EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2024) Acta Acust., 8 (2024) 72 References
Issue
Acta Acust.
Volume 8, 2024
Topical Issue - Virtual acoustics
Article Number 72
Number of page(s) 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2024064
Published online 16 December 2024
  1. S. Roßkopf, L.O.H. Kroczek, F. Stärz, M. Blau, S. Van de Par, A. Mühlberger: Comparable sound source localization of plausible auralizations and real sound sources evaluated in a naturalistic eye-tracking task in virtual reality, in: Proceedings of the 10th Convention of the European Acoustics Association Forum Acusticum 2023, Turin, Italy, 11–15 September, European Acoustics Association, 2024, pp. 1485–1492. [Google Scholar]
  2. T.F. Wechsler, F. Kümpers, A. Mühlberger: Inferiority or even superiority of virtual reality exposure therapy in phobias? – A systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials specifically comparing the efficacy of virtual reality exposure to gold standard in vivo exposure in agoraphobia, specific phobia, and social phobia, Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019) 1758. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Carl, A.T. Stein, A. Levihn-Coon, J.R. Pogue, B. Rothbaum, P. Emmelkamp, G.J.G. Asmundson, P. Carlbring, M.B Powers: Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Journal of Anxiety Disorders 61 (2019) 27–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Slater: Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality, British Journal of Psychology 109 (2018)431–433. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Diemer, G.W. Alpers, H.M. Peperkorn, Y. Shiban, A. Mühlberger: The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: a review of research in virtual reality, Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015) 1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. W.M. Felton, R.E. Jackson: Presence: a review, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 38 (2022) 1–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Brandenburg, F. Klein, A. Neidhardt, U. Sloma, S. Werner: Creating auditory illusions with binaural technology, in: J. Blauert, J. Braasch (eds), The technology of binaural understanding, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 623–663. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Neidhardt, C. Schneiderwind, F. Klein: Perceptual matching of room acoustics for auditory augmented reality in small rooms – literature review and theoretical framework, Trends in Hearing 26 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Blau, A. Budnik, M. Fallahi, H. Steffens, S.D. Ewert, S. Van de Par: Toward realistic binaural auralizations–perceptual comparison between measurement and simulation-based auralizations and the real room for a classroom scenario, Acta Acustica 5 (2021) 8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Stärz, L.O.H. Kroczek, S. Rosskopf, A. Mühlberger, M. Blau: Perceptual comparison between the real and the auralized room when being presented with congruent visual stimuli via a head-mounted display, in: Proceedings of the 24th International Congress on Acoustics. International Commission for Acoustics (ICA), Gyeongju, Korea, 24–28 October, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Poeschl, K. Wall, N. Doering: Integration of spatial sound in immersive virtual environments an experimental study on effects of spatial sound on presence, in: 2013 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 18–20 March, IEEE, 2013, pp. 129–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Skalski, R. Whitbred: Image versus sound: A comparison of formal feature effects on presence and video game enjoyment, PsychNology Journal 8 (2010) 67–84. [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Bormann: Presence and the utility of audio spatialization, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 14 (2005) 278–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Freeman, J. Lessiter: Here, there and everywhere: the effects of multichannel audio on presence, in Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Auditory Display, Espoo, Finland, July 29–August 1 (2001), pp. 231–234. [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Biocca, C. Harms, J.K. Burgoon: Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12 (2003) 456–480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C.S. Oh, J.N. Bailenson, G.F. Welch: A systematic review of social presence: definition, antecedents, and implications, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (2018) 409295. [Google Scholar]
  17. P.M.G. Emmelkamp, K. Meyerbröker, N. Morina: Virtual reality therapy in social anxiety disorder, Current Psychiatry Reports 22 (2020) 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Brinkmann, A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl: On the authenticity of individual dynamic binaural synthesis, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142 (2017) 1784–1795. [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Chen, J. Vroomen: Intersensory binding across space and time: a tutorial review, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75 (2013) 790–811. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Guezenoc, R. Seguier: HRTF individualization: a survey, in: 145th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2018, New York, NY, USA, 17–20 October, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Møller, M.F. Sørensen, C.B. Jensen, D. Hammershøi: Binaural technique: do we need individual recordings?, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 44 (1996) 451–469. [Google Scholar]
