EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 60 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 60
Number of page(s) 11
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025048
Published online 17 October 2025
  1. D.W. Robinson, L.S. Whittle: The loudness of directional sound fields. Acustica 10 (1960) 74–80. [Google Scholar]
  2. V.P. Sivonen: Directional loudness and binaural summation for wideband and reverberant sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121, 5 (2007) 2852–2861. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. V.P. Sivonen, W. Ellermeier: Directional loudness in an anechoic sound field, head-related transfer functions, and binaural summation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119, 5 (2006) 2965–2980. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. V.P. Sivonen, W. Ellermeier: Binaural loudness for artificial-head measurements in directional sound fields. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 56, 6 (2008) 452–461. [Google Scholar]
  5. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 532-2:2017. Acoustics – Methods for calculating loudness. Part 2: Moore-Glasberg method. Standard, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 532-3:2023. Acoustics – Methods for calculating loudness. Part 3: Moore-Glasberg-Schlittenlacher method. Standard, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Fiebig, F. Hochbaum, F. Brinkmann: Experimental study on sharpness and roughness sensations with varying source positions in the horizontal plane, in: DAS – DAGA – 51st Annual Meeting on Acoustics, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2025, pp. 1104–1107. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Fastl, E. Zwicker: Psychoacoustics: facts and models, 2nd edn, vol. 22. Springer Series in Information Sciences. Springer Nature, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Maschke, A. Jakob: Psychoakustische Messtechnik. In: Möser M, Ed. Messtechnik der Akustik. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 599–642. [Google Scholar]
  10. G.V. Bismarck: Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds. Acustica 30 (1974) 159–172. [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Aures: Berechnungsverfahren für den Wohlklang beliebiger Schallsignale. Ein Beitrag zur gehörbezogenen Schallanalyse. Dissertation. Technische Universität München, München, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  12. Deutsches Institut für Normung: DIN 45692:2009-08. Measurement technique for the simulation of the auditory sensation of sharpness. Standard. Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Fiebig, R. Sottek, V. Tarasova: Wahrnehmung der Schärfe von instationären technischen Schallen. In: Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA 2008 – Dresden, 2017, pp. 780–783. [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Ellermeier, J. Hellbrück: Hören – Psychoakustik – Audiologie. In: Weinzierl S, Ed. Handbuch der Audiotechnik. VDI-Buch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 41–85. [Google Scholar]
  15. X.-L. Zhong, F.-C. Zhang, B.-S. Xie: On the spatial symmetry of head-related transfer functions. Applied Acoustics 74, 6 (2013) 856–864. [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Xie: Head-related transfer function and virtual auditory display, 2nd edn. J. Ross Publishing, Plantation, FL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. M.H.A. Bunse: Binaurale Rauhigkeit räumlich verteilter Schallquellen. In: Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA 1993, 1993, pp. 848–852. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Klemenz, J. Fels: Zur Berechnung psychoakustischer Grösen mehrerer Schallquellen. In: Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA 2002 – Bochum, 2002, pp. 502–503. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Segura-Garcia, J. Navarro-Ruiz, J. Perez-Solano, J. Montoya-Belmonte, S. Felici-Castell, M. Cobos, A. Torres-Aranda: Spatio-temporal analysis of urban acoustic environments with binaural psychoacoustical considerations for IoT-based applications. Sensors 18, 3 (2018) 690. [Google Scholar]
  20. B.C.J. Moore, B.R. Glasberg: Modeling binaural loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121, 3 (2007) 1604–1612. [Google Scholar]
  21. International Organization for Standardization: ISO/TS 12913-2:2018. Akustik – Soundscape – Teil 2: Anforderungen an die Datenerhebung und die Dokumentation. Standard, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  22. International Organization for Standardization: ISO/TS 12913-3:2019. Akustik – Soundscape – Teil 3: Datenanalyse. Standard, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Brinkmann, S. Weinzierl: AKtools – an open software toolbox for signal acquisition, processing, and inspection in acoustics. In: 142nd AES Convention, Berlin, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Font, G. Roma, X. Serra: Freesound technical demo. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia, ACM, 2013, pp. 411–412. [Google Scholar]
  25. A.P. Soares, A.P. Pinheiro, A. Costa, C. Frade, M. Comesaña: Affective auditory stimuli: adaptation of the International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS-2) for European Portuguese. Behavior Research Methods 45 (2013) 1168–1181. [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Pires, M. Vieira, H. C. Yehia, T. Brookes, R. Mason: A new set of directional weights for ITUR BS.1770 loudness measurement of multichannel audio. ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries 3, 1 (2020) pp. 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  27. F. Brinkmann, A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl, S.V.D. Par, M. Müller-Trapet, R. Opdam, M. Vorländer: A high resolution and full-spherical head-related transfer function database for different head-above-torso orientations. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 65, 10 (2017) 841–848. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Fredelake, I. Holube: Qualitätsbeurteilungen durch Paarvergleich. Zeitschrift für Audiologie 49, 4 (2010) 149–156. [Google Scholar]
  29. W. Ellermeier, K. Zimmer: Using psychological choice models to investigate overall sound quality. In: First ISCA Workshop on Auditory Quality of Systems, Akademie Mont-Cenis, Germany, 23–25 April 2003, pp. 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Choisel, F. Wickelmaier: Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: Scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121, 1 (2007) 388–400. [Google Scholar]
  31. E. Parizet: Paired comparison listening tests and circular error rates. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 88 (2002), 594–598. [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Lakens: Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology 4 (2013) 863. [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Sottek, J. Becker: Modellierung der psychoakustischen Rauigkeit. In: DAGA 2019 – Rostock, 2019, pp. 832–835. [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Kleczkowski, M. Pluta, P. Macura, E. Paczkowska: Listeners who have low hearing thresholds do not perform better in difficult listening tasks. In: 132nd AES Convention, Convention Paper 8641, Budapest, Hungary, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  35. W. Ellermeier, M. Mader, P. Daniel: Scaling the unpleasantness of sounds according to the BTL model: Ratio-scale representation and psychoacoustical analysis. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 90 (2004) 101–107. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.