EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2025) Acta Acust., 9 (2025) 66 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 9, 2025
Article Number 66
Number of page(s) 12
Section Environmental Noise
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025051
Published online 21 October 2025
  1. J. Kang, F. Aletta, E. Margaritis, M. Yang: A model for implementing soundscape maps in smart cities. Noise Mapping 5 (2018) 46–59. https://10.1515/noise-2018-0004. [Google Scholar]
  2. EEA: Environmental noise in Europe – 2020. Technical Reprot, 2020. Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/environmental-noise-in-europe (visited on01/24/2025). [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Espejo, V. Vargas, R. Viveros-Munoz, F.A. Labra, P. Huijse, V. Poblete: Short-time acoustic indices formonitoring urban-natural environments using artificial neural networks. Ecological Indicators 160 (2024) 111775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111775. [Google Scholar]
  4. EEA: Environmental noise in Europe 2025. Technical report, 2025. Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/environmental-noise-in-europe-2025 (visited on 11/07/2025). [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Wang, C. Li, Y. Lin, C. Weng, Y. Jiao: Smart soundscape sensing: A low-cost and integrated sensing system for urbansoundscape ecology research. Environmental Technology & Innovation 29 (2023) 102965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102965. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Can, P. Audubert, P. Aumond, E. Geisler, C. Guiu, T. Lorino, E. Rossa: Framework for urban sound assessment at the city scale based on citizen action,with the smartphone application NoiseCapture as alever for participation. Noise Mapping 10 (2023) 20220166. https://10.1515/noise-2022-0166. [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Tarlao, F. Leclerc, J. Brochu, C. Guastavino : Current approaches toplanning (with) sound. Science of The TotalEnvironment 931 (2024) 172826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172826. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Alvarsson, S. Wiens, M. Nilsson: Stress recovery during exposure to nature soundand environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7 (2010) 1036–1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7031036. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Zielinski, F. Rumsey, S. Bech: On some biases encountered in modern audio quality listening tests – a review. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 56 (2008) 427–451. [Google Scholar]
  10. L.S.M. Sugai, T.S.F. Silva, J.W. Ribeiro Jr., D. Llusia: Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience 69 (2018) 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy147. [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Metcalf, C. Abrahams, B. Ashington, E. Baker, T. Bradfer-Lawrence, E. Browning, J. Carruthers-Jones, J. Darby, J. Dick, A. Eldridge, D. Elliott, B. Heath, P. Howden-Leach, A. Johnston, A. Lees, C. Meyer, U. Ruiz Arana, S. Smyth: Good practice guidelines for long-term ecoacoustic monitoring in the UK. Technical report, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Bonet-Solà, E. Vidaña-Vila, R.M. Alsina-Pagès: Prediction of the acoustic comfort of a dwelling based on automatic sound event detection. Noise Mapping 10 (2023) 20220177. https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2022-0177. [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Ventura, V. Mallet, V. Issarny: Assimilation of mobile phone measurements for noise mapping of a neighborhood. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144 (2018) 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5052173. [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Brocolini, C. Lavandier, M. Quoy, C. Ribeiro: Measurements of acoustic environments for urban soundscapes: choice of homogeneous periods, optimization of durations, and selection of indicators. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (2013) 813–821. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4807809. [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Zwicker, H. Fastl: Psychoacoustics: facts and models, 2nd updated edn. Springer, Berlin, New York, 1999. ISBN: 978-3-540-65063-8. [Google Scholar]
  16. M.S. Engel, A. Fiebig, C. Pfaffenbach, J. Fels: A review of the use of psychoacoustic indicators on soundscape studies. Current Pollution Reports 7, 3 (2021), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-021-00197-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Lavandier, B. Defreville: The contribution of sound source characteristics in the assessment of urban soundscapes. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 92 (2006) 912–921. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Yang, J. Kang: Psychoacoustical evaluation of natural and urban sounds in soundscapes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, 1 (2013) 840–851. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4807800. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Nilsson, B. Berglund: Soundscape quality in suburban green areas and city parks. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 92 (2006) 903–911. [Google Scholar]
