EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 16 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 11
Section Environmental Noise
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026001
Published online 11 March 2026
  1. J.W. Bradbury, S.L. Vehrencamp: Principles of Animal Communication. Vol. 132. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. S.L. McFadden, A.M. Simmons, C. Erbe, J.A. Thomas: Behavioral and physiological audiometric methods for animals, in: Exploring Animal Behavior Through Sound. Vol. 1. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022, pp. 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97540-1_10. [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Caminos, J. Garcia-Manrique, A. Lima-Rodriguez, A. Gonzalez-Herrera: Analysis of the mechanical properties of the human tympanic membrane and its influence on the dynamic behaviour of the human hearing system. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 2018 (2018) 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  4. International Standard: Electroacoustics – Sound Level Meters. Part 3: Periodic Tests: Edition 2.0. IEC Publications, Geneva, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. IEC: 61672-1, Electroacoustics – Sound level meters – Part 1: Specifications. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brüel & Kjær: Microphone Handbook: Vol. 1 – Theory (Product Data Sheet BP0029). https://www.bksv.com/-/media/literature/Product-Data/bp0029.ashx, Last viewed April 29, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  7. T.S. Ibekwe, D.O. Folorunsho, E.A. Dahilo, I.O. Gbujie, M.M. Nwegbu, O.G. Nwaorgu: Evaluation of mobile smartphones App as a screening tool for environmental noise monitoring. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 13, 2 (2016) D31–36. [Google Scholar]
  8. T. McLennon, S. Patel, A. Behar, M. Abdoli-Eramaki: Evaluation of smartphone sound level meter applications as a reliable tool for noise monitoring. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 16, 9 (2019) 620–627. [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Murphy, E.A. King: Smartphone-based noise mapping: integrating sound level meter App data into the strategic noise mapping process. Science of The Total Environment 562 (2016) 852–859. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Fava, G. Oliveira, M. Baglione, M. Pimpinella, J.B. Spitzer: The use of sound level meter apps in the clinical setting. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 25, 1 (2016) 14–28. [Google Scholar]
  11. C.A. Kardous, P.B. Shaw: Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135, 4 (2014) EL186–EL192. [Google Scholar]
  12. C.A. Kardous, P.B. Shaw: Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications (apps) using external microphones: a follow-up study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, 4 (2016) EL327. [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Roberts, C. Kardous, R. Neitzel: Improving the accuracy of smart devices to measure noise exposure. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 13, 11 (2016) 840–846. [Google Scholar]
  14. Y.C. Serpanos, J.R. Schoepflin, S.R. Cox, D. Davis: The accuracy of smartphone sound level meter applications (SLMAs) in measuring sound levels in clinical rooms. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 32, 1 (2021) 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  15. H.C. Gerhardt: Auditory selectivity for the acoustic properties of conspecific mate-attracting signals in lower vertebrates and songbirds. Open Access Animal Physiology 7 (2015) 73–85. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Khan, C. Findlay, R.A. Stevenson, T. Singh: Evaluating the accuracy of android applications in monitoring environmental noise levels. Cureus 17, 3 (2025) e81471. [Google Scholar]
  17. U. Sandberg: The multi-coincidence peak around 1000 Hz in tyre/road noise spectra. Euronoise Naples 89, 1–8 (2003) 2019. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1 &type=pdf &doi=8bdaefd04198583dbe24c37f3f03f0145c4f5e84. [Google Scholar]
  18. J.R. Barber, K.R. Crooks, K.M. Fristrup: The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 3 (2010) 180–189. [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Pardo-Quiles, J.-V. Rodríguez, J.-M. Molina-García-Pardo, L. Juan-Llácer: Traffic noise mitigation using single and double barrier caps of different shapes for an extended frequency range. Applied Sciences 10, 17 (2020) 5746. [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Freitas, P. Pereira, L. de Picado-Santos, A. Santos: Traffic noise changes due to water on porous and dense asphalt surfaces. Road Materials and Pavement Design 10, 3 (2009) 587–607. [Google Scholar]
  21. V. Vaillancourt, H. Nélisse, C. Laroche, C. Giguére, J. Boutin, P. Laferriére: Comparison of sound propagation and perception of three types of backup alarms with regards to worker safety. Noise and Health 15, 67 (2013) 420–436. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. H.S. Chan: Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure: Revised Criteria 1998, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Natarajan, S. Batts, K.M. Stankovic: Noise-induced hearing loss. Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, 6 (2024) 2347. [Google Scholar]
  24. D.I. McBride, S. Williams: Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 58, 1 (2001) 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Howells, A.C. Lees, J. Barlow, E. Berenguer, L.C. Rossi, J. Sueur, M.J. Sullivan, Y.G. Ramos, O.C. Metcalf: Temporal patterns of Amazonian insect acoustic activity. Philosophical Transactions B 380 (1928) 20240337. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.