  22. D.R. Begault, E.M. Wenzel, M.R. Anderson: Direct comparison of the impact of head tracking, reverberation, and individualized head-related transfer functions on the spatial perception of a virtual speech source, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 49 (2001) 904–916. [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Jenny, C. Reuter: Usability of individualized head-related transfer functions in virtual reality: empirical study with perceptual attributes in sagittal plane sound localization, JMIR Serious Games 8 (2020) e17576. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Prud’homme, M. Lavandier: Do we need two ears to perceive the distance of a virtual frontal sound source? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148 (2020) 1614–1623. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. H.S. Braren, J. Fels: Towards child-appropriate virtual acoustic environments: a database of high-resolution HRTF measurements and 3D-scans of children, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (2021) 324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. R.S. Renner, B.M. Velichkovsky, J.R. Helmert: The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments–a review, ACM Computing Surveys 46 (2013) 1–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. L.E. Buck, M.K. Young, B. Bodenheimer: A comparison of distance estimation in HMD-based virtual environments with different HMD-based conditions, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 15 (2018) 1–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Ahrens, K.D. Lund, M. Marschall, T. Dau: Sound source localization with varying amount of visual information in virtual reality, PLoS One 14 (2019) e0214603. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Poirier-Quinot, M.S. Lawless: Impact of wearing a head-mounted display on localization accuracy of real sound sources, Acta Acustica 7 (2023) 3. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. T. Huisman, A. Ahrens, E. MacDonald: Ambisonics sound source localization with varying amount of visual information in virtual reality, Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021) 722321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. C.E. Jack, W.R. Thurlow: Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the “ventriloquism” effect, Perceptual and Motor Skills 37 (1973) 967–979. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Roßkopf, L.O. Kroczek, F. Stärz, M. Blau, S. Van de Par, A. Mühlberger: The effect of audio-visual room divergence on the localization of real sound sources in virtual reality, in: Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA, Hamburg, 2023, pp. 1431–1434. [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Zahorik, D.S. Brungart, A.W. Bronkhorst: Auditory distance perception in humans: a summary of past and present research, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 91 (2005) 409–420. [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Maruhn, S. Schneider, K. Bengler: Measuring egocentric distance perception in virtual reality: Influence of methodologies, locomotion and translation gains, PLoS One 14 (2019) e0224651. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. H. Adams, J. Stefanucci, S. Creem-Regehr, B. Bodenheimer: Depth perception in augmented reality: the effects of display, shadow, and position, in: 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Christchurch, New Zealand, 12–16 March, IEEE, 2022, 792–801. [Google Scholar]
  36. P.E. Etchemendy, I. Spiousas, E.R. Calcagno, E. Abregú, M.C. Eguia, R.O. Vergara: Direct-location versus verbal report methods for measuring auditory distance perception in the far field, Behavior Research Methods 50 (2018) 1234–1247. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. L.O.H. Kroczek, S. Rosskopf, F. Stärz, S. Van de Par, A. Mühlberger: The influence of affective voice on sound distance perception, in: Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA, Stuttgart, 2022, pp. 1163–1166. [Google Scholar]
  38. T. Foulsham, L.A. Sanderson: Look who’s talking? Sound changes gaze behaviour in a dynamic social scene, Visual Cognition 21 (2013) 922–944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. J.C. Middlebrooks, Z.A. Onsan: Stream segregation with high spatial acuity, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132 (2012) 3896–3911. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. R.K. Maddox, D.A. Pospisil, G.C. Stecker, A.K. Lee: Directing eye gaze enhances auditory spatial cue discrimination, Current Biology 24 (2014) 748–752. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Schleicher, S. Spors, D. Jahn, R. Walter: Gaze as a measure of sound source localization, in: AES 38th International Conference, Piteå, Sweden, June 13–15, Audio Engineering Society, 2010, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  42. V. Corporation, 2022. Available at https://valvesoftware.github.io/steam-audio/doc/capi/index.html. [Google Scholar]
