EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 16 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 15
Section Aeroacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2024085
Published online 20 February 2025
  1. S.D. Prior: Reviewing and investigating the use of co-axial rotor systems in small UAVs. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles 2 (2010) 1–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Ong, S. Srigrarom, H. Hesse: Design methodology for heavy-lift unmanned aerial vehicles with coaxial rotors, in: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019, p. 2095. [Google Scholar]
  3. A.J. Torija, P. Chaitanya, Z. Li: Psychoacoustic analysis of contra-rotating propeller noise for unmanned aerial vehicles. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149, 2 (2021) 835–846. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Candeloro, D. Ragni, T. Pagliaroli: Small-scale rotor aeroacoustics for drone propulsion: a review of noise sources and control strategies. Fluids 7, 8 (2022) 279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R.S. McKay, M.J. Kingan, S.T. Go, R. Jung: Experimental and analytical investigation of contra-rotating multi-rotor UAV propeller noise. Applied Acoustics 177 (2021) 107850. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Chaitanya, P. Joseph, S.D. Prior, A.B. Parry: On the optimum separation distance for minimum noise of contra-rotating rotors. Journal of Sound and Vibration 535 (2022) 117032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Ramos-Romero, N. Green, A.J. Torija, C. Asensio: On-field noise measurements and acoustic characterisation of multi-rotor small unmanned aerial systems. Aerospace Science and Technology 141 (2023) 108537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Naz, S. Hengy, A. Ramamonjy, O. Rassy, E. Bavu: Outdoor field trials for the measurement of the acoustic signals of mini UAVs, in: e-Forum Acusticum 2020, 2020, pp. 3155–3162. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Brazinskas, S.D. Prior, J.P. Scanlan: An empirical study of overlapping rotor interference for a small unmanned aircraft propulsion system. Aerospace 3, 4 (2016) 32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Z. Wang, Q. Henricks, M. Zhuang, A. Pandey, M. Sutkowy, B. Harter, M. McCrink, J. Gregory: Impact of rotor–airframe orientation on the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of small unmanned aerial systems. Drones 3, 3 (2019) 56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S.D. Prior, J.C. Bell: Empirical measurements of small unmanned aerial vehicle co-axial rotor systems. Journal of Science and Innovation 1, 1 (2011) 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Whiteside, N. Zawodny, X. Fei, N.A. Pettingill, M.D. Patterson, P. Rothhaar: An exploration of the performance and acoustic characteristics of UAV-scale stacked rotor configurations, in: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 2019, p. 1071. [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Jacobellis, R. Singh, C. Johnson, J. Sirohi, R. McDonald: Experimental and computational investigation of stacked rotor performance in hover. Aerospace Science and Technology 116 (2021) 106847. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Platzer, M. Hajek, J. Rauleder, P. Mortimer, J. Sirohi: Investigation of the flow fields of coaxial stacked and counter-rotating rotors using PIV measurements and URANS simulations, in: Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society’s 77th Annual Forum and Technology Display, Virtual, 2021, pp. 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  15. D.W. Kurtz, J.E. Marte: A review of aerodynamic noise from propellers, rotors, and lift fans, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  16. R.A. Piziali, F.F Felker: Reduction of unsteady recirculation in hovering model helicopter rotor testing. Journal of the American Helicopter Society 32, 1 (1987) 54–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R.W. Paterson, R.K. Amiet: Noise of a model helicopter rotor due to ingestion of turbulence. Technical report, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  18. J.H. Stephenson, D. Weitsman, N.S. Zawodny: Effects of flow recirculation on unmanned aircraft system (UAS) acoustic measurements in closed anechoic chambers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 3 (2019) 1153–1155. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Weitsman, J.H. Stephenson, N.S. Zawodny: Effects of flow recirculation on acoustic and dynamic measurements of rotary-wing systems operating in closed anechoic chambers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, 3 (2020) 1325–1336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. O. Hertzman, S. Fligelman, O. Stalnov: Abatement of a multi-rotor tonal noise component with phase control technology, in: 28th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics 2022 Conference, 2022, p. 2834. [Google Scholar]
  21. C.R. Russell, J. Jung, G. Willink, B. Glasner: Wind tunnel and hover performance test results for multicopter UAS vehicles, in: American Helicopter Society (AHS) International Annual Forum and Technology Display, number ARC-E-DAA-TN31096, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  22. ISO ISO3744: Acoustics–determination of sound power levels and sound energy levels of noise sources using sound pressure–engineering methods for an essentially free field over a reflecting plane. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Bilka, J. Anthoine, C. Schram: Design and evaluation of an aeroacoustic wind tunnel for measurement of axial flow fans. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130, 6 (2011) 3788–3796. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. R.W. Deters, S. Kleinke, M.S. Selig: Static testing of propulsion elements for small multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles, in: 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2017, p. 3743. [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Gallo, J. de Decker, P. Haezebrouck, A. Zarri, C. Schram: H2020 Enodise: experimental dataset of configuration C VKI, September 2023. [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Glegg, W. Devenport: Chapter 8 – turbulence and stochastic processes, in: S. Glegg, W. Devenport, (Eds.) Aeroacoustics of Low Mach Number Flows. Academic Press, 2017, pp. 163–184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. F. Jacobsen, T. Poulsen, J.H. Rindel, A.C. Gade, M. Ohlrich: Fundamentals of acoustics and noise control, 2011. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.