determination of sound pressure level, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  8. ECMA: ECMA TR/108 Proposal of new parameters, T-TNR and T-PR for total evaluation of multiple tones, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.ecma-international.org/publications-and-standards/technical-reports/ecma-tr-108/. [Google Scholar]
  9. C.J. Plack: The Sense of Hearing. Routledge, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Zwicker, H. Fastl: Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Vol. 22. Springer Science Business Media, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Parncutt: Harmony: A Psychoacoustical Approach, M. R. Schroeder, Ed., Springer-Verlag, 1989. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A.S. Bregman: Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. MIT Press, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  13. B.C.J. Moore: An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Brill, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Terhardt: Psychoacoustic evaluation of musical sounds. Perception Psychophysics 23 (1978) 483–492. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. W.M. Hartmann: Signals, Sound, and Sensation. Springer Science Business Media, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Hots, S. Ashraf Vaghefi, J.L. Verhey: The effect of sensorineural hearing loss on suprathreshold perception of tonal components in noise. JASA Express Letters 2 (2022) 084401. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Doleschal, H. Rottengruber, J.L. Verhey: Influence parameters on the perceived magnitude of tonal content of electric vehicle interior sounds. Applied Acoustics 181 (2021) 108155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Hansen, R. Weber: Partial loudness as a measure of the magnitude of tonal content. Acoustical Science and Technology 32 (2011) 111–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J.L. Verhey, S.J. Heise: Suprathreshold perception of tonal components in noise under conditions of masking release. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 98 (2012)451–460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Fastl, G. Stoll: Scaling of pitch strength. Hearing Research 1, 4 (1979) 293–301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Zwicker, G. Glottorp, S.S. Stevens: Critical band width in loudness summation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29, 5 (1957) 548–557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Scharf: Loudness summation and spectrum shape. Journal of Acousticic Society of America 33 (1961) 838–839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Doleschal, J.L. Verhey: Pleasantness and magnitude of tonal content of electric vehicle interior sounds containing subharmonics. Applied Acoustics 185 (2022) 108442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Vormann, J.L. Verhey, V. Mellert, A. Schick: Ein adaptives Verfahren zur Bestimmung der subjektiven Tonhaltigkeit. Fortschritte der Akustik 26 (2000) 304–305. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Vormann, J.L. Verhey: Factors influencing the subjective rating of tonal components in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (1999) 1297–1298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Hansen, J.L. Verhey, R. Weber: The magnitude of tonal content: a review. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 97 (2011) 355–363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Vormann, J.L. Verhey, V. Mellert, A. Schick: Subjective rating of tonal components in noise with an adaptive procedure, in: Contributions to Psychological Acoustics: Results of the Eighth Symposium on Psychological Acoustics, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  28. ISO 226:2003 Normal equal-loudness-level contours, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Sottek, J. Becker: Tonal annoyance vs. tonal loudness and tonality, in: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  30. G. Pietila, W. Seldon, T. Roggenkamp, T. Bohn: Tonal annoyance metric development for automotive electric vehicles. SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1467, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. G.A. Gescheider: Psychophysical scaling. Annual Review of Psychology 39 (1988) 169–200. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Buus, M. Florentine, T. Poulsen: Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination, and the form of the loudness function. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (1997) 669–680. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. B. Nyman: Supplementary material for: Loudness matching of complex tones simulating sounds from electric trucks. In Acta acustica. Zenodo, 2025. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14637572 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.