EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 29 References
Open Access
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Article Number 29
Number of page(s) 13
Section Virtual Acoustics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026024
Published online 21 April 2026
  1. F. Brinkmann, A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl: On the authenticity of individual dynamic binaural synthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142, 4 (2017) 1784–1795. [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Stärz, S.V.D. Par, S. Roßkopf, L.O.H. Kroczek, A. Mühlberger, M. Blau: Comparison of binaural auralisations to a real loudspeaker in an audiovisual virtual classroom scenario: effect of room acoustic simulation, HRTF dataset, and head-mounted display on room acoustic perception. Acta Acustica 9 (2025) 31. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Blauert, J. Braasch, Eds.: The Technology of Binaural Understanding (Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Meyer-Kahlen: Transfer-Plausible Acoustics for Augmented Reality. Aalto University, Helsinki, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Kuhn-Rahloff: Realitätstreue, Natürlichkeit, Plausibilität. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Schneiderwind, M. Richter, N. Merten, A. Neidhardt: Effects of modified late reverberation on audio-visual plausibility and externalization in AR, in: 2023 Immersive and 3D Audio: from Architecture to Automotive (I3DA), 2023, pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Gospodarek, O. Warusfel, P. Ripollés, A. Roginska: Methodology for perceptual evaluation of plausibility with self-translation of the listener, in: Proceedings of the AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality (AVAR), 2022, pp. 401–410. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Neidhardt, A. Tommy, A.D. Pereppadan: Plausibility of an interactive approaching motion towards a virtual sound source based on simplified BRIR sets, in: 144th AES Convention. AES, Milan, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl: Assessing the plausibility of virtual acoustic environments. Acta Acustica United with Acustica 98, 5 (2012) 804–810. [Google Scholar]
  10. D.M. Green, J.A. Swets: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Robert E. Krieger, Oxford, England, 1974, 479 pp. [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Stärz, L.O.H. Kroczek, S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, S. van de Par, M. Blau: Perceptual comparison between the real and the auralized room when being presented with congruent visual stimuli via a head-mounted display, in: Proceedings of the International Congress on Acoustics (ICA), Gyeongju, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Neidhardt, C. Schneiderwind, F. Klein: Perceptual matching of room acoustics for auditory augmented reality in small rooms - Literature review and theoretical framework. Trends in Hearing 26 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Pike, F. Melchior, T. Tew: Assessing the plausibility of non-individualised dynamic binaural synthesis in a small room, in: 55th International AES Conference, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Keidser, G. Naylor, D.S. Brungart, et al.: The quest for ecological validity in hearing science: what it is, why it matters, and how to advance it. Ear and Hearing 41, Suppl 1 (2020) 5S–19S. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Blau, A. Budnik, M. Fallahi, H. Steffens, S.D. Ewert, S. van de Par: Toward realistic binaural auralizations - Perceptual comparison between measurement and simulation-based auralizations and the real room for a classroom scenario. Acta Acustica 5 (2021) 8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Best, R. Baumgartner, M. Lavandier, P. Majdak, N. Kopčo: Sound externalization: a review of recent research. Trends in Hearing 24 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Brandenburg, F. Klein, A. Neidhardt, U. Sloma, S. Werner: Creating auditory illusions with binaural technology, in: J. Blauert, J. Braasch, Eds. The Technology of Binaural Understanding. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 623–663. [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Brandenburg, S. Werner, F. Klein, C. Sladeczek: Auditory illusion through headphones: history, challenges and new solutions, in: Proceedings of the Meetings on Acoustics. Vol. 28. Buenos Aires, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Udesen, T. Piechowiak, F. Gran: The effect of vision on psychoacoustic testing with headphone-based virtual sound. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 63, 7/8 (2015) 552–561. [Google Scholar]
  20. J.C. Gil-Carvajal, J. Cubick, S. Santurette, T. Dau: Spatial hearing with incongruent visual or auditory room cues. Scientific Reports 6, 1 (2016) 37342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Keen, R.L. Freyman: Release and re-buildup of listeners’ models of auditory space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125, 5 (2009) 3243–3252. [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Stärz, L.O.H. Kroczek, S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, S. Van De Par, M. Blau: Comparing room acoustical ratings in an interactive virtual environment to those in the real room, in: Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum, Torino, Italy, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Werner, F. Klein, T. Mayenfels, K. Brandenburg: A summary on acoustic room divergence and its effect on externalization of auditory events, in: 8th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, Lisbon, Portugal, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498973. [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Denk, F. Brinkmann, A. Stirnemann, B. Kollmeier: The PIRATE: an anthropometric earPlug with exchangeable microphones for individual reliable acquisition of transfer functions at the ear canal entrance, in: Fortschritte Der Akustik (DAGA), Rostock, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  25. HTC-Corporation: VIVE Pro Eye Specs & User Guide - Developer Resources, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://developer.vive.com/resources/hardware-guides/vive-pro-eye-specs-user-guide/ (visited on 10/30/2025). [Google Scholar]
  26. T. Wendt, S. Van De Par, S.D. Ewert: A computationally-efficient and perceptually-plausible algorithm for binaural room impulse response simulation. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 62, 11 (2014) 748–766. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Steffens, S. van de Par, S. Ewert: Perceptual relevance of speaker directivity modelling in virtual rooms, in: Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics, Aachen, 2019, pp. 2651–2658. [Google Scholar]
