| Issue |
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Topical Issue - Musical Acoustics: Latest Advances in Analytical, Numerical and Experimental Methods Tackling Complex Phenomena in Musical Instruments
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 4 | |
| Number of page(s) | 22 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2024067 | |
| Published online | 13 January 2025 | |
- L. Cremer: The physics of the violin, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- G. Bissinger: Bounce tests, modal analysis, and the playing qualities of the violin bow, Journal of the Catgut Acoustical Society 2, 8 (1995) 17–22. [Google Scholar]
- R. Caussé, J. Maigret, C. Dichtel, J. Bensoam: Study of violin bow quality, in: International Symposium on Musical Acoustics, Perugia, Italy, 10–14 September, 2001, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- F. Ablitzer: Influence des paramètres mécaniques et géométriques sur le comportement statique de l’archet de violon en situation de jeu, PhD Thesis, Université du Maine, Le Mans, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- F. Ablitzer, J.-P. Dalmont, N. Dauchez: Static model of a violin bow: Influence of camber and hair tension on mechanical behavior, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131, 1 (2012) 773–782. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- J. Regh: Violin bow playability – A player’s view, 1st edn., Regh Publishing, Wappingers Falls, New York, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- A. Tomezzoli, B. Michaud, E. Gagné, M. Begon, S. Duprey: Effect of bow camber and mass distribution on violinists’ preferences and performance, Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021) 769831. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- J. Stagg: Bow making and repair, John W Stagg Limited, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- C. Fritz, R. Viala, V. Salvador-Castrillo: Violinist, violin, bow: What can we hear and recognize? in: 24th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA2022, Gyeongju, Korea, 24–28 October, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- L. Capet: La technique supérieure de l’archet, Ed. Maurice Sénart et Cie., Paris, France, 1916. [Google Scholar]
- I. Galamian: Principles of violin playing and teaching, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
- S.B. Shipps: The influence of Lucien Capet on teaching violin, American String Teacher 43, 1 (1993) 65–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.A. Shock: Violin pedagogy through time: The treatises of Leopold Mozart, Carl Flesch, and Ivan Galamian, PhD Thesis, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- F.J. Testa: The science of the art of bowing, Violin Society of America 28th Conference 18 (2000) 173. [Google Scholar]
- A. Askenfelt, K. Guettler: The bouncing bow: Some important parameters, TMH-QPSR 38, 2–3 (1997) 53–57. [Google Scholar]
- D.A. Winter: Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ USA, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. Schoonderwaldt: Mechanics and acoustics of violin bowing, PhD Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- K. Guettler: On the creation of the Helmholtz motion in bowed strings, Acta Acustica united with Acustica 88, 6 (2002) 970–985. [Google Scholar]
- A. Askenfelt: Measurement of bow motion and bow force in violin playing, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80, 4 (1986) 1007–1015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Askenfelt, K. Guettler: On the kinematics of spiccato and ricochet bowing, Journal of the Catgut Acoustical Society 3, 6 (1997) 9–15. [Google Scholar]
- C.E. Gough: Violin bow vibrations, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131, 5 (2012) 4152–4163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- V. Salvador-Castrillo, A. Picard, D. Spalletta, F. Ablitzer, C. Fritz: Towards understanding the influence of mass distribution on the perceived weight and force controllability of a violin bow, in: Forum Acusticum, Turin, Italy, 11–15 September, 2023, p. 877. Available at https://hal.science/hal-04292419v1. [Google Scholar]
- N.A. Macmillan, C.D. Creelman: Detection Theory: A user’s guide, 2nd edn., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Lau, M. O’Mahony, B. Rousseau: Are three-sample tasks less sensitive than two-sample tasks? Memory effects in the testing of taste discrimination, Perception & Psychophysics 66 (2004) 464–474. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M.J. Hautus, D. Van Hout, H.-S. Lee: Variants of A Not-A and 2-AFC tests: Signal detection theory models, Food Quality and Preference 20, 3 (2009) 222–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y.-N. Jeong, B.-A. Kang, M.-J. Jeong, M.-J. Song, M.J. Hautus, H.-S. Lee: Sensory discrimination by consumers of multiple stimuli from a reference: Stimulus configuration in A-Not AR and constant-ref. duo-trio superior to triangle and unspecified tetrad? Food Quality and Preference 47 (2016) 10–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H.-K. Shin, M.J. Hautus, H.-S. Lee: Unspecified Duo-Trio tests can be as powerful as the specified 2-AFC: Effects of instructions and familiarization procedures on cognitive decision strategies, Food Research International 79 (2016) 114–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. de la Prida, A. Pedrero, L.A. Azpicueta-Ruiz, M.Á. Navacerrada: Listening tests in room acoustics: Comparison of overall difference protocols regarding operational power, Applied Acoustics 182 (2021) 108186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Rousseau, S. Stroh, M. O’Mahony: Investigating more powerful discrimination tests with consumers: Effects of memory and response bias, Food Quality and Preference 13, 1 (2002) 39–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M.-A. Kim, H.-S. Lee: Investigation of operationally more powerful Duo-Trio test protocols: Effects of different reference schemes, Food Quality and Preference 25, 2 (2012) 183–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Bi, M. O’Mahony, H.-S. Lee: The performance of the dual reference Duo-Trio (DRDT) method using a balanced-reference mode, Food Quality and Preference 48 (2016) 303–313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y.-J. Choi, J.-Y. Kim, R.H.B. Christensen, D. van Hout, H.-S. Lee: Superior performance of constant-saltier-reference DTF and DTFM to same-different tests by consumers for discriminating products varying sodium contents, Food Quality and Preference 37 (2014) 100–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Saitis, C. Fritz, G.P. Scavone, C. Guastavino, D. Dubois: Perceptual evaluation of violins: A psycholinguistic analysis of preference verbal descriptions by experienced musicians, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, 4 (2017) 2746–2757. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- V. Salvador-Castrillo, C. Fritz, G. Stoppani: Liens entre paramètres de facture, propriétés acoustiques et qualités perceptives sur un lot de 13 violons, in: 16ème Congrès Français d’Acoustique, CFA2022, Marseille, France, 11–15 April, Société Française d’Acoustique and Laboratoire de Mécanique et d’Acoustique, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- M. Hautus, D. Shepherd, M. Peng: Decision strategies for the two-alternative forced choice reminder paradigm, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 73 (2011) 729–737. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M. O’Mahony: Understanding discrimination tests: A user-friendly treatment of response bias, rating and ranking R-index tests and their relationship to signal detection, Journal of Sensory Studies 7, 1 (1992) 1–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M.J. Hautus, N.A. Macmillan, C.D. Creelman: Detection Theory: A user’s guide, 3rd edn., Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Bi: Statistical analyses for R-index, Journal of sensory studies 21, 6 (2006) 584–600. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.