EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 17 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 17
Number of page(s) 18
Section Virtual Acoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026012
Published online 17 March 2026
  1. J. Skowronek, A. Raake, G.H. Berndtsson, O.S. Rummukainen, P. Usai, Simon, N.B. Gunkel, M. Johanson, E.A.P. Habets, L. Malfait, D. Lindero, A. Toet: Quality of experience in telemeetings and videoconferencing: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 10 (2022) 63885–63931. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Kuhn-Rahloff: Realitätstreue, Natürlichkeit, Plausibilität: Perzeptive Beurteilungen in der Elektroakustik. Ph.D. thesis, TU Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl: Assessing the plausibility of virtual acoustic environments. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 98, 5 (2012) 804–810. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Neidhardt, C. Schneiderwind, F. Klein: Perceptual matching of room acoustics for auditory augmented reality in small rooms – literature review and theoretical framework. Trends in Hearing 26, January 2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Meyer-Kahlen, S. Schlecht, S.V. Amengual Garí, T. Lokki: Testing auditory illusions in augmented reality: plausibility, transfer-plausibility, and authenticity. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 72, 11 (2024) 797–812. [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Schneiderwind, A. Neidhardt: Discriminability of concurrent virtual and real sound sources in an augmented audio scenario, in: 152nd AES Convention, paper 10604, The Hague, The Netherlands/Online, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Neidhardt, A.M. Zerlik: The availability of a real hidden reference affects the plausibility of position-dynamic auditory AR. Frontiers in VR, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. S.A. Wirler, N. Meyer-Kahlen, S.J. Schlecht: Towards transfer-plausibility for evaluating mixed reality audio in complex scenes, in: Audio Engineering Society Conference: 2020 AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality. Audio Engineering Society, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Immohr, G. Rendle, A. Lammert, A. Neidhardt, V.B. Heyde, A. Raake: Evaluating the effect of binaural auralization on audiovisual plausibility and communication behavior in virtual reality, in: 2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 2024. [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Immohr, G. Rendle, C. Kehling, A. Lammert, S. Göring, B. Froehlich, M. Walessa: Subjective evaluation of the impact of spatial audio on triadic communication in virtual reality, in: 2024 16th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2024, pp. 262–265. [Google Scholar]
  11. S.A. Arboleda, C. Kunert, J. Hartbrich, C. Schneiderwind, C. Diao, C. Gerhardt, T. Surdu, F. Weidner, W. Broll, S. Werner, A. Raake: Beyond looks: a study on agent movement and audiovisual spatial coherence in augmented reality, in: 2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, March 2024, pp. 502–512. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Slater: Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 364 (2009) 3549–3557. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Werner, F. Klein, T. Mayenfels, K. Brandenburg: A summary on acoustic room divergence and its effect on externalization of auditory events, in: 2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, Lisbon, Portugal, June 2016 pp. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498973. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Neidhardt: On the plausibility of simplified acoustic room representations for listener translation in dynamic binaural auralizations. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Oct 2023. [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Wang, M. Jia, M. Li, C. Bao, W. Jin: SS-BRPE: Self-supervised blind room parameter estimation using attention mechanisms, in: ICASSP 2025 – 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2025, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Deppisch, N. Meyer-Kahlen, S.V.A. Garí: Blind identification of binaural room impulse responses from smart glasses. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 32 (2024) 4052–4065. [Google Scholar]
  17. C.J. Steinmetz, V.K. Ithapu, P. Calamia: Filtered noise shaping for time domain room impulse response estimation from reverberant speech, in: 2021 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), 2021, pp. 221–225. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Gupta, J. He, R. Ranjan, W.S. Gan, F. Klein, C. Schneiderwind, A. Neidhardt, K. Brandenburg, V. Välimäki: Augmented/mixed reality audio for hearables: sensing, control, and rendering. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 39, 3 (2022) 63–89. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Godin, H. Gamper, N. Raghuvanshi: Aesthetic modification of room impulse responses for interactive auralization, in: AES International Conference on Immersive and Interactive Audio, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Neidhardt: Effect of impaired early reflection patterns on plausibility and similarity of position-dynamic binaural ar audio. Submitted, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Neidhardt, S. Kamandi: Plausibility of an approaching motion towards a virtual sound source II: in a reverberant seminar room, in: 152nd AES Convention, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Neidhardt, A. Ignatious-Tommy, A.D. Pereppadan: Plausibility of an interactive approaching motion towards a virtual sound source based on simplified BRIR sets, in: 144th AES Convention, Milan, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Gospodarek: Acoustic and perceptual factors affecting plausibility in sound design for audio augmented reality experiences. Ph.D. thesis, New York University, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  24. H.-P. Seraphim: Untersuchungen über die unterschiedsschwelle exponentiellen abklingens von rauschbandimpulsen. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 8, 4 (1958) 280–284. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Karjalainen, H. Jarvelainen: More about this reverberation science: perceptually good late reverberation, in: 111th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. Z. Meng, F. Zhao, M. He: The just noticeable difference of noise length and reverberation perception, in: 2006 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies. IEEE, 2006, pp. 418–421. [Google Scholar]
  27. I. Frissen, B. FG Katz, C. Guastavino: Effect of sound source stimuli on the perception of reverberation in large volumes, in: International Symposium on Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval. Springer, 2009, pp. 358–376. [Google Scholar]
