EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 14 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 14
Number of page(s) 20
Section Hearing, Audiology and Psychoacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026007
Published online 06 March 2026
  1. World Health Organization: World Report on Hearing. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. S.A. Ausili, B. Backus, M.J.H. Agterberg, A. John van Opstal, M.M. van Wanrooij: Sound localization in real-time vocoded cochlear-implant simulations with normal-hearing listeners. Trends in Hearing 23 (2019) 2331216519847332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A.A. Kressner, T. May, T. Dau: Effect of noise reduction gain errors on simulated cochlear implant speech intelligibility. Trends in Hearing 23 (2019) 2331216519825930. [Google Scholar]
  4. B.C.J. Moore: Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear and Hearing 17, 2 (1996) 133–161. [Google Scholar]
  5. B.C.J. Moore, Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues. John Wiley & Sons, 2 edition, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Schwarz, Hearing-Loss Visualizer, 2023. https://urhear.urmc.rochester.edu/webapps/home/session.html?app=HearingLossVisualizer. [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Grimault, T. Irino, S. Dimachki, A. Corneyllie, R.D. Patterson, S. Garcia: A real time hearing loss simulator. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 104, 5 (2018) 904–908. [Google Scholar]
  8. D.S. Lum, L.D. Braida: Perception of speech and non-speech sounds by listeners with real and simulated sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Phonetics 28, 3 (2000) 343–366. [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Kayser, T. Herzke, P. Maanen, M. Zimmermann, G. Grimm, V. Hohmann: Open community platform for hearing aid algorithm research: open Master Hearing Aid (openMHA). SoftwareX 17 (2022) 100953. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Herzke: openMHA. https://github.com/HoerTech-gGmbH/openMHA/tree/master/examples/35-hearing-loss-simulation. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Grange, M. Zhang, J. Culling: The role of efferent reflexes in the efficient encoding of speech by the auditory nerve. Journal of Neuroscience 42, 36 (2022) 6907–6916. [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Meddis, W. Lecluyse, N.R. Clark, T. Jürgens, C.M. Tan, M.R. Panda, G.J. Brown: A computer model of the auditory periphery and its application to the study of hearing, in: B.C.J. Moore, R.D. Patterson, I.M. Winter, R.P. Carlyon, H.E. Gockel, Eds. Basic Aspects of Hearing, Vol. 787 of Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2013, pp. 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  13. M.J. de Boer, T. Jürgens, F.W. Cornelissen, D. Başkent: Degraded visual and auditory input individually impair audiovisual emotion recognition from speech-like stimuli, but no evidence for an exacerbated effect from combined degradation. Vision Research 180 (2021) 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Jürgens, T. Wesarg, D. Oetting, L. Jung, B. Williges: Spatial speech-in-noise performance in simulated single-sided deaf and bimodal cochlear implant users in comparison with real patients. International Journal of Audiology 62, 1 (2023) 30–43. [Google Scholar]
  15. The Clarity Team: The Clarity Project, 2024. https://claritychallenge.org/. [Google Scholar]
  16. Clarity project: ClarityChallenge, 2024. https://github.com/claritychallenge. [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Baer, B.C.J. Moore: Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94, 3 (1993) 1229–1241. [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Baer, B.C.J. Moore, Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95, 4 (1994) 2277–2280. [Google Scholar]
  19. B.C.J. Moore, B.R. Glasberg: Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 94, 4 (1993) 2050–2062. [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Nejime, B.C.J. Moore: Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102, 1 (1997) 603–615. [Google Scholar]
  21. M.A. Stone, B.C.J. Moore: Tolerable hearing aid delays. I. Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses. Ear and Hearing 20, 3 (1999) 182–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Fontan, T. Cretin-Maitenaz, C. Füllgrabe: Predicting speech perception in older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss using automatic speech recognition. Trends in Hearing 24 (2020) 2331216520914769. [Google Scholar]
  23. ITU-T: Recommendation P.58: Head and torso simulator for telephonometry, 08/1996. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Matsui: WHIS: Wadai (or Wakayama University) Hearing Impairment System, 11/2/2020. https://cs.tut.ac.jp/~tmatsui/whis/index-en.html. [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Irino: WHIS, 2023. https://github.com/AMLAB-Wakayama/WHIS. [Google Scholar]