  43. T. Wendt, S. Van de Par, S. Ewert: A computationally-efficient and perceptually-plausible algorithm for binaural room impulse response simulation, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 62 (2014) 748–766. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. L. Kroczek, S. Roßkopf, F. Stärz, A. Ruider, M. Blau, S. Van de Par, A. Mühlberger: A room of one’s own: a high-accuracy calibration procedure to align spatial dimensions between a virtual and a real room, 2023. Available at https://psyarxiv.com/erb49/. [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Lindau, H.-J. Maempel, S. Weinzierl: Minimum BRIR grid resolution for dynamic binaural synthesis, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (2008) 3498. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. A. Lindau, S. Weinzierl: On the spatial resolution of virtual acoustic environments for head movements in horizontal, vertical, and lateral direction, in: Proceedings of the EAA Symposium on Auralization, Espoo, Finland, 15–17 June, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  47. F. Denk, F. Brinkmann, A. Stirnemann, B. Kollmeier: The PIRATE: an anthropometric earplug with exchangeable microphones for individual reliable acquisition of transfer functions at the ear canal entrance, in: Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA, Rostock, 2019, pp. 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  48. F. Stärz, L.O.H. Kroczek, S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, S. Van de Par, M. Blau: Mounting extra-aural headphones to a head-mounted display using a 3D-printed support, in: Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA, Hamburg, 2023, pp. 1636–1639. [Google Scholar]
  49. C. Schneiderwind, A. Neidhardt, M. Dominik: Comparing the effect of different open headphone models on the perception of a real sound source, in: Audio Engineering Society Conference (2020), AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality. Audio Engineering Society, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  50. P. Lladó, T. Mckenzie, N. Meyer-Kahlen, S.J. Schlecht: Predicting perceptual transparency of head-worn devices, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 70 (2022) 585–600. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. F. Stärz, L.O.H. Kroczek, S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, S. Van de Par, M. Blau: Comparing room acoustical ratings in an interactive virtual environment to those in the real room, in: Proceedings of the 10th Convention of the European Acoustics Association Forum Acusticum 2023, Turin, Italy, 11–15 September, European Acoustics Association, 2024, pp. 5009–5016. [Google Scholar]
  52. H. Funk, C. Kuhn, L. Nielsen, K. Rische, B. Lex, B. Redecker, B. Winzer-Kiontke: Studio“ 21”: das Deutschbuch: Deutsch als Fremdsprache,Cornelsen Verlag, Berlin, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  53. MathWorks: Audio toolbox user’s guide, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  54. Z. Sosic, U. Gieler, U. Stangier: Screening for social phobia in medical in-and outpatients with the German version of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN), Journal of Anxiety Disorders 22 (2008) 849–859. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. H.W. Krohne, B. Egloff, C.-W. Kohlmann, A. Tausch: Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen version der” positive and negative affect schedule” (PANAS), Diagnostica 42 (1996) 139–156. [Google Scholar]
  56. G. Makransky, L. Lilleholt, A. Aaby: Development and validation of the Multimodal Presence Scale for virtual reality environments: a confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory approach, Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2017) 276–285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. S. Weinzierl, S. Lepa, D. Ackermann: A measuring instrument for the auditory perception of rooms: the Room Acoustical Quality Inventory (RAQI), Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144 (2018) 1245–1257. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Vive.com: VIVE Pro Eye Support. Available at https://www.vive.com/us/support/vive-pro-eye/ (accessed July 15, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  59. D.D. Salvucci, J.H. Goldberg: Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols, in: Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications – ETRA 00, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA, 6–8 November, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2000, pp. 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  60. R.T. Development Core: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, 2019. Available at https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed February 6, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  61. D. Bates, M. Mächler, B. Bolker, S. Walker: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software 67 (2015) 1–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. A. Kuznetsova, P. B. Brockhoff, R. H. B. Christensen: lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models, Journal of Statistical Software 82 (2017) 1–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. S.R. Searle, F.M. Speed, G.A. Milliken: Population marginal means in the linear model: an alternative to least squares means, American Statistician 34 (1980) 216–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. R.D. Morey, J.N. Rouder: BayesFactor version 0.9. 