Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 44
Number of page(s) 12
Section Environmental Noise
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026045
Published online 16 June 2026
  1. B.L. Diffey: An overview analysis of the time people spend outdoors. British Journal of Dermatology 164, 4 (2011) 848–854. [Google Scholar]
  2. N.E. Klepeis, W.C. Nelson, W.R. Ott, J.P. Robinson, A.M. Tsang, P. Switzer, J.V. Behar, S.C. Hern, W.H. Engelmann: The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 11, 3, (2001) 231–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Herstellerverband Raumlufttechnische Geräte e. V.: RLT-Branche verzeichnet viertes Wachstumsjahr in Folge – Beitrag zur Energiewende und Gesundheit, 2025. https://rlt-geraete.de/rlt-branche-verzeichnet-viertes-wachstumsjahr-in-folge-beitrag-zur-energiewende-und-gesundheit/ (accessed on 09/09/2025). [Google Scholar]
  4. World Health Organization et al.: Combined or multiple exposure to health stressors in indoor built environments: an evidence-based review prepared for the WHO training workshop “Multiple environmental exposures and risks”: 16–18 October 2013, Bonn, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Pellegatti, S. Torresin, C. Visentin, F. Babich, N. Prodi: Indoor soundscape, speech perception, and cognition in classrooms: a systematic review on the effects of ventilation-related sounds on students. Building and Environment 236 (2023) 110194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin: Technische Regeln für Arbeitsstätten. Lärm, ASR A3.7, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. DIN EN ISO 16032: Acoustics – Measurement of sound pressure level from service equipment or activities in buildings – Engineering method (ISO 16032:2024), Tech. Rep. DIN EN ISO 16032, Deutsches Institut für Normung, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Guski, U. Felscher-Suhr, R. Schuemer: The concept of noise annoyance: How international experts see it. Journal of Sound and Vibration 223, 4 (1999) 513–527. [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Ellermeier, F. Kattner, E. Klippenstein, M. Kreis, C. Marquis-Favre: Short-term noise annoyance and electrodermal response as a function of sound-pressure level, cognitive task load, and noise sensitivity. Noise and Health 22, 105 (2020) 46–55. [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Zimmer, W. Ellermeier, C. Schmid: Using probabilistic choice models to investigate auditory unpleasantness. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 90, 6 (2004) 1019–1028. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Töpken, S. Van de Par: Perceptual dimensions of fan noise and their relationship to indexes based on the specific loudness. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 105, 1 (2019) 195–209. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Töpken, S. Van de Par: Determination of preference-equivalent levels for fan noise and their prediction by indices based on specific loudness patterns. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, 6 (2019) 3399–3409. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Schneider, C. Feldmann: Psychoacoustic evaluation of fan noise, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Fan Noise, Fan Technology and Numerical Methods, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Susini, S. McAdams, S. Winsberg, I. Perry, S. Vieillard, X. Rodet: Characterizing the sound quality of air-conditioning noise. Applied Acoustics 65, 8 (2004) 763–790. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Hohls, T. Biermeier, R. Balschke, S. Becker: Psychoacoustic analysis of HVAC noise with equal loudness, in: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings. Vol. 249. Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 2014, pp. 1800–1806. [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Scouarnec, S. Bennouna: Psychoacoustic assessment of automotive fan-systems, in: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings. Vol. 270. Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 2024, pp. 105–114. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Bennouna, S. Muhr, S. Dutta, L. Liu, D. Kurniawan: Noise metrics and subjective assessment of automotive HVAC systems, in: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings. Vol. 266. Institute of Noise Control Engineering, 2023, pp. 744–751. [Google Scholar]
  18. K.W. Ma, C.M. Mak, F.L.K. Chung, H.M. Wong: Prediction of psychological impacts of noise from ventilation systems, in: Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics. Vol. 52. Acoustical Society of America, 2023, p. 025001. [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Davies, N. Broner, J.R. Kim: A case study on predicting noise annoyance due to heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems in buildings, in: Proc Int Congress on Acoustics, Tokyo, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  20. U. Ayr, E. Cirillo, F. Martellotta: An experimental study on noise indices in air conditioned offices. Applied Acoustics 62, 6 (2001) 633–643. [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Ostmann, M. Kremer, D. Müller: Identification of the aeroacoustic emission source regions within a ceiling swirl diffuser, in: Acoustics. Vol. 7. MDPI AG, 2025, p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Ostmann, M. Kremer, D. Müller: Identifying and optimizing the aeroacoustic source regions of a slot air diffuser. Applied Acoustics 241 (2026) 111002. [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Wickelmaier, N. Umbach, K. Sergin, S. Choisel: Scaling sound quality using models for paired-comparison and ranking data, in: Conference Paper, DAGA 2012 Congress 38th German Annual Conference on Acoustics, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  24. DIN EN ISO 3745: Akustik – Bestimmung der Schallleistungs- und Schallenergiepegel von Geräuschquellen aus Schalldruckmessungen – Verfahren Genuaigkeitsklasse 1 für reflexionsarme Räume und Halbräume. Tech. Rep. DIN EN ISO 3745, Deutsches Institut für Normung, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Schröder: Physically Based Real-time Auralization of Interactive Virtual Environments. Vol. 11. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  26. Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, Room Acoustics for Virtual ENvironments (RAVEN) – a GA-based room acoustic simulation environment. Software freely available for academic purposes. https://www.virtualacoustics.org/RAVEN (accessed on 23/07/2025). [Google Scholar]
  27. DIN 45631:1991-03: Berechnung des Lautstärkepegels und der Lautheit aus dem Geräuschspektrum; Verfahren nach E. Zwicker, Tech. Rep. DIN 45631:1991-03, Deutsches Institut für Normung, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  28. DIN 45692:2009-08: Messtechnische Simulation der Hörempfindung Schärfe, Tech. Rep. DIN 45692:2009-08, Deutsches Institut für Normung, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  29. ECMA-418-2 (1st Edn.): Psychoacoustic metrics for ITT equipment – Part 2 (models based on human perception). Tech. Rep. ECMA-418-2, ECMA International, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  30. ECMA-74 (17th Edn.): Measurement of airborne noise emitted by information technology and telecommunications equipment. Tech. Rep. ECMA-74, Ecma International, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. You, J.Y. Jeon: Just noticeable differences in sound quality metrics for refrigerator noise. Noise Control Engineering Journal 56, 6 (2008) 414–424. [Google Scholar]
  32. M.G. Kendall, B.B. Smith: On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 31, 3/4 (1940) 324–345. [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Schwarz, Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6, 2 (1978) 461–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.