  28. J.B. Allen, D.A. Berkley: Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65, 4 (1979) 943–950. [Google Scholar]
  29. J.-M. Jot, A. Chaigne: Digital delay networks for designing artificial reverberators, in: 90th AES Convention, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Sengpiel: Gleichungen für die Pegeldifferenz- und Laufzeitdifferenz-Lokalisationskurve, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://sengpielaudio.com/GleichungenDLundDt.pdf (visited on 05/15/2024). [Google Scholar]
  31. F. Klein, S. Werner, T. Mayenfels: Influences of training on externalization of binaural synthesis in situations of room divergence. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 65, 3 (2017) 178–187. [Google Scholar]
  32. F. Stärz, S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, L. Kroczek, S. Par, M. Blau: Acoustically transparent headphones as an add-on for a head-mounted display, in: Fortschritte Der Akustik (DAGA), Hannover, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Paquier, V. Koehl: Audibility of headphone positioning variability, in: 128th Audio Engineering Society Convention. Audio Engineering Society, London (UK), 2010. [Google Scholar]
  34. O. Kirkeby, P. Nelson: Digital filter design for inversion problems in sound reproduction. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 47 (1999) 583–595. [Google Scholar]
  35. H. Jaeger, J. Bitzer, U. Simmer, M. Blau: Echtzeitfähiges Binaurales Rendering mit Bewegungssensoren von 3D-Brillen, in: Fortschritte der Akustik (DAGA), Kiel, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  36. H. Jaeger, U. Simmer, J. Bitzer, M. Blau: Time-variant overlap-add in partitions, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00319, pre-published. [Google Scholar]
  37. D.S. Brungart, A.J. Kordik, B.D. Simpson: Effects of headtracker latency in virtual audio displays. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 54, 1 (2006) 32–44. [Google Scholar]
  38. N. Meyer-Kahlen, M. Kastemaa, S.J. Schlecht, T. Lokki: Measuring motion-to-sound latency in virtual acoustic rendering systems. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 71, 6 (2023) 390–398. [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Weinzierl, S. Lepa, D. Ackermann: A measuring instrument for the auditory perception of rooms: the room acoustical quality inventory (RAQI). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144, 3 (2018) 1245–1257. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. P. Chevret, E. Parizet: An efficient alternative to the paired comparison method for the subjective evaluation of a large set of sounds, in: Proceedings of the International Congress on Acoustics (ICA), Madrid (Spain), 2007. [Google Scholar]
  41. D. Leckschat, C. Epe: Aufnahmen von Sprecherinnen und Sprechern zur Verwendung in der Virtuellen Akustik, Zenodo, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3601086. [Google Scholar]
  42. EBU: EBU R 128 loudness normalisation and permitted maximum level of audio signals, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/r/r128_2011_DE.pdf (visited on 05/15/2023). [Google Scholar]
  43. MathWorks: Audio Toolbox User’s Guide, 2022, p. 1186. [Google Scholar]
  44. R Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 4.6.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  45. H. Wickham, M. Averick, J. Bryan, et al.: Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4, 43 (2019) 1686. [Google Scholar]
  46. M. Gagolewski: Stringi: fast and portable character string processing in R. Journal of Statistical Software 103, 2 (2022) 1–59. [Google Scholar]
  47. M.A. Lawrence: Ez: easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments, version R package 4.4-0, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ez/index.html (visited on 04/11/2025). [Google Scholar]
  48. R.V. Lenth, J. Piaskowski: Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means, manual, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://rvlenth.github.io/emmeans/. [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Kay, L.A. Elkin, J.J.H. Jacob, O. Wobbrock: ARTool: aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial anovas, manual, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.594511. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/mjskay/ARTool. [Google Scholar]
  50. H. Singmann, B. Bolker, J. Westfall, F. Aust: Afex: analysis of factorial experiments, manual, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex. [Google Scholar]
  51. R.D. Morey, J.N. Rouder: BayesFactor: computation of Bayes factors for common designs, version 0.9.12-4.7, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/richarddmorey/bayesfactor (visited on 04/11/2025). [Google Scholar]
  52. C. Mendonça, S. Delikaris-Manias: Statistical tests with MUSHRA data, in: 144th AES Convention. Audio Engineering Society, Milan (Italy), 2018. [Google Scholar]
  53. J.O. Wobbrock, L. Findlater, D. Gergle, J.J. Higgins: The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver, BC Canada, 2011, pp. 143–146. [Google Scholar]
  54. P. McCullagh, J. Nelder: Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Vol. 37. Chapman and Hall, London, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  55. C. Keysers, V. Gazzola, E.-J. Wagenmakers: Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence. Nature Neuroscience 23, 7 (2020) 788–799. [Google Scholar]
  56. E.-J. Wagenmakers: A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 5 (2007) 779–804. [Google Scholar]
  57. M. Slater, S. Wilbur: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 6 (1997) 603–616. [Google Scholar]
  58. A. Wiebe, K. Kannen, B. Selaskowski, et al.: Virtual reality in the diagnostic and therapy for mental disorders: a systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review 98 (2022) 102213. [Google Scholar]
  59. M. Lavandier, L. Heine, F. Perrin: Comparing the auditory distance and externalization of virtual sound sources simulated using nonindividualized stimuli. Trends in Hearing 28 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  60. S. Li, R. Schlieper, A. Tobbala, J. Peissig: The influence of binaural room impulse responses on externalization in virtual reality scenarios. Applied Sciences 11, 21 (2021) 10198. [Google Scholar]
  61. E.N. Lombera, J. Cerviño, L.B. Piceda, M. Viskovic, R.O. Vergara: Comparison of perceived auditory distance between real and virtual sound sources. Applied Acoustics 231 (2025) 110519. [Google Scholar]
  62. F. Stärz, S. van de Par, S. Roßkopf, L. Kroczek, A. Mühlberger, M. Blau: Supplementary material - Use of audio-visual interactive virtual environments to resolve the room divergence effect, Zenodo, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17515167. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.