EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 57 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 57
Number of page(s) 10
Section Aeroacoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026057
Published online 08 July 2026
  1. B. Schäffer, R. Pieren, K. Heutschi, J.M. Wunderli, S. Becker: Drone noise emission characteristics and noise effects on humans–A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 11 (2021) 5940. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. European Commission: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 of 12 March 2019 on unmanned aircraft systems and on third-country operators of unmanned aircraft systems. Official Journal of the European Union L 152 (2019). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2019/945/oj. [Google Scholar]
  3. European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA): Guidelines on Noise Measurement of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Lighter than 600 kg Operating in the Specific Category (Low and Medium Risk), 2023. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/137139/en. [Google Scholar]
  4. ISO 5305:2024 (E): Noise measurements for UAS (unmanned aircraft systems), 2024. https://www.iso.org/standard/81111.html. [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Sebastian, C. Strem: Toroidal Propeller. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), US10836466B2, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Lee, J. Choi: Parametric study of toroidal propellers for development of low-noise design technology using CFD. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 39 (2025) 3621–3628. [Google Scholar]
  7. P.Y. Li, C.F. Liu, Y. Liu, Y.N. Yang: Multi-objective design and evaluation of a toroidal rotor for quadcopters. Physics of Fluids 36, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0243175 [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Wei, Y. Ma, S. Wei, D. Wang, M. Guo, Q. Yan: Analysis and evaluation of aerodynamic noise characteristics of toroidal propeller. Drones 8, 12 (2024) 753. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. du Plessis, A. Bouferrouk: Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic analysis of looped propeller blades, in: 30th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-3156. [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Shima, H. Kaneko, J.W. Sun, H. Liu, K. Yonezawa: Aeroacoustics, psychoacoustics, and aerodynamic characteristics of innovative looped propellers using catenary curves, in: 30th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-3111. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Roger, S. Moreau: Tonal-noise assessment of quadrotor-type UAV using source-mode expansions. Acoustics 2 (2020) 674–690. [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Farassat: Derivation of Formulations 1 and 1A of Farassat. Langley Research Center, 2007. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20070010579. [Google Scholar]
  13. T.F. Brooks, C.L. Burley: Rotor broadband noise prediction with comparison to model data, in: 7th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-2210. [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Proudman: The generation of noise by isotropic turbulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 214 (1952) 119–132. [Google Scholar]
  15. W. Johnson: Rotorcraft Aeromechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 493–544. [Google Scholar]
  16. J.E. Marte, D.W. Kurtz: A Review of Aerodynamic Noise from Propellers, Rotors, and Lift Fans. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  17. N.S. Zawodny, N.A. Pettingill: Acoustic wind tunnel measurements of a quadcopter in hover and forward flight conditions, in: INTER-NOISE 2018 – 47th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering: impact of Noise Control Engineering, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. J.G. Leishman: Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. University of Maryland, Cambridge University Press, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Heutschi, B. Ott, T. Nussbaumer, P. Wellig: Synthesis of real world drone signals based on lab recordings. Acta Acustica 4, 6 (2020) 24. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. ISO 3745:2012 (E): Acoustics – Determination of sound power levels and sound energy levels of noise sources using sound pressure – Precision methods for anechoic rooms and hemi-anechoic rooms, 2012. https://www.iso.org/standard/45362.html. [Google Scholar]
  21. ISO 10534-2:2023: Acoustics – Determination of acoustic properties in impedance tubes, Part 2: two-microphone technique for normal sound absorption coefficient and normal surface impedance, 2023. https://www.iso.org/standard/81294.html. [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Weitsman, J.H. Stephenson, N.S. Zawodny: Effects of flow recirculation on acoustic and dynamic measurements of rotary-wing systems operating in closed anechoic chambers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, 3 (2020) 1325–1336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Meister, J. Jaeggi, T. Van Renterghem, R. Pieren: Measured differences in the sound emission of multi-rotor unmanned aerial systems during hover and cruise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 159, 3 (2026) 2398–2415. [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. Nakaniida, M. Sato, E. Shima: Numerical study on aerodynamic characteristics of loop propeller toward quiet eVTOL, in: AIAA Aviation Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-4521. [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Baskaran, N.S. Jamaluddin, A. Celik, D. Rezgui, M. Azarpeyvand: Effects of number of blades on propeller noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration 572 (2024) 118176. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.