  20. B.T. Lawrence, J. Hornberg, T. Haselhoff, R. Sutcliffe, S. Ahmed, S. Moebus, D. Gruehn: A widened array of metrics (WAM) approach to characterize the urban acoustic environment; a case comparison of urban mixed-use and forest. Applied Acoustics 185 (2022) 108387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108387. [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Haselhoff, B. Lawrence, J. Hornberg, S. Ahmed, R. Sutcliffe, D. Gruehn, S. Moebus: The acoustic quality and health in urban environments (SALVE) project: study design, rationale and methodology. Applied Acoustics 188 (2022) 108538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108538. [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Haselhoff, T. Braun, J. Hornberg, B.T. Lawrence, S. Ahmed, D. Gruehn, S. Moebus: Analysing interlinked frequency dynamics of the urban acoustic environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (2022) 15014. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215014. [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Sueur: Sound analysis and Synthesis withR. Use R! Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018. ISBN: 978-3-319-77645-3 978-3-319-77647-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77647-7. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Haselhoff, T. Braun, A. Fiebig, J. Hornberg, B.T. Lawrence, N. Marwan, S. Moebus: Complex networks for analyzing the urban acoustic environment. Ecological Informatics 78 (2023) 102326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102326. [Google Scholar]
  25. W. Aures: Berechnungsverfahren für den sensorischen Wohlklang beliebiger Schallsignale. Acustica 59 (1985) 130–141. [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Rychtarikova, G. Vermeir: Soundscape categorization on the basis ofobjective acoustical parameters. Applied Acoustics 74 (2013) 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.01.004. [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Asensio, P. Aumond, A. Can, L. Gascó, P. Lercher, J.-M. Wunderli, C. Lavandier, G. de Arcas, C. Ribeiro, P. Muñoz, G. Licitra: A taxonomy proposal for the assessment of the changes in soundscape resulting from the COVID-19 lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Researchand Public Health 17, 12 (2020) 4205. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124205. [Google Scholar]
  28. Josef Schlittenlacher et al. Overall loudness of short time-varying sounds. In: Davy J, Ed. Proceedings – 43rd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (Internoise 2014), Melbourne, 16–19 November, Australian Acoustical Society (AAS), Melbourne, Australia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Haselhoff, M. Schuck, B.T. Lawrence, A. Fiebig, S. Moebus: Characterizing acoustic dimensions of health-related urban greenspace. Ecological Indicators 166 (2024) 112547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112547. [Google Scholar]
  30. W. Qiu, W. Murphy, A. Suter: Kurtosis: a new tool for noise analysis. Acoustics Today 16 (2020) 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1121/AT.2020.16.4.39. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jonas Hornberg et al: Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown measures on noise levels in urban areas-A pre/during comparison of long-term sound pressure measurements in the Ruhr Area, Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 9 (2021) 4653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094653. [Google Scholar]
  32. E. Kreyszig: Advanced engineering mathematics, 4th edn. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, New York, 1979. ISBN: 978-0-471-04271-6. [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, X. Xu: A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996. Available at https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:355163. [Google Scholar]
  34. P.J. Rousseeuw: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20 (1987), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. scipy.cluster.hierarchy.linkage. Available at https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.cluster.hierarchy.linkage.html#scipy.cluster.hierarchy.linkage. [Google Scholar]
  36. M.J. Warrens, H. Van Der Hoef: Understanding the adjusted rand index and other partition comparison indices based on counting object Pairs. Journal of Classification 39, 3 (2022) 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-022-09413-z. [Google Scholar]
  37. D. Steinley: Properties of the Hubert-Arabie adjusted Rand index. Psychological Methods 9, 3 (2004) 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.386. [Google Scholar]
  38. J.E. Chacón, A.I Rastrojo: Minimum adjusted Rand index for two clusterings of a given size. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification 17 (2023) 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-022-00491-w. [Google Scholar]
  39. J. Bergner, J. Peissig: On the identification and assessment of underlying acoustic dimensions of soundscapes. Acta Acustica 6 (2022) 46. https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/ 2022042. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  40. M.S. Engel, W. Davies, R.J. Young: Understanding natural sound sources in urban soundscapes through psychoacoustic and bioacoustic indicators. In: Fortschritte der Akustik-DAGA 2023, Hamburg, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  41. A.J. Fairbrass, P. Rennert, C. Williams, H. Titheridge, K.E. Jones: Biases of acoustic indices measuring biodiversity in urban areas. Ecological Indicators 83 (2017) 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.064. [Google Scholar]
  42. A. Potenza, V. Zaffaroni-Caorsi, R. Benocci, G. Guagliumi, J.M. Fouani, A. Bisceglie, G. Zambon: Biases in ecoacoustics analysis: a protocol to equalize audio recorders. Sensors 24 (2024) 4642. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144642. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.