9: an R package for computing Bayes factor for a variety of psychological research designs, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  65. S. Holm: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (1979) 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  66. E.-J. Wagenmakers: A practical solution to the pervasive problems OFP values, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 (2007) 779–804. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. H. Jeffreys: The theory of probability, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. K.T. Gagnon, M.N. Geuss, J.K. Stefanucci: Fear influences perceived reaching to targets in audition, but not vision, Evolution and Human Behavior 34 (2013) 49–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. K. Sunder, E.-L. Tan, W.-S. Gan: Effect of headphone equalization on auditory distance perception, in: Audio Engineering Society Convention 137. Audio Engineering Society, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  70. C. Schneiderwind, M. Richter, N. Merten, A. Neidhardt: Effects of modified late reverberation on audio-visual plausibility and externalization in AR, in: 2023 Immersive and 3D Audio: from Architecture to Automotive (I3DA), Bologna, Italy, 5–7 September, IEEE, 2023, pp.1–9. [Google Scholar]
  71. M. Cuevas-Rodríguez, L. Picinali, D. González-Toledo, C. Garre, E. de la Rubia-Cuestas, L. Molina-Tanco, A. Reyes-Lecuona: 3D Tune-In Toolkit: an open-source library for real-time binaural spatialisation, PLoS One 14 (2019) e0211899. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. J. Blauert: Spatial hearing: the psychophysics of human sound localization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  73. S. Wirler, N. Meyer-Kahlen, S. Schlecht: Towards transfer-plausibility for evaluating mixed reality audio in complex scenes, in: Audio Engineering Society Conference (2020), AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality. Audio Engineering Society, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  74. L. Buck, R. Paris, B. Bodenheimer: Distance compression in the HTC vive pro: a quick revisitation of resolution, Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021) 728667. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  75. Y.-H. Huang, R. Venkatakrishnan, R. Venkatakrishnan, S.V. Babu, W.-C. Lin: Using audio reverberation to compensate distance compression in virtual reality, in: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2021, Virtual Event France, 16–17 September, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2021, pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  76. B. Li, R. Zhang, A. Nordman, S.A. Kuhl: The effects of minification and display field of view on distance judgments in real and HMD-based environments, in: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception, Tübingen Germany, 13–14 September, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2015, pp. 55–58. [Google Scholar]
  77. M. Leyrer, S.A. Linkenauger, H.H. Bülthoff, B.J. Mohler: Eye height manipulations: a possible solution to reduce underestimation of egocentric distances in head-mounted displays, ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 12 (2015) 1–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  78. C. Rajguru, G. Brianza, G. Memoli: Sound localization in web-based 3D environments, Scientific Reports 12 (2022) 12107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. M.A. Steadman, C. Kim, J.-H. Lestang, D.F.M. Goodman, L. Picinali: Short-term effects of sound localization training in virtual reality, Scientific Reports 9 (2019) 18284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. M. Pfaller, L.O. Kroczek, B. Lange, R. Fülöp, M. Müller, A. Mühlberger: Social presence as a moderator of the effect of agent behavior on emotional experience in social interactions in virtual reality, Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021) 741138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  81. DFG project homepage. Available at https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/422686707 (accessed February 19, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  82. S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, L.O.H. Kroczek: The effect of audio rendering on sound source localization, social presence and perceived audio quality in virtual reality, 2023. Available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9YQF7. [Google Scholar]
  83. S. Roßkopf, A. Mühlberger, L. O. H. Kroczek: Using an eyetracking task to evaluate the influence of binaural audio renderings on sound source localization in virtual reality, 2023. Available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2Q4Y3. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.