Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 56
Number of page(s) 13
Section Structural Acoustics and Vibroacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025040
Published online 16 September 2025
  1. J.L. Romanillos: Antonio de Torres, Guitar maker: his life and work. Kahn & Averill, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Viala, M.A. Pérez, V. Placet, A. Manjon, E. Foltête, S. Cogan: Towards model-based approaches for musical instruments making: validation of the model of a Spanish guitar soundboard and characterization features proposal. Applied Acoustics 172 (2021) 107591. [Google Scholar]
  3. J.A. Torres, R.R. Boullosa: Influence of the bridge on the vibrations of the top plate of a classical guitar. Applied Acoustics 70, 11–12 (2009) 1371–1377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Bretos, C. Santamarıa, J.A. Moral: Finite element analysis and experimental measurements of natural eigenmodes and random responses of wooden bars used in musical instruments. Applied Acoustics 56, 3, (1999) 141–156. [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Viala, V. Placet, S. Cogan: Model-based evidence of the dominance of the guitar brace design over material and climatic variability for dynamic behaviors. Applied Acoustics 182 (2021) 108275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G.O. Paiva, M. Queiroz, M.R. Machado: Study of the influence of wood mechanical properties variability on the sound synthesis of a simplified string instrument, in: Dimitrovová Z, Biswas P, Gonçalves R, Silva T (Eds), International Conference on Wave Mechanics and Vibrations. Springer, 2022, pp. 890–899. [Google Scholar]
  7. C.J. Maxwell, R.M. Scheller: Identifying habitat holdouts for high elevation tree species under climate change. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 2 (2020) 94. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Brauchler, S. Gonzalez, M. Vierneisel, P. Ziegler, F. Antonacci, A. Sarti, P. Eberhard: Model-predicted geometry variations to compensate material variability in the design of classical guitars. Scientific Reports 13, 1 (2023) 12766. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Cillo, P. Ziegler, P. Eberhard, Geometrical parameterization of a finite element model to account for material variability in classical guitar design, in: Proceedings of ISMA, Leuven, Belgium, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  10. Abaqus: Analysis User’s Guide, Version 6.14. Simulia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. MathWorks: Matlab, release 2023b, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Polychronopoulos, K. Bakogiannis, D. Marini, G.T. Kouroupetroglou: Optimization method on the tuning, sound quality, and ergonomics of the ancient guitar using a dsp-fem simulation, IEEE Access 10 (2022) 133574–133583. [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Kaselouris, M. Bakarezos, M. Tatarakis, N.A. Papadogiannis, V. Dimitriou: A review of finite element studies in string musical instruments. Acoustics 4, 1 (2022) 183–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. K.-J. Bathe: Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  15. R.L. Taylor, O.C. Zienkiewicz: The finite element method. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  16. K.-J. Bathe, E.N. Dvorkin: A four-node plate bending element based on Mindlin/Reissner plate theory and a mixed interpolation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 21, 2 (1985) 367–383. [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Nguyen-Thanh, T. Rabczuk, H. Nguyen-Xuan, S.P. Bordas: A smoothed finite element method for shell analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 198, 2 (2008) 165–177. [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Sangtarash, H.G. Arab, M.R. Sohrabi, M.R. Ghasemi: Formulation and evaluation of a new four-node quadrilateral element for analysis of the shell structures. Engineering with Computers 36 (2020) 1289–1303. [Google Scholar]
  19. R.D. Cook, D.S. Malkus, M.E. Plesha: Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  20. J.C. Simo, M. Rifai: A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 29, 8 (1990) 1595–1638. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Bischoff: Finite elements for plates and shells, in: Altenbach, H, Öchsner, A (Eds), Encyclopedia of continuum mechanics. Springer, 2020, pp. 898–920. [Google Scholar]
  22. W.K. Liu, J.S.-J. Ong, R.A. Uras: Finite element stabilization matrices-a unification approach. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 53, 1 (1985) 13–46. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Vierneisel, F. Geiger, M. Bischoff, P. Eberhard: Derivation of geometrically parameterized shell elements in the context of shape optimization, in: Optimal Design and Control of Multibody Systems, Vol. 42 of IUTAM Bookseries, Springer, 2024, pp. 62–74. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Ibrahimbegovic, R.L. Taylor, E.L. Wilson: A robust quadrilateral membrane finite element with drilling degrees of freedom. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 30, 3 (1990) 445–457. [Google Scholar]
  25. B. Fröhlich, J. Gade, F. Geiger, M. Bischoff, P. Eberhard: Geometric element parameterization and parametric model order reduction in finite element based shape optimization, Computational Mechanics 63 (2019) 853–868. [Google Scholar]
  26. M. French: An improved body shape definition for acoustic guitars. arXiv preprint, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.00439. [Google Scholar]
  27. R. M. French: Engineering the guitar: theory and practice. Springer, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Alexa, Recent advances in mesh morphing. Computer Graphics Forum 21, 2 (2002) 173–198. [Google Scholar]
  29. Y. Lee, H.S. Kim, S. Lee: Mesh parameterization with a virtual boundary, Computers & Graphics 26, 5 (2002) 677–686. [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Benner, S. Gugercin, K. Willcox: A survey of projection-based model reduction methods for parametric dynamical systems. SIAM Review 57, 4 (2015) 483–531. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Z. Bai: Krylov subspace techniques for reduced-order modeling of large-scale dynamical systems. Applied Numerical Mathematics 43, 1–2 (2002) 9–44. [Google Scholar]
  32. N. Walker, B. Fröhlich, P. Eberhard: Model order reduction for parameter dependent substructured systems using Krylov subspaces. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 2 (2018) 553–558. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Brauchler, D. Hose, P. Ziegler, M. Hanss, P. Eberhard: Distinguishing geometrically identical instruments: Possibilistic identification of material parameters in a parametrically model order reduced finite element model of a classical guitar. Journal of Sound and Vibration 535 (2022) 117071. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. R.J. Allemang: The modal assurance criterion – twenty years of use and abuse. Sound and Vibration 37, 8 (2003) 14–23. [Google Scholar]
  35. D. Kretschmann: Mechanical properties of wood, in: Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material, Centennial edn., General technical report FPL; GTR-190. US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, 2010, pp. 5.1-5.46. [Google Scholar]
  36. I.M. Sobol, D. Asotsky, A. Kreinin, S. Kucherenko: Construction and comparison of high-dimensional Sobol’ generators. Wilmott 2011, 56 (2011) 64–79. [Google Scholar]
  37. A.G. Asuero, A. Sayago, A.G. González: The correlation coefficient: an overview. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 36, 1 (2006) 41–59. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.