EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2026) Acta Acust., 10 (2026) 32 References
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 10, 2026
Topical Issue - Modern approaches to Active Control of Sound and Vibration
Article Number 32
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2026030
Published online 24 April 2026
  1. J. Scott, C. Scott: Drone delivery models for healthcare, in: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) Held in Hawaii, USA, 2017, pp. 3297–3304. [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Attenni, V. Arrigoni, N. Bartolini, G. Maselli: Drone-based delivery systems: a survey on route planning. IEEE Access 11 (2023) 123476–123504. [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Betti Sorbelli: UAV-based delivery systems: a systematic review, current trends, and research challenges. Journal on Autonomous Transportation Systems 1 (2024) 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  4. V.C. Hollman: Drone photography and the re-aestheticisation of nature, in: Decolonising and Internationalising Geography: Essays in the History of Contested Science, 2020, pp. 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Zhao: The role of drone photography in city mapping, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Application of Intelligent Systems in Multi-modal Information Analytics Held in Changzhou, China, 2020, pp. 343-348. [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Puri, A. Nayyar, L. Raja: Agriculture drones: a modern breakthrough in precision agriculture. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems 20 (2017) 507–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mehrzad, A.D. Reza, Y. Seung-Hwa, C. Yong, L. Jeekeun: Characteristics of a tip-vortex generated by a single rotor used in agricultural spraying drone. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 149 (2023) 110995. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. More, P. Davies: Human responses to the tonalness of aircraft noise. Noise Control Engineering Journal 58 (2010) 420. [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Farassat: Derivation of Formulations 1 and 1A of Farassat. NASA Langley Research Center, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Gutin: On the sound field of a rotating propeller. Physical Magazine of the Soviet Union 9 (1948). [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Cabell, F. Grosveld, R. McSwain: Measured noise from small unmanned aerial vehicles, in: Proceedings of the Inter-Noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Held in Providence, Rhode Island, 2016, pp. 345-354. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dreier, M. Vorländer: Drone auralization model with statistical synthesis of amplitude and frequency modulations. Acta Acustica 8 (2024) 35. [Google Scholar]
  13. A.J. Torija, P. Chaitanya, Z. Li: Psychoacoustic analysis of contra-rotating propeller noise for unmanned aerial vehicles. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149 (2021) 835–846. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. König, L. Babetto, A. Gerlach, J. Fels, E. Stumpf: Prediction of perceived annoyance caused by an electric drone noise through its technical, operational, and psychoacoustic parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156 (2024) 1929–1941. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Lotinga, M. Green, A.J. Torija Martinez: How do flight operations and ambient acoustic environments influence noticeability and noise annoyance associated with unmanned aircraft systems? in: Proceedings of Quietdrones Held in Manchester, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schäffer, R. Pieren, K. Heutschi, J.M. Wunderli, S. Becker: Drone noise emission characteristics and noise effects on humans-A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (2021) 5940. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rascon, J. Martinez-Carranza: A review of noise production and mitigation in UAVs. Machine Learning for Complex and Unmanned Systems (2024) 220–235. [Google Scholar]
  18. F.B. Metzger: An assessment of propeller aircraft noise reduction technology. NASA Langley Research Center, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cambray, E. Pang, S.A.S. Ali, D. Rezgui, M. Azarpeyvand: Investigation towards a better understanding of noise generation from UAV propellers, in: Proceedings of the AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference Held in Atlanta, Georgia, 2018, p. 3450. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Du Plessis, A. Bouferrouk: Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic analysis of looped propeller blades, in: Proceedins of AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference Held in Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  21. X. Kong, M. Kingan, H. Zhu: The effect of strut geometry on propeller-strut interaction tone noise, in: Proceedings of Quietdrones Held in Manchester, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  22. Miljković: Methods for attenuation of unmanned aerial vehicle noise, in: Proceedings of the International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) Held in Opatija, Croatia, 2018, pp. 914-919. [Google Scholar]
