EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 78 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 78
Number of page(s) 13
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025062
Published online 08 December 2025
  1. G. Keidser, N. Graham, D. Brungart, A. Caduff, J. Campos, S. Carlile, M.G. Carpenter, G. Grimm, V. Hohmann, I. Holube, S. Launer, T. Lunner, R. Mehra, F. Rapport, M. Slaney, K. Smeds: The quest for ecological validity in hearing science: What it is, Why it matters, and How to advance it. Ear and Hearing 41 (2020) 5S–19S. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Tarlao, D. Steele, C. Guastavino: Assessing the ecological validity of soundscape reproduction in different laboratory settings. PLoS One 17 (2022) e0270401. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Guastavino, B.F.G. Katz, J.-D. Polack, D.J. Levitin, D. Dubois: Ecological validity of soundscape reproduction. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 91 (2005) 333–341. [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Oberman, K. Jambrošić, M. Horvat, B. Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci: Using virtual soundwalk approach for assessing sound art soundscape interventions in public spaces. Applied Sciences 10 (2020) 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  5. V. Fraisse, N. Schütz, M.M. Wanderley, C. Guastavino, N. Misdariis: Using soundscape simulation to evaluate compositions for a public space sound installation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156 (2024) 1183–1201. [Google Scholar]
  6. W.J. Davies, N.S. Bruce, J.E. Murphy: Soundscape reproduction and synthesis. Acta Acustica 100 (2014) 285–292. [Google Scholar]
  7. A.S. Sudarsono, Y.W. Lam, W.J. Davies: The effect of sound level on perception of reproduced soundscapes. Applied Acoustics 110 (2016) 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  8. L.F. Hermida Cadena, A.C. Lobo Soares, I. Pavón, J.L. Bento Coelho: Assessing soundscape: comparison between in situ and laboratory methodologies. Noise Mapping 4 (2017) 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Yang, J. Kang: Perception difference for approaching and receding sound sources of a listener in motion in architectural sequential spaces. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 151 (2022) 685–699. [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Lu, S.-K. Lau: Examining the ecological validity of VR experiments in soundscape and landscape research. Computers in Human Behavior 162 (2025) 108462. [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Li, S.-K. Lau: A review of audio-visual interaction on soundscape assessment in urban built environments. Applied Acoustics 166 (2020) 107372. [Google Scholar]
  12. L.D. Braida, J.S. Lim, J.E. Berliner, N.I. Durlach, W.M. Rabinowitz, S.R. Purks: Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 (1984) 722–731. [Google Scholar]
  13. L.M. Ward: Remembrance of sounds past: memory and psychophysical scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13 (1987) 216–227. [Google Scholar]
  14. M.C. Botte, C. Baruch, S. Mönikheim: Memory for loudness: the role of loudness contour, in: Advances in the Auditory Physiology and Perception: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Hearing held in Carcens, France, 9–14 June, 1991, pp. 305–311. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Clément, L. Demany, C. Semal: Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (1999) 2805–2811. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Kumar, S. Joseph, P.E. Gander, N. Barascud, A.R. Halpern, T.D. Griffiths: A brain system for auditory working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 36 (2016) 4492–4505. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Hellbrück: Memory effects in loudness scaling of traffic noise – How overall loudness of short-term and long-term sounds depends on memory. Acoustical Science and Technology 21 (2000) 329–332. [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Dittrich, D. Oberfeld: A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126 (2009) 3168–3178. [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Lee, D. Müllensiefen: The Timbre Perception Test (TPT): a new interactive musical assessment tool to measure timbre perception ability. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 82 (2020) 3658–3675. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. von Berg, J. Steffens, S. Weinzierl, D. Müllensiefen: Assessing room acoustic listening expertise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 150 (2021) 2539–2548. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. von Berg, H. Himmelein, J. Steffens: Effects of noise sensitivity and listening effort on perceptual ratings of background noise. JASA Express Letters 4 (2024) 084401. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Schütte, A. Marks, E. Wenning, B. Greifahn: The development of the noise sensitivity questionnaire. Noise & Health 9 (2007) 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Eikmann, A.Z. Nieden, D. Ziedorn, K. Römer, A. Lengler, S. Harpel, J. Pons-Kühnemann, H. Hudel, J. Spilski: Blood pressure monitoring, in: Vol. 5, Final report of NORAH: Research programm on Noise-Related Annoyance, Cognition and Health: A Transportation Noise Effects Monitoring Program in Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Müllensiefen, B. Gingras, J. Musil, L. Stewart: The musicality of non-musicians: an index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PloS One 9 (2014) e89642. [Google Scholar]
  25. ISO 532-1: Acoustics – Methods for calculating loudness–Part 1: Zwicker method, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Versümer, J. Steffens, S. Weinzierl: Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 153 (2023) 2956–2972. [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Cohen: Statistical Power Analysis in the Behavorial Sciences. Routledge, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  28. N. Meyer-Kahlen, S. de las Heras Peréz, T. Lokki: Expected levels of reproduced speech, in: AES 5th International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality. Audio Engineering Society, 2024. https://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=22661. [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Susini, O. Houix, L. Seropian, G. Lemaitre: Is loudness part of a sound recognition process? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 146 (2019) EL172. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Kliuchko, M. Heinonen-Guzejev, P. Vuust, M. Tervaniemi, E. Brattico: A window into the brain mechanisms associated with noise sensitivity. Scientific Reports 6 (2016) 39236. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Kreiman, B.R. Gerrat, K. Precoda: Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33 (1990) 103–115. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.