EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 38 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 38
Number of page(s) 11
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026038
Published online 19 May 2026
  1. M. Lavandier, J.F. Culling: Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility against noise in rooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 1 (2010) 387–399. ISSN 0001-4966. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Beutelmann, T. Brand, B. Kollmeier: Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 4 (2010) 2479–2497. ISSN 0001-4966. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Wan, N.I. Durlach, H.S. Colburn: Application of an extended equalization-cancellation model to speech intelligibility with spatially distributed maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 6 (2010) 3678–3690. ISSN 0001-4966. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Jelfs, M. Lavandier, J.F. Culling: Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise. Hearing Research 275 (2011) 96–104. [Google Scholar]
  5. A.H. Andersen, J.M. de Haan, Z.-H. Tan, J. Jensen: A method for predicting the intelligibility of noisy and non-linearly enhanced binaural speech, in: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, Shanghai, 2016, pp. 4995–4999. ISBN 978-1-4799-9988-0. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Chabot-Leclerc, E.N. MacDonald, T. Dau: Predicting binaural speech intelligibility using the signal-to-noise ratio in the envelope power spectrum domain. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, 1 (2016) 192–205. ISSN 0001-4966. [Google Scholar]
  7. C.F. Hauth, T. Brand: Modeling sluggishness in binaural unmasking of speech for maskers with time-varying interaural phase differences. Trends in Hearing 22 (2018) 2331216517753547. [Google Scholar]
  8. C.F. Hauth, S.C. Berning, B. Kollmeier, T. Brand: Modeling binaural unmasking of speech using a blind binaural processing stage. Trends in Hearing 24 (2020) 233121652097563. ISSN 2331-2165, 2331-2165. [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Hohmann: Frequency analysis and synthesis using a gammatone filterbank. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 88, 3 (2002) 433–442. [Google Scholar]
  10. N.I. Durlach: Equalization and cancellation theory of binaural masking-level differences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35, 8 (1963) 1206–1218. ISSN 0001-4966. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. ANSI S3.5-1997: Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  12. H.J.M. Steeneken, T. Houtgast: A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67, 1 (1980) 318–326. ISSN 0001-4966. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. C.H. Taal, R.C. Hendriks, R. Heusdens, J. Jensen: An algorithm for intelligibility prediction of time–frequency weighted noisy speech. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 19, 7 (2011) 2125–2136. ISSN 1558-7916, 1558-7924. [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Feng, F. Chen: Nonintrusive objective measurement of speech intelligibility: a review of methodology. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 71 (2022) 103204. ISSN 17468094. [Google Scholar]
  15. J.F. Culling, M.L. Hawley, R.Y. Litovsky: Erratum: the role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118, 1 (2005) 552–552. ISSN 0001-4966. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. vom Hövel: Zur Bedeutung der Übertragungseigenschaften des Aussenohrs sowie des Binauralen Hörsystems bei Gestörter Sprachübertragung (On the importance of the transmission properties of the outer ear and the binaural auditory system in disturbed speech transmission). Ph.D. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  17. T.L. Langford, L.A. Jeffress: Effect of noise crosscorrelation on binaural signal detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 36, 8 (1964) 1455–1458. [Google Scholar]
  18. J.P. Egan: Masking-level differences as a function of interaural disparities in intensity of signal and of noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 36, 10 (1964) 1992–1992. ISSN 0001-4966. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. van de Par, A. Kohlrausch: Dependence of binaural masking level differences on center frequency, masker bandwidth, and interaural parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106, 4 (1999) 1940–1947. ISSN 0001-4966. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. L.R. Bernstein, C. Trahiotis: The normalized correlation: accounting for binaural detection across center frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 6 (1996) 3774–3784. ISSN 0001-4966. [Google Scholar]
  21. P.M. Zurek, N.I. Durlach: Masker-bandwidth dependence in homophasic and antiphasic tone detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81, 2 (1987) 459–464. ISSN 0001-4966. [Google Scholar]
  22. I.J. Hirsh: The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 20, 4 (1948) 536–544. ISSN 0001-4966. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Mcalpine, S. Thompson, K. Von Kriegstein, T. Marquardt, T. Griffiths, A. Deane-Pratt: A π-limit for coding ITDs: neural responses and the binaural display, in: B. Kollmeier, G. Klump, V. Hohmann, U. Langemann, M. Mauermann, S. Uppenkamp, J. Verhey, Eds. Hearing – From Sensory Processing to Perception. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 399–406. ISBN 978-3-540-73009-5. [Google Scholar]
  24. N.I. Durlach: Binaural signal detection: equalization and cancellation theory, in: J.V. Tobias, Ed. Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory. Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, 1972, pp. 369–462. [Google Scholar]
  25. L.H. Carney: Supra-threshold hearing and fluctuation profiles: implications for sensorineural and hidden hearing loss. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 19, 4 (2018) 331–352. ISSN 1525-3961, 1438-7573. [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Hülsmeier, B. Kollmeier: How much individualization is required to predict the individual effect of suprathreshold processing deficits? Assessing Plomp’s distortion component with psychoacoustic detection thresholds and FADE. Hearing Research 426 (2022) 108609. ISSN 0378-5955. [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Neher, K.C. Wagener, M. Latzel: Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario. Hearing Research 353 (2017) 36–48. ISSN 03785955. [Google Scholar]
  28. K.C. Wagener, V. Kühnel, B. Kollmeier: Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die Deutsche Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and evaluation of a sentence test for the German language I: design of the Oldenburg sentence test]. Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38, 1 (1999) 4–15. [Google Scholar]
  29. K.C. Wagener, T. Brand, B. Kollmeier: Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die Deutsche Sprache Teil II: Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and evaluation of a sentence test for the German language II: optimization of the Oldenburg sentence test]. Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38, 2 (1999) 44–56. [Google Scholar]
  30. K.C. Wagener, T. Brand, B. Kollmeier: Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die Deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and evaluation of a sentence test for the German language III: evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test]. Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38, 3 (1999) 86–95. [Google Scholar]
  31. T. Brand, B. Kollmeier: Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, 6 (2002) 2801–2810. ISSN 0001-4966. [Google Scholar]
  32. B.C.J. Moore, B.R. Glasberg: Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74, 3 (1983) 750–753. ISSN 0001-4966. [Google Scholar]
  33. International Organization for Standardization: Acoustics – Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment – Part 7: Reference Threshold of Hearing Under Free-Field and Diffuse-Field Listening Conditions. ISO 389-7:2019, 2019. EN ISO 389-7:2019, Edition 3. [Google Scholar]
  34. R. Beutelmann, T. Brand, B. Kollmeier: Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126, 3 (2009) 1359–1368. ISSN 0001-4966. [Google Scholar]
  35. C. Zerbs: Modelling the effective binaural signal processing in the auditory systems. Dissertation, Universität of Oldenburg, 2000. URL http://medi.uni-oldenburg.de/download/docs/diss/zerbs_diss_2000.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Culling: Equalization-cancellation revisited, in: Forum Acusticum 2020, Lyon, France, 2020, pp. 1913–1917. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.