  23. M.V. Mane, P.D. Sonawwanay, M. Solanki, V. Patel: A comprehensive review on advancements in noise reduction for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies 12 (2024) 1375–1397. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Larsson: Active Noise Control in Ventilation Systems: Practical Implementation Aspects. Blekinge Institute of Technology, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. H.F. Olson, E.G. May: Electronic sound absorber. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25 (1953) 1130–1136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Bai, D. Lee: Implementation of an active headset by using the H ∞ robust control theory. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (1997) 2184–2190. [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Zhang, T.D. Abhayapala, W. Zhang, P.N. Samarasinghe, S. Jiang: Active noise control over space: a wave domain approach. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 26 (2018) 774–786. [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Rafaely: Fundamentals of Spherical Array Processing. Springer, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Budnik, V. Mees: Free field active noise control system development using a 3D finite element based approach. Acta Acustica 9 (2025) 37. [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Koyama, J. Brunnström, H. Ito, N. Ueno, H. Saruwatari: Spatial active noise control based on kernel interpolation of sound field. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 29 (2021) 3052–3063. [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Sun, C.T. Jin, T.D. Abhayapala, P. Samarasinghe: Active noise control over 3D space with a dynamic noise source, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) Held in Seoul, Korea, 2024, pp. 1236-1240. [Google Scholar]
  32. H. Bi, F. Ma, T.D. Abhayapala, P.N. Samarasinghe: Spherical sector harmonics based directional drone noise reduction, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC) Held in Bamberg, Germany, 2022, pp. 1-5. [Google Scholar]
  33. H. Bi, Y. Zhan, T.D. Abhayapala, P.N. Samarasinghe: Directional active noise control for drone noise reduction. JASA Express Letters 5 (2025) 124801. [Google Scholar]
  34. S.M. Kuo, D.R. Morgan: Active noise control: a tutorial review. Proceedings of the IEEE 87 (1999) 943–973. [Google Scholar]
  35. V. Valimaki, A. Franck, J. Ramo, H. Gamper, L. Savioja: Assisted listening using a headset: enhancing audio perception in real, augmented, and virtual environments. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 32 (2015) 92–99. [Google Scholar]
  36. S.M. Kuo, H. Chuang, P.P. Mallela: Integrated automotive signal processing and audio system. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 39 (1993) 522–532. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hilgemann, E. Chatzimoustafa, P. Jax: Data-driven uncertainty modeling for robust feedback active noise control in headphones. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society (2024) 873–883. [Google Scholar]
  38. M.A. Poletti: Three-dimensional surround sound systems based on spherical harmonics. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 53 (2005) 1004–1025. [Google Scholar]
  39. J. Ahrens, R. Rabenstein, S. Spors: The theory of wave field synthesis revisited, in: Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society Convention Held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  40. T. Kojima, K. Arikawa, S. Koyama, H. Saruwatari: Multichannel active noise control with exterior radiation suppression based on Riemannian optimization, in: Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) Held in Helsinki, Finland, 2023, pp. 96-100. [Google Scholar]
  41. G.A. Brès, K.S. Brentner, G. Perez, H.E. Jones: Maneuvering rotorcraft noise prediction. Journal of Sound and Vibration 275 (2004) 719–738. [Google Scholar]
  42. W.N. Manamperi, T.D. Abhayapala, L. Birnie, J. Zhang, P.N. Samarasinghe: Drone audition: on measurements and modeling of drone-related transfer functions. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing (2025). [Google Scholar]
  43. J. Steiner, F. Hilgemann, P. Jax: Empirical study on active noise control in UAVs, in: Proceedings of the 11th Convention of the European Acoustics Association Forum Acusticum Held in Malaga, Spain, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  44. Y. Wu, D. Casalino: Numerical investigation of aeroacoustics for side-by-side rotor operating in proximity to the ground, in: Proceedings of Quietdrones Held in Manchester, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  45. J. Hellgren, F. Urban: Bias of feedback cancellation algorithms in hearing aids based on direct closed loop identification. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 9 (2001) 906–913. [Google Scholar]
  46. C. Weyer, P. Jax: Feedback-aware design of an occlusion effect reduction system using an earbud-mounted vibration sensor, in: Proceedings of the 15th ITG Conference on Speech Communication Held in Aachen, Germany, 2023, pp. 225-229. [Google Scholar]
  47. S. Müller, P. Massarani: Transfer-function measurement with sweeps. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 49 (2001) 443–471. [Google Scholar]
  48. Farina: Simultaneous measurement of impulse response and distortion with a swept-sine technique, in: Proceedings of the 108th AES Convention, Paris, France, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  49. O. Kirkeby, P.A. Nelson: Digital filter design for inversion problems in sound reproduction. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 47 (1999) 583–595. [Google Scholar]
  50. G.H. Golub, C.F. Van Loan: Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  51. ISO 532-2:2017(E): “Acoustics - Methods for calculating loudness - Part 2: Moore-Glasberg method”. International Organization for Standardization. [Google Scholar]
  52. Chottera, G. Jullien: A linear programming approach to recursive digital filter design with linear phase. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 29 (1982) 139–149. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.