  26. T. Irino: Hearing impairment simulator based on auditory excitation pattern playback: WHIS. IEEE Access 11 (2023) 78419–78430. [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Irino, R.D. Patterson: A time-domain, level-dependent auditory filter: the gammachirp. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 1 (1997) 412–419. [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Irino, R.D. Patterson: A compressive gammachirp auditory filter for both physiological and psychophysical data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109, 5 Pt 1 (2001) 2008–2022. [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Irino, R.D. Patterson: A dynamic compressive gammachirp auditory filterbank. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 14, 6 (2006) 2222–2232. [Google Scholar]
  30. T. Irino, R.D. Patterson: The gammachirp auditory filter and its application to speech perception. Acoustical Science and Technology 41, 1 (2020) 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Nagae, T. Irino, R. Nisimura, H. Kawahara, R.D. Patterson: Hearing impairment simulator based on compressive gammachirp filter, in: Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  32. R. Meddis: Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79, 3 (1986) 702–711. [Google Scholar]
  33. 3D Tune-In: 3D Tune-In Toolkit, 2023. https://github.com/3DTune-In/3dti_AudioToolkit. [Google Scholar]
  34. 3D Tune-In: 2015. https://www.3d-tune-in.eu/. [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Cuevas-Rodríguez, D. González-Toledo, E. La Rubia-Cuestas, C. Garre, L. Molina-Tanco, A. Reyes-Lecuona, D. Poirier-Quinot, L. Picinali: An open-source audio renderer for 3D audio with hearing loss and hearing aid simulations, in: AES Convention 142. Audio Engineering Society, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Cuevas-Rodríguez, D. González-Toledo, E. de La Rubia-Cuestas, C. Garre, L. Molina-Tanco, A. Reyes-Lecuona, D. Poirier-Quinot, L. Picinali: The 3D Tune-In Toolkit – 3D audio spatialiser, hearing loss and hearing aid simulations, in: 2018 IEEE 4th VR Workshop on Sonic Interactions for Virtual Environments (SIVE 2018). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2018, pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Cuevas-Rodríguez, L. Picinali, D. González-Toledo, C. Garre, E. de La Rubia-Cuestas, L. Molina-Tanco, A. Reyes-Lecuona: 3D Tune-In Toolkit: An open-source library for real-time binaural spatialisation. PLoS One 14, 3 (2019) e0211899. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. D.M. Rasetshwane, A.C. Trevino, J.N. Gombert, L. Liebig-Trehearn, J.G. Kopun, W. Jesteadt, S.T. Neely, M.P. Gorga: Categorical loudness scaling and equal-loudness contours in listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137, 4 (2015) 1899–1913. [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Badri, J.H. Siegel, B.A. Wright: Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 2 (2011) 852–863. [Google Scholar]
  40. 3D Tune-In: 3D Tune-In Toolkit features, 2018. https://www.3d-tune-in.eu/sites/default/files/filedepot/3D%20Tune-In%20Toolkit%20Features.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  41. 3D Tune-In: 3D Tune-In Toolkit Binaural Test Application v4.0 User Manual, 2022. https://github.com/3DTune-In/3dti_AudioToolkit/releases. [Google Scholar]
  42. A. Mourgela, J. Reiss, T. Agus: Investigation of a real-time hearing loss simulation for use in audio production, in: AES 149th Convention. Audio Engineering Society, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  43. DIN: Electroacoustics – Audiometric equipment – Part 1: Equipment for pure-tone and speech audiometry, 08/2018. [Google Scholar]
  44. P. Majdak, C. Hollomey, R. Baumgartner: AMT 1.x: A toolbox for reproducible research in auditory modeling. Acta Acustica 6 (2022) 19. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. ISO: Acoustics – Audiometric test methods – Part 1: Pure-tone air and bone conduction audiometry, 11/01/2010. [Google Scholar]
  46. ISO: Acoustics – Statistical distribution of hearing thresholds related to age and gender, 01/2017. [Google Scholar]
  47. M.T. Jacobson and P. Matthews: Generating uniformly distributed random Latin squares. Journal of Combinatorial Designs 4, 6 (1996) 405–437. [Google Scholar]
  48. P.-Z. Wu, J.T. O’Malley, V. de Gruttola, M. Charles Liberman: Primary neural degeneration in noise-exposed human cochleas: correlations with outer hair cell loss and word-discrimination scores. Journal of Neuroscience 41, 20 (2021) 4439–4447. [Google Scholar]
  49. JASP Team: JASP, 2024. https://jasp-stats.org/. [Google Scholar]
  50. J.G. Clark: Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA 23, 7 (1981) 493–500. [Google Scholar]
  51. J. Jerger, J.L. Shedd, E. Harford: On the detection of extremely small changes in sound intensity. A.M.A. Archives of Otolaryngology 69, 2 (1959) 200–211. [Google Scholar]
  52. E.P. Fowler: The diagnosis of diseases of the neural mechanism of hearing by the aid of sounds well above threshold (presidential address). The Laryngoscope 47, 5 (1937) 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  53. T. Brand, V. Hohmann: An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112, 4 (2002) 1597–1604. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.