  28. M.G Blevins, A. Buck, Z.E. Peng, L. Wang: Quantifying the just noticeable difference of reverberation time with band-limited noise centered around 1000 Hz using a transformed up-down adaptive method, in: International Symposium on Room Acoustics, 06 2013. [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Teret, M.T. Pastore, J. Braasch: The influence of signal type on perceived reverberance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 3 (2017) 1675–1682. [Google Scholar]
  30. A.O. Vecchi, A. Kohlrausch, W. Lachenmayr, E. Mommertz: Predicting the perceived reverberation in different room acoustic environments using a binaural auditory model. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 4 (2017) EL381–EL387. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Meyer, L. Picinali: Accommodation to virtual sound rendering in a reverberant room with 3dof and 6dof interaction, in: Forum Acusticum – 11th Convention of the European Acoustics Association, June 2025. [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Neidhardt, C. Schneiderwind, F. Klein: Perceptual matching of room acoustics for auditory augmented reality in small rooms – literature review and theoretical framework. Trends in Hearing 26 (2022) 23312165221092919. [Google Scholar]
  33. N. Meyer-Kahlen: Transfer-plausible acoustics for augmented reality. Ph.D. thesis, Aalto University, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  34. C. Schneiderwind, M. Richter, N. Merten, A. Neidhardt: Effects of modified late reverberation on audio-visual plausibility and externalization in AR, in: 2023 Immersive and 3D Audio: from Architecture to Automotive (I3DA), 2023, pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  35. W.O. Brimijoin, A.W. Boyd, M.A. Akeroyd: The contribution of head movement to the externalization and internalization of sounds. PLoS One 8, 12 (2013) 12. [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Lindau, L. Kosanke, S. Weinzierl: Perceptual evaluation of model-and signal-based predictors of the mixing time in binaural room impulse responses. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 60, 11 (2012) 887–898. [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Antoni: Orthogonal-like fractional-octave-band filters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 2 (2010) 884–895. [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Nieuwenhuijse, R. Heusens, E.F. Deprettere: Robust exponential modeling of audio signals, in: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP ’98 (Cat. No.98CH36181). Vol. 6. IEEE, 1998, pp. 3581–3584. [Google Scholar]
  39. C. Pörschmann, P. Stade, J.M. Arend: Binauralization of omnidirectional room impulse responses-algorithm and technical evaluation, in: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-17), Edinburgh, UK, September 5–9, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  40. J.M. Arend, S.V.A. Garí, C. Schissler, F. Klein, P.W. Robinson: Six-degrees-of-freedom parametric spatial audio based on one monaural room impulse response. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 69, 7/8 (2021) 557–575. [Google Scholar]
  41. J.J. Wells: Modal decompositions of impulse responses for parametric interaction. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 69, 7/8 (2021) 530–541. [Google Scholar]
  42. R. Badeau, R. Boyer, B. David: EDS parametric modeling and tracking of audio signals, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), 2002, pp. 139–144. [Google Scholar]
  43. O. Das, J.S. Abel: Modal estimation on a warped frequency axis for linear system modeling. Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11192, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  44. C. Kereliuk, W. Herman, R. Wedelich, D.J. Gillespie: Modal analysis of room impulse responses using subband ESPRIT, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  45. C. Schneiderwind, L. Treybig: Late reverberation synthesis in small rooms considering modal properties, in: 50th Annual Conference on Acoustics (DAGA), Hannover, Germany, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  46. A. Neidhardt, F. Klein, N. Knoop, T. Köllmer: Flexible python tool for dynamic binaural synthesis applications, in: eBrief 24, 142nd AES Convention, Berlin, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  47. A. Mülleder, M. Romanov, N. Meyer-Kahlen, F. Zotter: Do-it-yourself headphones and development platform for augmented-reality audio, in: AES International Conference, Huddersfield, UK, Aug 2023. [Google Scholar]
  48. F. Martellotta: The just noticeable difference of center time and clarity index in large reverberant spaces. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, 2 (2010) 654–663. [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Hodgson, E.-M. Nosal: Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, 2 (2002) 931–939. [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Taylor: The rediscovered railway mysteries and other stories, 2010. Audiobook edition, narrated by Benedict Cumberbatch. Speech excerpt used for research purposes. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lexicon dry tracks II: Audio CD. Sax-Solo, TU Ilmenau, Electronic Media Technologies Group (archival copy), 1998. [Google Scholar]
  52. N. Meyer-Kahlen, S.V.A. Garí, T. McKenzie, S. Schlecht, T. Lokki: Transfer-plausibility of binaural rendering with different real-world references, in: Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA 2022. German Acoustical Society (DEGA), 2022. [Google Scholar]
  53. V. Best, R. Baumgartner, M. Lavandier, P. Majdak, N. Kopčo: Sound externalization: a review of recent research. Trends in Hearing 24 (2020) 2331216520948390. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. P. Zahorik: Auditory distance perception in humans: a summary of past and present research. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 91 (2005) 409–420. [Google Scholar]
  55. E. Larsen, N. Iyer, C.R. Lansing, A.S. Feng: On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124, 1 (2008) 450–461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. A. Neidhardt, A.-M. Zerlik, S. Kamandi: BRIR data set for interactive listener translation in two rooms. Zenodo, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3457782. [Google Scholar]
  57. S. Teng, V.R. Sommer, D. Pantazis, A. Oliva: Hearing scenes: a neuromagnetic signature of auditory source and reverberant space separation. eNeuro 4, 1 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0007-17.2017. [Google Scholar]
  58. N. Meyer-Kahlen, S.V. Amengual Garí, I. Ananthabhotla, P. Calamia: A two-dimensional threshold test for reverberation time and direct-to-reverberant ratio, in: 2023 Immersive and 3D Audio: from Architecture to Automotive (I3DA), 2023, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.